, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 339–355 | Cite as

CO2 and plants: revisited

  • Roger C. Dahlman
CO2 Enrichment: Biosphere-Atmosphere Exchange


The decade-long USA research program on the direct effects of CO2 enrichment on vegetation has achieved important milestones and has produced a number of interesting and exciting findings. Research beginning in 1980 focused on field experiments to determine whether phenomena observed in the laboratory indeed occurred in natural environments. The answer is yes. Data obtained from numerous field studies show mixed response of crop and native species to CO2 enrichment however. Nearly all experiments demonstrate that plants exhibit positive gain when grown at elevated CO2; although the magnitude varies greatly. Most crop responses range from 30 to 50 % increase in yield. Results from long-term experiments with woody species and ecosystems are even more variable. Huge growth responses (100 to nearly 300 % increase relative to controls) are reported from several tree experiments and the salt-marsh ecosystem experiment. Other results from experiments with woody species and the tundra ecosystem suggest little no effect of CO2 on physiology, growth or productivity. Numerous studies of the physiology of the CO2 effect are continuing in attempts to understand controlling mechanisms and to explain the variable growth responses. Particular emphasis needs to be given to physiological measures of interactions involving the CO2 effect and other environmental influences, and to the wide-ranging observations of photosynthesis acclimation to CO2. Prospects for future research are identified.


CO2 Enrichment Plants Research evaluation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amthor, J. S. 1991. Respiration in a future, higher-CO2 world. Plant, Cell Environ. 14: 13–20.Google Scholar
  2. Amthor, J. S., Koch, G. W. & Bloom, A. J. 1992. CO2 inhibits respiration in leaves ofRumex crispus L. Plant Physiol. 98: 759–760.Google Scholar
  3. Arp, W. J. 1991. Effects of source-sink relations on photosynthetic acclimation to elevated CO2. Plant, Cell Environ. 14: (In press).Google Scholar
  4. Arp, W. J. & Drake, B. G. 1991. Increased photosynthetic capacity ofScirpus olnei after four years of exposure to elevated CO2. Plant Cell Environment 14(9).Google Scholar
  5. Bazzaz, F. A. 1990. The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 167–196.Google Scholar
  6. Bunce, J. 1990. Short and long-term inhibition of respiratory carbon dioxide efflux by elevated carbon dioxide. Ann. Bot. 65: 637–642.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, W. J., Allen, L. H.Jr. & Bowes, G. 1988. Effects of CO2 concentration on rubisco activity, amount and photosynthesis in soybean leaves. Plant Physiology 88: 1310–1316.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, J. J. & Sung, J. M. 1990. Gas exchange rate and yield responses of virginia-type peanut to carbon dioxide enrichment. Crop Science. 30: 1085–1089.Google Scholar
  9. Conroy, J. 1989. Influence of high CO2 onPinus radiata, Ph. D. Thesis, Maqauerie Univ, School of Biological Sciences.Google Scholar
  10. Dahlman, R. C. 1983., Strain, B. R., & Rogers, H. H. 1985. Research on the response of vegetation to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. J. Environ. Qual. 14: 1–8.Google Scholar
  11. Dahlman, R. C. 1984. Vegetation Response to Carbon Dioxide: Research Plan. DOE/ER-0187. pp 32.Google Scholar
  12. Delucia, E. H., Sasek, T. W. & Strain, B. R. 1985. Photosynthetic inhibition after long-term exposure to elevated levels of atmoshheric carbon dioxide. Photosynthesis Research 7: 175–184.Google Scholar
  13. Downton, W. J. S., Bjorkman, O. & Pike, C. S. 1980. Consequences of increased atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide for growth and photosynthesis of higher plants.In Pearman, G. I., ed. Carbon Dioxide and Climate. Australian Academy of Science, Canberra. pp. 143–151.Google Scholar
  14. Drake B. G. 1989. Elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration increases carbon sequestering coastal wetlands. Dept of Energy Research Project of the Month, October 1989. 3 pp. (available from CDIAC, P. O Box X, Oak Ridge TN, 37830).Google Scholar
  15. Drake, B. G., Ziska, L. H. Bunce, J. A., Arp, W. J., Hogan, K., Smith A. P. Dark respiration in plants grown in the field exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2. Submitted to Plant, Cell Environ.Google Scholar
  16. Ehret, D. L. & Jolliffe, P. A. 1985. Photosynthetic carbon dioxide exchange of bean plans grown at elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. Can J. Bot. 63:2026–2030.Google Scholar
  17. Hendrey, G. R., Kimball, B. 1990. FACE: Free-air carbon dioxide enrichment; Application to field-grown cotton. BNL Report 46155. 17 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., & Ephraums, J. J. 1990. Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge Univ Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Idso, S. B., Kimball, B. A., Anderson, M. G., & Mauney, J. R. 1987. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on plant growth: The interactive role of air temperature. Agric. Ecosystems Environ. 20: 1–10.Google Scholar
  20. Idso, S. B., Kimball, B. A. 1991. Effects of two and a half years of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the root density distribution of three-year-old sour orange trees. Agric. For. Meterol. 55: 345–349.Google Scholar
  21. Jarvis, P. G. 1989. Atmospheric carbon dioxide and forests. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 324: 369–392.Google Scholar
  22. Keeling, C. D., Bacastow, R. B., Carter, A. F., Piper, S. C., Whorf, T. P., Heimann, M., Mook, W. G., & Roeloffzen, H. 1989. A three dimensional model of atmospheric CO2 transport based on observed winds: 1. Analysis of observational data.In: Aspects of climate variability in the Pacific and the Western Americas, D. H., Peterson (ed), Geophysical Monograph 55, AGU, Washington (USA), 165–236.Google Scholar
  23. Kimball, B. A. 1983. Carbon dioxide and agricultural yield: an assemblage and analysis of 430 observations. Agron. J. 75: 779–788.Google Scholar
  24. Kimball, B. A. 1985a. Carbon dioxide stimulation of growth and yield under environmental restraints. In: Enoch, H. Z. & Kimball, B. A. (eds), CO2 Enrichment of Greenhouse Crops, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  25. Kimball, B. A. 1985b. Influence of elevated CO2 on crop yield. In: Enoch, H. Z. & Kimball, B. A. (eds), CO2 Enrichment of Greenhouse Crops, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  26. Kriedemann, P. E. & Wong, S. C. 1984. Growth response and photosynthetic acclimation to CO2; comparative behavior in two C3 crop species. Acta Hort. 162: 113–120.Google Scholar
  27. Lemon, E. R. (ed) 1983. CO2 and Plants: The Response of Plants to Rising Levels of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide. AAAS Selected Symposium 84. 280 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Lincoln, D. E., Couvet, D., Sionit, N. 1986. Response of an insect herbivore to host plants grown in enriched carbon dioxide atmospheres. Oceologia 69: 556–560.Google Scholar
  29. Norby, R. J. 1991. Response of white oak and yellow poplar in a two-year field CO2 experiment. Personal communication. (Note: the yellow poplar data are also reported in Norby, R. J., C. A. Gunderson, S. D. Wullschleger, E. G. O'Neill and M. K. MacCracken. Productivity and compensatory responses of yellow poplar trees in elevated CO2. Nature (in press).Google Scholar
  30. Norby, R. J., O'Neill, E. G. 1991. Leaf area compensation and nutrient interactions in CO2-enriched seedlings of yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera L.) New Phytol. 117: 515–528.Google Scholar
  31. Norby, R. J., O'Neill, E. G., Luxmore, R. J. 1986. Effects of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the growth and mineral nutrition ofQuercus alba seedlings in nutrient poor soil. Plant Physiol. 82: 83–89.Google Scholar
  32. Project Steering Group (R. Revelleet al.). 1980. Carbon Dioxide Effects Research and Assessment Program (013): Environmental and Societal Consequences of a Possible CO2-Induced Climate Change: A Research Agenda. US Dept of Energy Report DOE/EV/10019-01.Google Scholar
  33. Radin, J. W., Kimball, B. A., Hendrix, D. L. & Mauney, J. R. 1987. Photosynthesis of cotton plants exposed to elevated levels of carbon dioxide in the field. Photosynthesis Research 12: 191–203.Google Scholar
  34. Sage, R. F., Sharkey, T. D. & Seeman, J. R. 1989. Acclimation of photosynthesis to elevated CO2 in five C3 species. Plant Physiology 89: 590–596.Google Scholar
  35. Strain, B. R. 1978. Report of the Workshop on Anticipated Plant Responses to Global Carbon Dioxide Enrichment, Duke Univ, Durham N. C. (Quail Roost Meeting), 91 pp.Google Scholar
  36. Strain, B. R. 1991. SOA Major Findings. Personnel Communication, November, 1991. 3 pp.Google Scholar
  37. Strain, B. R. & Cure, J. D., eds. 1985. Direct Effects of Increasing Carbon Dioxide on Vegetation. U. S. Department of Energy Report DOE/ER-0238, 286 pp. This report contains the following chapters:Google Scholar
  38. Background on the Response of Vegetation to Atmospheric CO2 Enrichment,B. R. Strain, pp 1–10.Google Scholar
  39. Methods of Exposing Plants to Elevated CO2,B. G. Drake, H. H. Rogers, & L. H. Allen Jr., pp 11–32.Google Scholar
  40. Modeling Approaches for Evaluating Vegetation Responses to CO2 Concentration,J. F. Reynolds & B. Acock, pp 33–52.Google Scholar
  41. Crop Responses to Elevated Carbon Dioxide Concentrations,B. Acock & L. H. Allen Jr., pp 53–98.Google Scholar
  42. CO2 Doubling Responses: A Crop Survey,J. D. Cure, pp 99–116.Google Scholar
  43. Native Species Responses to Increased CO2,W. Oechel & B. R. Strain, pp 117–154.Google Scholar
  44. Effect of Increased Atmospheric CO2 on Plant Communities,F. A. Bazzaz, K. Garbutt, & W. E. Williams, pp 155–170.Google Scholar
  45. Global Biospheric Response to Increasing Atmospheric CO2 Concentration,D. M. Gates, pp 171–184.Google Scholar
  46. Adaptation of Vegetation and Management Practices to a Higher CO2 World,B. R. Kimball, pp 185–204.Google Scholar
  47. Status of Knowledge and Recommendations for Future Work,B. R. Strain & J. D. Cure, pp 205–214.Google Scholar
  48. Tans, P. P., Fung, B. R., Takahashi, T. 1990. Observational constraints on the global atmospheric CO2 budget. Science 247: 1431–1438.Google Scholar
  49. Thomas, R. B. & Strain, B. R. 1991. Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated CO2. Plant Physiology 96: 627–634.Google Scholar
  50. Tissue, D. T. & Oechel, W. C. 1987. Response ofEriophorium vaginatum to elevated CO2 and temperature in the Alaskan tundra. Ecology 68: 401–410.Google Scholar
  51. Trabalka, J. R. (ed) 1985. Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and the Global Carbon Cycle. DOE/ER-0239. 315 pp.Google Scholar
  52. U. S. Dept of Energy. 1980. Workshop on Environmental and Societal Consequences of a Possible CO2-Induced Climate Change. Conf-7904143. pp. 470.Google Scholar
  53. Von, Caemmerer, S. & Farquhar, G. D. 1984. Effects of partial defoliation, changes of irradiance during growth, short-term water stress and growth at enhanced CO2 on the photosynthetic capacity of leaves. Planta. 160: 320–329.Google Scholar
  54. Wittwer, S. H., Honma, S. 1979. Greenhouse Tomatoes, Lettuce and Cucumbers. Michigan State Univ Press, East Lansing. 225 pp.Google Scholar
  55. Ziska L. H., Hogan K. P., Smith A. P. & Drake B. G. Growth and photosynthetic response of nine tropical species with long-term exposure to elevated carbon dioxide. Oecologia 86: 383–387.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger C. Dahlman
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Environmental Sciences ResearchUnited States Department of EnergyWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations