Advertisement

Vegetatio

, Volume 125, Issue 1, pp 43–50 | Cite as

Vegetative and edaphic characteristics on relic charcoal hearths in the Appalachian mountains

  • M. J. Young
  • J. E. Johnson
  • M. D. Abrams
Article

Abstract

Relic charcoal hearths are prevalent throughout the Appalachian Mountains as reminders of the wood charcoal era and are evident today by the characteristics of forest stand structure, composition and understory vegetation. The importance of the soil resource to the stability and recovery of these anomalies in the plant community is not well understood. This study was conducted to compare forest floor and soil chemical properties, and vegetative characteristics on relic charcoal hearths to adjacent, non-hearth areas. Overstory tree cover and density was significantly lower on hearths than for adjacent areas. Overstory richness and diversity were consistently, but not significantly, lower on hearths, as were density and species richness of understory and ground vegetation. Little difference between hearth and adjacent forest floor properties was observed; however, soil calcium concentrations, pH. and percent carbon were higher on hearths, and phosphorus concentrations were generally lower. We discuss the effects of releasing large amounts of base-forming cations through repeated use of the hearths and the subsequent long-term effects on soil fertility and vegetative development.

Key words

Charcoal hearths Diversity MRPP Richness Soil fertility 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BiondiniM. E., BonhamC. D. & RedenteE. F. 1985. Secondary successional patterns in a sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) community as they relate to soil disturbance and soil biological activity. Vegetatio 60: 25–36.Google Scholar
  2. BremnerJ. M. & MulvaneyC. S. 1982. Nitrogen-total. Methods of Soil Analysis. In: PageA. L. et al. (eds). Agronomy No. 9. Part 2 Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI. p. 595–622.Google Scholar
  3. Burns, R. M. & Honkala, B. H. (editors). 1990. Silvics of North America. Vol. 2. Hardwoods, USDA Forest Serv. Agric. Handb. 654: 877 p.Google Scholar
  4. Day, R. K. 1959. Forests follow the charcoal burner. The Primeval Forests of the Allegheny Plateau. In: Beatley, J. C. (ed.). Bull. Ohio Bio. Surv. 1: 182. p.Google Scholar
  5. EmrichW. 1985. Handbook of charcoal making: The traditional and industrial methods. Solar Energy R & D in the European Community. Series E, Energy from Biomass. Vol 7. D. Reidel Publ., Boston, MA. 277 p.Google Scholar
  6. Garcia-MontielD. C. & ScatenaF. N. 1994. The effect of human activity on the structure and composition of a tropical forest in Puerto Rico. For. Ecol. Manage. 63: 57–78.Google Scholar
  7. LutherE. T. 1977. Our restless earth. Univ. of Tenn. Press, Knoxville, TN. 94 p.Google Scholar
  8. MacCleeryD. W. 1993. American forests: A history of resiliency and recovery. The Forest History Society, Durham, NC. 58 p.Google Scholar
  9. MargalefR. 1951. Diversidad de espicies en las comunidades naturales. Publ. Inst. Biol. Apl. Barcelona. 9: 5–27 (English summary).Google Scholar
  10. McCureB. 1991. Multivariate analysis on the PC-ORD system. Dept. Of Gen. Sci., Oregon State Univ., Corvallis, OR.Google Scholar
  11. McLeanE. O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. Methods of Soil Analysis. In: A. L.Page, et al. (eds). Agronomy No. 9, Part 2. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI. p. 199–223.Google Scholar
  12. MengelK. & KirkbyE. A., 1987. Principles of plant nutrition. Intl. Potash Inst. Bern, Switzerland. 687 p.Google Scholar
  13. Mikan, C. J. 1993. Edaphic properties relating to altered succession on historic charcoal hearths in Pennsylvania. M.S. Thesis. Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA. 67 p.Google Scholar
  14. MikanC. J., & AbramsM.D. 1993. Altered forest composition and soil properties of historic charcoal hearths in southeastern Pennsylvania. Can. J. For. Res. 25: 687–696.Google Scholar
  15. OliverC. D. & LarsonB. C. 1990. Forest stand dynamics. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, NY. 467 p.Google Scholar
  16. Phillips, E. A. 1959. Methods of vegetation study. Henry Holt and Co., Inc. 107 p.Google Scholar
  17. PritchettW. L. & FisherR. F. 1987. Properties and management of forest soils. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. 494 p.Google Scholar
  18. ShannonC. E. & WeaverW. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. of Illinois Press. Urbana, IL. 117 p.Google Scholar
  19. ThomasG. W. 1982. Exchangeable cations. In Methods of Soil Analysis. PageA. L. et al. (eds). Agronomy No. 9, Part 2. Amer. Soc. Agron., Madison, WI. p. 159–164.Google Scholar
  20. TryonE. H. 1948. Effect of charcoal on certain properties of forest soils. Ecological Monographs 18(1): 82–115.Google Scholar
  21. WaringS. A. & BremnerJ. M. 1964. Ammonium production in soil under waterlogged conditions as an index of availability. Nature. London. 201: 951–952.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. J. Young
    • 1
  • J. E. Johnson
    • 2
  • M. D. Abrams
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ForestryNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Department of ForestryVirginia TechBlacksburgUSA
  3. 3.School of Forest ResourcesPennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations