Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 353–382 | Cite as

Adjustment, the hands and healing

  • John L. Coulehan


Chiropractic is the largest “unorthodox” health profession in the United States. It is licensed in all 50 states and its services covered by governmental and private health insurance. Yet chiropractic remains, in the opinion of medical commentators, an unscientific healing cult. Chiropractic holds that much illness is caused, directly or indirectly, by derangements in homeostasis that result from subtle vertebral malalignments called “subluxations”. Only a minority of “straight” chiropracters continue to provide spinal manipulation as their only treatment, while the majority “mixers” have embraced physical therapy, vitamin supplements and a wide variety of drugless symptomatic treaments Clinical trials suggest that spinal manipulation has short-term benefit in back pain, but the success of chiropractic is not fully explained by that effect. The clinical art, though, as manifested in the chiropractor-patient interaction contributes greatly to chiropractic healing. This process promotes patient acceptance and validation, fulfills expectations, provides explanations and engages the patient's commitment. The same process lies at the core of the “art of medicine”. Seeing the clinical art as it functions in chiropractic can help us to understand its independent power in medicine.


Clinical Trial Health Insurance Health Profession Back Pain Physical Therapy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altman, Nathanial 1981 Chiropractic Alternative. A Spine Owner's Guide. Los Angeles: J. P. Tarcher.Google Scholar
  2. Ballantine, H. Thomas 1972 Will the Delivery of Health Care Be Improved by the Use of Chiropractic Service? New Engl. J. Med. 286(5): 237–242.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, Richard J. 1981 Bridging Clinical Distance an Empathic Rediscovery of the Known. J. Med. Philos. 6: 5–23.Google Scholar
  4. Barsky A. J. 1980 Patients Who Amplify Bodily Sensations. Annals Int. Med. 91: 63–70.Google Scholar
  5. Bergquist-Ullman, M. and U. Larsson 1977 Acute Low Back Pain in Industry. ACTA Orthopae Scandin Supplement 170.Google Scholar
  6. Blyth, P. 1974 Drugless Medicine. London: Arthur Baker.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdillon, J. F. 1982 Spinal Manipulation, 3rd Edition. Appleton-Century-Crofts: New York.Google Scholar
  8. Breen, A. C. 1977 Chiropractors and the Treatment of Back Pain. Rheumato Rehabil 16: 46–53.Google Scholar
  9. Brody, H. 1982 The Lie That Heals: The ethics of giving placebos. Ann. Int. Med. 97: 112–118.Google Scholar
  10. Bruhn, J. G. 1978 The Doctor's Touch: Tactile Communication in the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Southern Medical Journal 71: 1469–1473.Google Scholar
  11. Buckalew, I. W. and S. Ross 1981 Relationship of Perceptual Characteristics to Efficacy of placebos. Psycholog Reports 49: 955–961.Google Scholar
  12. Burnum, John F. 1979 The “Scientific” Value of Personal Care. Ann. Int. Med. 91: 643–645.Google Scholar
  13. Cannon, Walter B. 1957 “Voodoo” Death. Psychosoma Med. 19(3): 182–190.Google Scholar
  14. Chaitow, Leon 1980 Neuromuscular Technique. A Practitioner's Guide to Soft Tissue Manipulation. Wellingborough: Thorsons Publishers Limited.Google Scholar
  15. Cleary, Paul D. 1982 Chiropractic Use: A Test of Several Hypotheses. Amer. J. Pub. Hlth. 72(7): 727–729.Google Scholar
  16. Connolly J. E. and O. M. Jardon 1984 Orthopedics in Family Practice. In Textbook of Family Medicine (R. E. Rakel (ed.), 3rd edition). Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, p. 758.Google Scholar
  17. Coroll, A. H., L. A. May, and A. G. Mulley (eds.) 1981Primary Care Medicine. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, p. 561.Google Scholar
  18. Cowie, James B. and Julian B. Roebuck 1975 An Ethnography of a Chiropractic Clinic: Definitions of a Deviant Situation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  19. Crelin, Edmund S. 1973 A Scientific Test of the Chiropractic Theory. American Scientist 61: 574–580.Google Scholar
  20. Cyriax, James 1980 Textbook of Orthopaedic Medicine Vol. 2: Treatment by Manipulation, Massage and Injection. London: Baillier Tindall.Google Scholar
  21. DiMatteo M. R. 1979 A Social-Psychological Analysis of Physician-Patient Rapport: Toward a Science of the Art of Medicine. J. Soc. Issues 35: 12–33.Google Scholar
  22. Dintenfass, J. 1978 Chiropractic Today. In Wholistic Dimensions in Healing. A Resource Guide. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  23. Doran, D. M. L. and D. J. Newell 1975 Manipulation in Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Multicentre Study. Brit. Med. J. 2: 161–164.Google Scholar
  24. Engel, G. L. 1971 Sudden and Rapid Death During Psychological Stress. Folklore or Folk Wisdom? Ann. Int. Med. 74: 771–782.Google Scholar
  25. Engel, G. L. 1976 Too Little Science. The Paradox of Modern Medicine's Crisis. The Pharos 127–131.Google Scholar
  26. Engel G. L. 1978 Psychologic Stress, Vasodepressor (Vasovagal) Syncope, and Sudden Death. Ann. Int. Med. 89: 403–412.Google Scholar
  27. Evans, D. P., M. S. Burke, K. N. Lloyd, E. E. Roberts, and G. M. Roberts 1978 Lumbar Spinal Manipulation on Trial Part I — Clinical Assessment. Rheumato Rehabil. 17: 46–59.Google Scholar
  28. Faber, K. 1928 Nosography in Modern Internal Medicine. New York: Paul B. Hoeber, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Feinstein, A. R. 1967 Clinical Judgement. Baltimore, Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  30. Feinstein, A. R. 1983a An Additional Basic Science for Clinical Medicine: I. The Constraining Fundamental Paradigms. Ann. Int. Med. 99: 393–397.Google Scholar
  31. Feinstein, A. R. 1983b An Additional Basic Science for Clinical Medicine: III. The Challenges of Comparison and Measurement. Ann. Int. Med. 99: 705–712.Google Scholar
  32. Fields, Howard L. and Jon D. Levine 1981 Biology of Placebo Analgesia. Amer. J. Med. 70: 745–746.Google Scholar
  33. Fine, V. K. and M. E. Terrien 1977 Empathy in the Doctor-Patient Relationship: Skill Training for Medical Students. J. Med. Educ. 52: 752–757.Google Scholar
  34. Hooper, J. 1973 Low Back Pain and Manipulation. Paraparesis After Treatment of Low Back Pain by Physical Methods. Med. J. Australia 1: 549–551.Google Scholar
  35. Inglis, B. 1969 The Case for Unorthodox Medicine, New York: Berkeley.Google Scholar
  36. Ivey, A. E. and J. Authier 1978 Microcounselling. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  37. Janse, J. 1975 History of the Development of Chiropractic Concepts: Chiropractic Terminology. In The Research Status of Spinal Manipulative Therapy, M. Goldstein (ed.), Washington, D.C.: GPO. NINCDS Monograph #5, DREW, Publication #(NIH) 76–998.Google Scholar
  38. Kane, R. L., C. Leymaster, D. Olson, F. R. Woolley, and F. D. Fisher 1974 Manipulating the Patient. A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Physician and Chiropractic Care. Lancet 1: 1333–1336.Google Scholar
  39. Kelner, Merrijoy, Oswalk Hall, and Ian Coutler 1980 Chiropractors, Do They Help? Toronto: Fitzhenry & Whiteside.Google Scholar
  40. Kraus, H. 1970 Clinical Treatment of Back and Neck Pain. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  41. Krueger, Bruce R., and Hams Okazaki 1980 Vertebral-Basilar Distribution Infraction Following Chiropractic Cervical Manipulation. Mao Clin. Proc. 55: 322–332.Google Scholar
  42. Leis, G. L. 1971 The Professionalization of Chiropractic, Ph.D., State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
  43. Lennington, B. R., D. W. Laster, D. M. Moody, and M. R. Ball 1980 Traumatic Pseudoaneurysm of Ascending Cervical Artery in Neurofibromatous: Complication of Chiropractic Manipulation. A.J.N.R. 1: 269–270.Google Scholar
  44. Lewit, K. 1977 Manuelle Medizin in Rahmen der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Barth, Johann, Ambrosius.Google Scholar
  45. Lipowsky Z. J. 1970 Physical Illness, the Individual and the Coping Process. Psychiatry in Medicine 1: 91–102.Google Scholar
  46. Livingston, Michael C. 1971 Spinal Manipulation Causing Injury. Clin. Orthopae. Related Res. No. 81, pp. 82–86.Google Scholar
  47. Luce, John M. 1978 Chiropractic — Its History and Challenge to Medicine. The Pharos, pp. 12–17.Google Scholar
  48. Luttges, M. W. and R. A. Gerren 1980 Compression Physiology: Nerves and Roots. In S. Haldeman (ed.), Modern Developments in the Principles and Practice of Chiropractic, New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  49. MacDonald, A. J., et al. 1981Symptom Relief and the Placebo Effect in the Trial of an Anti-Peptic Drug. Gut 22(4): 323–6.Google Scholar
  50. Maigne R. 1972 Orthopedic Medicine: A New Approach to Vertebral Manipulations. Springfield, Ill: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  51. Maigne R. 1980 Manipulation of the Spine. Manipulation, Traction and Massage. Joseph B. Rogoff (ed.), Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  52. Manber, M. M. 1978 Chiropractors Pushing for a Place on Health Care Team. Mod. World News.Google Scholar
  53. McCorkle, Thomas 1961 Chiropractic: A Deviant Theory of Disease and Treatment in Contemporary Western Culture. Human Organization 20: 20–23.Google Scholar
  54. Medley, E. S. 1982 Common Health Problems in Medical Practice Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; p. 214.Google Scholar
  55. Merenstein, J. H. and J. L. Coulehan 1978 Introducing to Patient Care: A Basic Science Course for Medical Students. J. Med. Educ. 53: 982–987.Google Scholar
  56. Moertl, C. G. et al. 1975 Who Responds to Sugar Pills? Mayo Clin. Proc. 5: 96–100.Google Scholar
  57. Morrell, D. C. 1972 Symptom Interpretation in General Practice. J. Roy. Coll. Gen. Pract. 22: 297.Google Scholar
  58. National Ambulatory Care Survey 1977–78 Washington, D.C.: GPO. DHEW, PHS, National Center for Health Statistics.Google Scholar
  59. Osler, William 1910 The Faith That Heals. Brit. Med. J. pp. 1470–1472.Google Scholar
  60. Parker, G. B., H. Tupling, and D. S. Pryor 1978 A Controlled Trial of Cervical Manipulation for Migraine. Aust. NZ. J. Med. l: 589–593.Google Scholar
  61. Pasqua, G. S. 1981 The Vertebral Subluxation and Nutrition. ACA Journal of Chiropractic 15: S11-S13.Google Scholar
  62. Pellegrino, E. D. 1983 The Healing Relationship: The Architectonics of Clinical Medicine. In The Clinical Encounter. E. Shelp (ed.), D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland, pp. 153–172.Google Scholar
  63. Phillips, R. B. 1980 The Use of X-Rays in Spinal Manipulative Therapy. In Modern Development in the Principles and Practice of Chiropractic, S. Halderman (ed.), New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
  64. Poole, A. D. and R. W. Sanson-Fisher 1979 Understanding the Patient: A Neglected Aspect of Medical Education. Soc. Sci. Med. 13A: 37–43.Google Scholar
  65. Relman, A. S. 1979 Chiropractic: Recognized but Unproved. New Engl. J. Med. 301: 659–660.Google Scholar
  66. Rogers, C. R. 1970 The Interpersonal Relationship: The Core of Guidance. In Sensitivity Training and the Laboratory Approach, Golembiewski, R. T. and Blumbert, A. (eds.), N.Y.: F. E. Peacock Publ.Google Scholar
  67. Sheon, R. P., R. W. Moskowitz, and V. M. Goldberg 1982 Soft Tissue Rheumatic Pain: Recognition, Management Prevention, Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger, p. 164.Google Scholar
  68. Silver, G. A. 1980 Chiropractic: Professional Controversy and Public Policy. Am. J. Pub. Hlth. 70(4): 348–351.Google Scholar
  69. Sims-Williams, H., M. I. V. Jayson, S. M. S. Young, H. Braddeley, and E. Collins 1978 Controlled Trial of Mobilisation and Manipulation for Patients with Low Back Pain in General Practice. Brit. Med. J. 2: 1338–1340.Google Scholar
  70. Sims-Williams, H., M. I. V. Jayson, S. M. S. Young, H. Braddeley, and E. Collins 1979 Controlled Trial of Mobilisation and Manipulation for Low Back Pain: Hospital Patients. Brit. Med. J. 2: 1318–1320.Google Scholar
  71. Solhnan, A. H. 1981 Manipulative Therapy of the Spine: The Development of ‘Manual Medicine’ in Germany and Europe. Chiropractic History 1: 37–41.Google Scholar
  72. Sportelli, L. 1979 Introduction to Chiropractic. A Natural Method of Health Care. American Chiropractic Assoc.Google Scholar
  73. Stoddard, Alan 1980 Manual of Osteopathic Techniques, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  74. Truax, C. B. and R. R. Carkhuff 1976 Toward Effective Counselling and Psycho-therapy: Training and Practice. Chicago: Aldine Publ. Co.Google Scholar
  75. U.S. DREW Health-United States 1978 National Center for Health Statistics. Washington, D.C.: GPOGoogle Scholar
  76. Wardwell, W. I. 1976 Orthodox and Unorthodox Practitioners: Changing Relationships and the Future Status of Chiropractors. In: Marginal Medicine, Roy Wallis and Peter Morley (eds)., London: Peter Owen.Google Scholar
  77. Wardwell, W. I. 1980 The Future of Chiropractic. New. Engl. J. Med. 302(12): 688–690.Google Scholar
  78. White, M. 1978 Attitudes of a Community Health Board Toward Chiropractors as Health Team Members. In Sociological Symposium #22. VPI and State University; pp. 75–86.Google Scholar
  79. Wild, P. B. 1978 Social Origins and Ideology of Chiropractors. An Empirical Study of the Socialization of the Chiropractic Student. In Sociological Symposium, #22, VPI and State University; pp. 33–54.Google Scholar
  80. Wolinsky, Fredric D. 1980 The Sociology of Health: Principles, Professions, and Issues. Boston: Little, Brown & Company; pp. 291–302.Google Scholar
  81. Yesalis, C. E., R. B. Wallac, W. P. Fisher, and R. Tokheim 1980 Does Chiropractic Utilization Substitute for Less Available Medical Services? A. J. P. H. 70(4): 415–417.Google Scholar
  82. Ziv, I., M. Rangand, and H. J. Hoffman 1983 Paraplegia in Osteogenesis Imperfecta. A Case Report. J. Bone Joint Surg. (Br) 65: 184–185.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Company 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • John L. Coulehan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Community MedicineUniversity of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePittsburghU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations