Hydrobiologia

, Volume 132, Issue 1, pp 1–12 | Cite as

Comments on a phylogenetic system of the Platyhelminthes

  • Ulrich Ehlers

Abstract

Using the principles and methods of phylogenetic systematics, the phylogenetic relationships among the basic closed descendent communities (monophyla) of the taxon Platyhelminthes are discussed.

A phylogenetic system of the Platyhelminthes is presented and several hypothesized autapomorphies of the well-known main subordinated monophyla of free-living and parasitic platyhelminths are named. A monophylum ‘Turbellaria’ does not exist in reality.

Keywords

Platyhelminthes phylogenetic system frontal organ epidermis ciliary epidermal receptors protonephridium 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ax, P., 1984. Das phylogenetische System. Systematisierung der lebenden Natur aufgrund ihrer Phylogenese. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, New York, 349 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Ax, P., 1985. The position of the Gnathostomulida and Platyhelminthes in the phylogenetic system of the Bilateria. In S. Conway Morris, D. G. George, R. Gibson & H. M. Platt (eds), The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates. University Press, Oxford: in press.Google Scholar
  3. Brooks, D. R., 1982. Higher level classification of parasitic Platyhelminthes and fundamentals of cestode classification. In D. F. Mettrick & S. S. Desser (eds), Parasites — their world and ours. Elsevier Biomedical Press, Amsterdam: 189–193.Google Scholar
  4. Ehlers, U., 1985a. Das phylogenetische System der Plathelminthes. G. Fischer, Stuttgart, New York, 317 pp.Google Scholar
  5. Ehlers, U., 1985b. Phylogenetic relationships within the Platyhelminthes. In S. Conway Morris, D. G. George, R. Gibson & H. M. Platt (eds), The origins and relationships of lower invertebrates. University Press, Oxford: in press.Google Scholar
  6. Ehlers, U. & B. Ehlers, 1977. Monociliary receptors in interstitial Proseriata and Neorhabdocoela (Turbellaria Neoophora). Zoomorphologie 86: 197–222.Google Scholar
  7. Gustafsson, M., 1977. Aspects of the cytology and histogenesis in cestodes with special reference to the genus Diphyllobothrium. Academic Dissertation, Åbo Akademi, Finland.Google Scholar
  8. Hennig, W., 1966 (reprinted in 1979). Phylogenetic systematics. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Chicago, London, 263 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Karling, T. G., 1974. On the anatomy and affinities of the turbellarian orders. In N. W. Riser & M. P. Morse (eds), Biology of the Turbellaria. McGraw-Hill New York: 1–16.Google Scholar
  10. Klauser, M., J. P. S. Smith & S. Tyler, 1985. Ultrastructure of the frontal organ in Convoluta ‘pulchra’ and Macrostomum hystricinum: significance for models of the turbellarian archetype. This volume.Google Scholar
  11. Kluge, A. G., 1984. The relevance of parsimony to phylogenetic inference. In T. Duncan & T. F. Stuessy (eds), The estimation of evolutionary history. Proceedings of a workshop on the theory and application of cladistic methodology. Columbia University Press, New York: 24–38.Google Scholar
  12. Lacalli, T. C., 1983. The brain and central nervous system of Müller's larva. Can. J. Zool. 61: 39–51.Google Scholar
  13. Rieger, R. M., 1976. Monociliated epidermal cells in Gastrotricha: significance for concepts of early metazoan evolution. Z. zool. Syst. Evolutions forsch. 14: 198–226.Google Scholar
  14. Rieger, R. M., 1978. Multiple ciliary structures in developing spermatozoa of marine Catenulida (Turbellaria). Zoomorphologie 89: 229–236.Google Scholar
  15. Rieger, R. M., 1981a. Morphology of the Turbellaria at the ultrastructural level. Hydrobiologia 84: 213–229.Google Scholar
  16. Rieger, R. M., 1981b. Fine structure of the body wall, nervous system, and digestive tract in the Lobatocerebridae Rieger and the organization of the glio-interstitial system in Annelida. J. Morph. 167: 139–165.Google Scholar
  17. Ruppert, E. E., 1978. A review of metamorphosis of turbellarian larvae. In F. S. Chia & M. Rice (eds), Settlement and metamorphosis of marine invertebrate larvae. Elsevier/NorthHolland Biomedical Press, Amsterdam, New York: 65–81.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, J. P. S. III & S. Tyler, 1985. Frontal organs in the Acoelomorpha: ultrastructure and phylogenetic significance. This volume.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, J. P. S. III, S. Tyler & R. M. Rieger, 1985. Is the Turbellaria polyphyletic. This volume.Google Scholar
  20. Smith, J. P. S. III, S. Tyler, M. B. Thomas & R. M. Rieger, 1982. The morphology of turbellarian rhabdites: phylogenetic implications. Trans. am. micros. Soc. 101: 209–228.Google Scholar
  21. Tyler, S., 1976. Comparative ultrastructure of adhesive system in the Turbellaria. Zoomorphologie 84: 1–76.Google Scholar
  22. Tyler, S., 1979. Distinctive features of cilia in metazoans and their significance for systematics. Tissue & Cell 11: 385–400.Google Scholar
  23. Tyler, S. & R. M. Rieger, 1977. Ultrastructural evidence for the systematic position of the Nemertodermatida (Turbellaria). Acta zool. fern. 154: 193–207.Google Scholar
  24. Watrous, L. E. & Q. D. Wheeler, 1981. The out-group comparison method of character analysis. Syst. Zool. 30: 1–11.Google Scholar
  25. Wiley, E. O., 1981a. Phylogenetics. The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. J. Wiley and Sons, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, 439 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Wiley, E. O., 1981b. Convex groups and consistent classifications. Syst. Bot. 6: 346–358.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulrich Ehlers
    • 1
  1. 1.II. Zoologisches Institut and Museum der UniversitätGöttingenFederal Republic of Germany

Personalised recommendations