, Volume 116, Issue 2, pp 107–122

Responses of restored grassland ditch vegetation to hydrological changes, 1989–1992

  • E. P. H. Best
  • S. van der Schaaf
  • M. J. M. Oomes


The impact of hydrological manipulation of an unfertilised, Dutch peat grassland area on plant species composition on ditch banks and in ditchwater was studied. The hydrological manipulation involved raising the groundwater level by admitting nutrient-poor, Ca-rich groundwater in one compartment, and by retaining precipitation in another compartment. A third compartment served as control.

The plant species composition showed significant correlations with the following hydrochemical parameters: in bank vegetation with K+ concentration, and winter and summer groundwater levels, water depth and elevation; in aquatic vegetation with pH, the concentrations of Cl- organic-C and NH4+ water temperature and elevation.

The number of terrestrial plant species increased after compartmentation from 97 to 122; 16 submerged and floating species were found. Most ‘new’ terrestrial species probably emerged in response to cessation of fertilization and biomass removal, since they showed no preference for any compartment. Five species showed preference for the groundwater compartment and two for the rainwater compartment. Of the ‘new’ terrestrial plants, seven were relatively rare: Carex panicea, C. oederi, C. pallescens, C. vesicaria, Galium uliginosum, Juncus acutiflorus and Stellaria uliginosa. Of the aquatic plants, eight were relatively rare: Chara globularis, two Callitriche spp., four potamogetonaceae and Ranunculus circinatus.

This study indicates that hydrological manipulation of grassland systems in which fertilisation has ceased has profound effects on the vegetation in the ditches of these systems. Bank vegetation responds more slowly and to other hydrochemical factors than aquatic vegetation. Short-term responses in terms of increase in diversity of vegetation pattern and species richness are promising. Long-term responses are not yet known.

Key words

Conservation Management Hydrological compartmentation Groundwater level Species diversity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altena, H. J. & Oomes, M. J. M. 1980. Grassland survey and inventory of ditch banks at the Veenkampen. CABO-DLO, Wageningen. 5 p. (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  2. Bakker, J. P. 1989. Nature management by grazing and cutting. Kluwer, Dordrecht. 400 p.Google Scholar
  3. Best, E. P. H., Oomes, M. J. M., & Berendse, F. 1992. The nitrogen cycle in a non-fertilized grassland ecosystem: effects of changes in hydrology and management. In van der, Meer, H. G. & Spiertz, J. H. J. (eds). Nitrogen flows in agro-ecosystems. Agrobiol. Themes 6. CABO-DLO Wageningen: 19–32 (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  4. Best, E. P. H., Woltman, H. & Jacobs, F. H. H. submitted. Sediment-related nutrient limitation of growth of Elodea nuttallii. (Planch.) St. John as indicated by a fertilization experiment.Google Scholar
  5. Bier, G., Van der Hoek, D., Van der Schaaf, S. & Spek, T. J. 1992. Seepage and nature development in the Binnenveld between the Lower Rhine and Veenendaal. Wageningen Agricult. Univ., Dept. Hydrology, Soil Physics and Hydraulics (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  6. Clark, M. D. & Gilmour, J. T. 1983. The effect of temperature on decomposition at optimum and saturated soil water contents. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 47: 927–929.Google Scholar
  7. De Haan, H., Van Liere, L., Klapwijk, Sj. P. & Van Donk, E. 1993. The structure and function of fen lakes in relation to water table management in The Netherlands. In: Best E. P. H. & Bakker J. P. (eds). Netherlands-wetlands. Dev. Hydrobiol. 88: 155–179.Google Scholar
  8. Den Held, A. J. & Clausman, P. H. M. A. 1985. The vegetation investigation of the province Zuid-Holland. Partial Rep. 3: The vegetation typology of Zuid-Holland. Part A. The aquatic vegetation. Provincial Housing and Planning Service of Zuid-Holland. 138 p. (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  9. Dickinson, N. M. 1984. Seasonal dynamics and compartmentation of nutrients in a grassland meadow in lowland England. J. Appl. Ecol. 21: 695–701.Google Scholar
  10. Egloff, T. 1986. Auswirkungen und Beseitigung von Dungungseinflusse auf Streuwiesen. Veroff. Geobot. Inst. Tech. Hochsch. Stift. Rubel Zur. 89: 1–183.Google Scholar
  11. Fitter, A. H. & Hay, R. K. M. 1981. Environmental physiology of plants. Academic Press, London etc.: pp.76, 85.Google Scholar
  12. GauchJr, H. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Gough, M. W. & Marrs, R. H. 1990. A comparison of soil fertility between semi-natural and agricultural plant communities: implications for the creation of floristically rich grassland on abandoned agricultural land. Biol. Conserv. 51: 83–96.Google Scholar
  14. Grime, J. P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 87–93.Google Scholar
  15. Hendriks, R. F. A. 1992. Decomposition and mineralization of peat. Rep. 199, DLO Staring Centre, Wageningen. 152 p. (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  16. Hill, M. O. 1979. TWINSPAN. A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table classification of individuals and attributes. Ecology and Systematics, Cornell University, Ithaca. 90 p.Google Scholar
  17. Hoogers, B. J. 1961. Report ditch vegetation relevés in 1961. 8 p. and appendices (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  18. Jongman, R. H. G., Ter Braak, C. J. F. & Van, Tongeren, O. F. R. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen. 299 p.Google Scholar
  19. Kapfer, A. 1987. Untersuchungen zur Renaturierung ehemaliger Streuwiesen im Sudwestdeutschen Alpenvorland- Erste Tendenzen nach 4 Versuchsjahren. In: Schüber, R. & Hilbig, W. (eds). Erfassung und Bewertung Anthropogener Vegetationsveranderungen. pp. 179–215. Wissenschaftliche Beitrage Martin Luther Univ., Halle-Wittenberg.Google Scholar
  20. Koschel, R., Benndorf, J., Proft, G. & Recknagel, F. 1983. Calcite precipitation as a natural control mechanism of eutrophication. Archiv. Hydrobiol. 98: 380–408.Google Scholar
  21. Kruijne, A. A., De, Vries, D. M., & Mooi, H. 1967. Contribution to the ecology of Dutch grassland plants. Rep. Agricult. Res. 696. Pudoc, Wageningen. 65 p. (In Dutch, English summary).Google Scholar
  22. Marrs, R. H. 1985. Techniques for reducing soil fertility for nature conservation purposes: a review in relation to research at Roper's Heath, Suffolk, England. Biol. Conserv. 34: 307–332.Google Scholar
  23. Ministry of Agriculture, Nature Management & Fisheries 1989. Nature Conservation Pbn. SDU Uitg., 271 p. (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  24. Olff, H. 1993. On the mechanisms of vegetation succession. Thesis, Univ. of Groningen.Google Scholar
  25. Oomes, M. J. M., Olff, H. & Altena, H. J., Submitted. Effects of vegetation management and raising the water table on nutrient dynamics and vegetation change in a wet grassland.Google Scholar
  26. Pas, W. L. 1975. Ditch and road side vegetation survey in the southem part of the Gelderse Vallei. Rep. Wageningen Agricult. Univ., Dept. of Vegetation Science and Plant Ecology. 46 p. (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  27. Rozema, J. 1976. An ecophysiological study of the response to salt of four halophytic and glycophytic Juncus species. Flora 165: 197–209.Google Scholar
  28. Schmidt, W. 1985. Mahd ohne Dungung- Vegetationskundliche und okologische Ergebnisse aus Dauerflacheuntersuchungen zur Pflege von Brackflache. In: Schreiber K. F. (ed.). Sukzession auf Grunlandbrachen. Munstersche geogr. Arb. 20: 81–99.Google Scholar
  29. Ter Braak, C. J. F. & Prentice, I. C. 1988. Unimodal models to relate species to environment. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271–317.Google Scholar
  30. Uhl, C., Buschbacher, R. & Serrao, E. A. S. 1988. Abandoned pastures in eastern Amazonia. I. Patterns of plant succession. J. Ecol. 76: 663–681.Google Scholar
  31. Van der, Hoek, D. & Van der, Schaaf, S. 1988. The influence of water level management and groundwater quality on vegetation development in a small nature reserve in the Southern Gelderse Vallei (The Netherlands). Agricult. Water Manage. 14: 423–437.Google Scholar
  32. Van der, Meijden, R., Weeda, E. J., Holverda, W. J. & Hovenkamp, P. H. 1990. Heukels flora of the Netherlands. 21st Ed., Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen. 661 p. (In Dutch).Google Scholar
  33. Van der, Valk, A. G. & Pederson, R. L. 1989. Seed banks and the management and restoration of natural vegetation. In: Leck, M. A., Parker, V. T. & Simpson, R. L. (eds). Ecology of soil seed banks. Academic Press London: 329–344.Google Scholar
  34. Van, Dorp, D. 1992. Establishment of plant species: accessibility and suitability of restored grasslands. Landschap 9: 271–283 (In Dutch, English summary).Google Scholar
  35. Van, Dorp, D. 1993. Seed dispersal: a process in restoration management which deserves attention. De Levende Natuur 6: 205–209 (In Dutch, English summary).Google Scholar
  36. Van, Groenendael, J. M., Bekker, R. & Van, Heijst, M. 1989. The accessibility of a former pasture for new species: implications for management. Brighton crop protection Conf., Weeds 1989: 1075–1080.Google Scholar
  37. Van Wirdum, G. 1991. Evaluation of the major-ionic composition of natural waters. In: Vegetation and hydrology of floating rich-fens. Appendix D: 247–285. Thesis, Univ. of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  38. Westhoff, V. & Den, Held, A. J. 1969. Plant communities of The Netherlands. Thieme & Cie., Zutphen (In Dutch).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. P. H. Best
    • 1
  • S. van der Schaaf
    • 2
  • M. J. M. Oomes
    • 1
  1. 1.DLO Centre for Agrobiology and Soil FertilityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.WAU Department of Water ResourcesWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Waterways Exp. Stn.ASCI Corp.VicksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations