Advertisement

Photosynthesis Research

, Volume 44, Issue 3, pp 261–269 | Cite as

Efficiency of photosynthesis in continuous and pulsed light emitting diode irradiation

  • Daniel J. Tennessen
  • Raymond J. Bula
  • Thomas D. Sharkey
Regular Papers

Abstract

The light utilization efficiency and relative photon requirement of photosynthesis in pulsed and continuous light from light emitting diodes (LEDs) has been measured. First, we chacterized the photon requirement of photosynthesis from light of LEDs that differ in spectral quality. A photon requirement of 10.3±0.4 was measured using light from a 658 nm peak wavelength (22 nm half band width) LED over the range of 0–50 μmol photons m−2 s−1 in 2 kPa O2 in leaves of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill., cv. VF36). Because the conversion of electrical power to photons increased with wavelength, LED lamps with peak photon output of 668 nm were most efficient for converting electricity to photosynthetically fixed carbon. The effect of pulsed irradiation on photosynthesis was then measured. When all of the light to make the equivalent of 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1 was provided during 1.5 μs pulses of 5000 μmol photons m−2 s−1 followed by 148.5 μs dark periods, photosynthesis was the same as in continuous 50 μmol photons m−2 s−1. When the pulse light and dark periods were lengthened to 200 μs and 19.8 ms, respectively, photosynthesis was reduced, although the averaged photon flux density was unchanged. Under these conditions, the light pulses delivered 1017 photons m−2, which we calculate to be equivalent to the capacitance of PS I or PS II. Data support the theory that photons in pulses of 100 μs or shorter are absorbed and stored in the reaction centers to be used in electron transport during the dark period. When light/dark pulses were lengthened to 2 ms light and 198 ms dark, net photosynthesis was reduced to half of that measured in continuous light. Pigments of the xanthophyll cycle were not affected by any of these pulsed light treatments even though zeaxanthin formation occurred when leaves were forced to dissipate an equal amount of continuous light.

Key words

light emitting diode LED pulse capacitance light utilization efficiency photon requirement photosynthetic efficiency 

Abbreviations

CWF

cool white fluorescent

EPS

xanthophyll epoxidation state

LED

light emitting diode

LUE

light utilization efficiency

PFD

photon flux density

PR

photon requirement (for CO2 fixation)

PS II

primary donor in Photosystem II

RPR

relative photon requirement

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badger MR, Sharkey TD and von Caemmerer S (1984) The relationship between steady-state gas exchange of bean leaves and the levels of carbon-reduction-cycle intermediates. Planta 160: 305–13Google Scholar
  2. Barta DJ, Tibbitts TW, Bula RJ and Morrow RC (1992) Evaluation of light emitting diode characteristics for a space-based plant irradiation source. Adv Space Res 12(5): 141–149Google Scholar
  3. Jursinic PA and Pearcy RW (1988) Determination of the rate limiting step for photosynthesis in a nearly isonuclear rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) biotype resistant to atrazine. Plant Physiol 88: 1195–200Google Scholar
  4. Björkman O (1981) Responses to different quantum flux densities. In: Lange O L Nobel P S Osmond C B and Niegler H (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New series, Vol. 12A. Physiological Plant Ecology I, pp 57–107. Springer Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  5. Bula RJ, Tennessen DJ, Morrow RC and Tibbitts TW (1994) Light emitting diodes as a plant lighting source. In: TW Tibbitts (ed) Lighting for Plants in Controlled Environments—Proceedings, National Aeronautics Space Administration, Moffett Field (in press)Google Scholar
  6. Caemmerer S von and Farquhar GD 1981 Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376–387Google Scholar
  7. Chazdon RL and Pearcy RW (1986) Photosynthetic responses to light variation in rainforest species II. Carbon gain and photosynthetic efficiency during lightflecks. Decologia 69: 524–531Google Scholar
  8. Chow WS, Hope AB and Anderson JM (1989) Oxygen per flash from leaf disks quantifies Photosystem II. Biochim Biophys Acta 973: 105–108Google Scholar
  9. Chylla RA and Whitmarsh J (1989) Inactive Photosystem II complexes in leaves. Turnover rate and quantitation. Plant Physiol 90: 765–772Google Scholar
  10. Chylla RA and Whitmarsh J (1990) Light saturation response of inactive Photosystem II reaction centers in spinach. Photosynth Res 25: 39–48Google Scholar
  11. Davies BH (1976) Carotenoids. In: Goodwin TW (ed) Chemistry and Biochemistry of Plant Pigments, pp 38–165. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Demmig Adams B, Adams WW, Green TGA, Czygan FC and Lang OL (1990) Differences in the susceptibility to light stress in two lichens forming a phycosymbiodeme, one partner possessing and one lacking the xanthophyll cycle. Oecologia 84: 451–456Google Scholar
  13. Desjardins RL, Sinclair TR, Lemon ER (1973) Light fluctuations in corn. Agron J 65: 904–908Google Scholar
  14. Diner BA (1986) The reaction center of Photosystem II. In: Staehelin LA and Arntzen CJ (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, Vol 19, pp 422–436. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Ehleringer J (1981) Leaf absorptances of mohave and sonoran desert plants. Oecologia 49: 366–370Google Scholar
  16. Emerson R and Arnold WA (1932) A separation of the reactions in photosynthesis by means of intermittent light. J Gen Physiol 15: 391–420Google Scholar
  17. Hager A (1969) Lichtbedingte pH Erniedrigung in einem Chloroplasten-Kompartiment als Ursache der enzymatischen Violaxanthin-Zeaxanthin-Umwandlung. Planta 89: 224–243Google Scholar
  18. Harbinson J and Hedley CL (1988) The kinetics of P-700 reduction in leaves: A novel in sutu probe of thylakoid functioning. Plant Cell Environ 12: 357–69Google Scholar
  19. Hoagland DR and Arnon DI (1938) The water culture method for growing plants without soil, UC: Agric Exp Sta Circular 347, pp 1–39, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  20. Ignatius RW and Martin TS (1992) Array for monochrome optoelectronic devices that produce irradiant energy. US Patent Application 07/936, 570Google Scholar
  21. Kirschbaum MUF and Pearcy RW (1988) Gas exchange analysis of the fast phase of photosynthetic induction in Alocasia macrorrhiza Plant Physiol 87: 818–821Google Scholar
  22. Kok B (1956) Photosynthesis in flashing light. Biochim Biophys 21: 245–57Google Scholar
  23. Nedbal L, Gibas C and Whitmarsh J (1991) Light saturation curves show competence of the water splitting complex in inactive Photosystem II reaction centers. Photosynth Res 30: 85–94Google Scholar
  24. Norman JM and Tanner CB (1969) Transient light measurements in plant canopies. Agron J 61: 847–849Google Scholar
  25. Ort DR and Whitmarsh J (1990) Inactive Photosystem II reaction centers: A resolution of discrepancies in Photosystem II quantitation? Photosynth Res 23: 101–104Google Scholar
  26. Pearcy RW (1988) Photosynthetic utilization of lightflecks by understory plants. Ast J Plant Physiol 15: 223–238Google Scholar
  27. Pearcy RW (1990) Sunflecks and photosynthesis in plant canopies. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 41: 421–453Google Scholar
  28. Pfitsch WA and Pearcy RW (1989) Daily carbon gain by Adenocaulon bicolor (Asteraceae), a redwood forest understory herb, in relation to its light environment. Oecologia 80: 465–470Google Scholar
  29. Sager JC and Giger WJr (1980) Re-evaluation of published data on the relative photosynthetic efficiency of intermittent and continuous light. Agric Meteorol 22: 289–302Google Scholar
  30. Sassenrath-Cole GF and Pearcy RW (1992) The role of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate regeneration in the induction requirement of photosynthetic CO2 exchange under transient light conditions. Plant Physiol 99: 227–234Google Scholar
  31. Sassenrath-Cole GF, Pearcy RW and Steinmaus S (1994) The role of enzyme activation state in limiting carbon assimilation under under variable light conditions. Plant Physiol (in press)Google Scholar
  32. Sharkey TD, Seemann JR and Pearcy RW (1986) Contribution of metabolites of photosynthesis to postillumination CO2 assimilation in response to lightflecks. Plant Physiol 82: 1063–1068Google Scholar
  33. Stitt M (1986) Limitation of photosynthesis by carbon metabolism. I. Evidence for excess electron transport capacity in leaves carrying out photosynthesis in saturating light and CO2. Plant Physiol 81: 1115–1122Google Scholar
  34. Tennessen DJ, Singsaas EL and Sharkey TD (1994) Light emitting diodes as a light source for photosynthesis research. Photosynth Res 39: 85–92Google Scholar
  35. Thayer SS and Björkman O (1989) Leaf xanthophyll content and composition in sun and shade determined by HPLC. Photosynth Res 23: 331–343Google Scholar
  36. Whitmarsh J (1992) Mobile electron carriers in thylakoids. In: Staehelin LA and Arntzen CJ (eds) Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, New Series, Vol 19, pp 508–527. Springer Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Whitmarsh J and Cramer WA (1979) Cytochrome f function in photosynthetic electron transport. Biophys J 26: 223–234Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Tennessen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Raymond J. Bula
    • 2
  • Thomas D. Sharkey
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BotanyUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Wisconsin Center for Space Automation and Robotics, College of EngineeringUniversity of Wisconsin MadisonMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations