Vegetatio

, Volume 125, Issue 1, pp 31–41

Responses in stomatal conductance to elevated CO2 in 12 grassland species that differ in growth form

  • Alan K. Knapp
  • Erik P. Hamerlynck
  • Jay M. Ham
  • Clenton E. Owensby
Article
  • 116 Downloads

Abstract

Responses in stomatal conductance (gst) and leaf xylem pressure potential (ψleaf) to elevated CO2 (2x ambient) were compared among 12 tallgrass prairie species that differed in growth form and growth rate. Open-top chambers (OTCs, 4.5 m diameter, 4.0 m in height) were used to expose plants to ambient and elevated CO2 concentrations from April through November in undisturbed tallgrass prairie in NE Kansas (USA). In June and August, ψleafwas usually higher in all species at elevated CO2 and was lowest in adjacent field plots (without OTCs). During June, when water availability was high, elevated CO2 resulted in decreased gstin 10 of the 12 species measured. Greatest decreases in gst(ca. 50%) occurred in growth forms with the highest potential growth rates (C3 and C4 grasses, and C3 ruderals). In contrast, no significant decrease in gstwas measured in the two C3 shrubs. During a dry period in September, reductions in gstat elevated CO2 were measured in only two species (a C3 ruderal and a C4 grass) whereas increased gstat elevated CO2 was measured in the shrubs and a C3 forb. These increases in gstwere attributed to enhanced ψleafin the elevated CO2 plants resulting from increased soil water availability and/or greater root biomass. During a wet period in September, only reductions in gstwere measured in response to elevated CO2. Thus, there was significant interspecific variability in stomatal responses to CO2 that may be related to growth form or growth rate and plant water relations. The effect of growth in the OTCs, relative to field plants, was usually positive for gstand was greatest (>30%) when water availability was low, but only 6–12% when ψleafwas high.

The results of this study confirm the importance of considering interactions between indirect effects of high CO2 of plant water relations and direct effects of elevated CO2 on gst, particularly in ecosystems such as grasslands where water availability often limits productivity. A product of this interaction is that the potential exists for either positive or negative responses in gstto be measured at elevated levels of CO2.

Key words

Elevated CO2 Growth form Stomatal conductance Tallgrass prairie Water relations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BazzazF.A. 1990. The response of natural ecosystems to the rising global CO2 levels. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 167–196.Google Scholar
  2. BunceJ.A. 1992a. Light, temperature and nutrients as factors in photosynthetic adjustment to an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide. Physiol. Plant. 86: 173–179.Google Scholar
  3. BunceJ.A. 1992b. Stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and respiration of temperate deciduous tree seedlings grown outdoors at an elevated concentration of carbon dioxide. Plant. Cell and Environ. 15: 541–549.Google Scholar
  4. CeulemansR. & MousseauM. 1994. Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on woody plants. New Phytol. 127: 425–446.Google Scholar
  5. CureJ.D. & AcockB. 1986. Crop responses to carbon dioxide doubling: a literature survey. Agric. For. Meteor. 38: 127–145.Google Scholar
  6. DahlmanR.C. 1993. CO2 and plants: revisited. Vegetatio 104/105: 339–355.Google Scholar
  7. EamusD. & EamusD. & JarvisP.G. 1989. The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric CO2 concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. Adv. Ecol. Res. 19: 1–55.Google Scholar
  8. FahnestockJ.T. & KnappA.K. 1994. Plant responses to selective grazing by bison: interactions between light, herbivory and water stress. Vegetatio 115: 123–131.Google Scholar
  9. FreemanC.C. & HulbertL.C. 1985. An annotated list of the vascular flora of Konza Prairie Research Natural Area, Kansas. Trans. Kan. Acad. Science 88: 84–115.Google Scholar
  10. GundersonC.A. & WullschlegerS.D. 1994. Photosynthetic acclimation in trees to rising atmospheric CO2: a broader perspective. Photosyn. Res. 39: 369–388.Google Scholar
  11. HamJ.M., OwensbyC.E., CoyneP.I. & BremerD.J. 1995. Fluxes of CO2 and water vapor from a prairie ecosystem exposed to ambient and elevated CO2. Argic. For. Meteor. 77: 73–93.Google Scholar
  12. HuntR., HandD.W., HannahM.A. & NealA.M. 1991. Responses to CO2 enrichment in 27 herbaceous species. Funct. Ecol. 5: 410–421.Google Scholar
  13. JacksonR.B., SalaO.E., FieldC.B. & MooneyH.A. 1994. CO2 alters water use, carbon gain, and yield for the dominant species in a natural grassland. Oecologia 98: 257–262.Google Scholar
  14. KnappA.K. 1992. Leaf gas exchange in Quercus macrocarpa (Fagaceae): rapid stomatal responses to variability in sunlight in a tree growth form. Am. J. Bot. 79: 599–604.Google Scholar
  15. KnappA.K. 1993. Gas exchange dynamics in C3 and C4 grasses: consequences of differences in stomatal conductance. Ecology 74: 113–123.Google Scholar
  16. KnappA.K., HamerlynckE.P. & OwensbyC.E. 1993. Photosynthetic and water relations responses to elevated CO2 in the C4 grass Andropogon gerardii. Intl. J. Plant Sci. 154: 459–466.Google Scholar
  17. KnappA.K., FahnestockJ.T. & OwensbyC.E. 1994. Elevated atmospheric CO2 alters stomatal responses to variable sunlight in a C4 grass. Plant, Cell and Environ. 17: 189–195.Google Scholar
  18. KnappA.K. & SmithW.K. 1989. Influence of growth form and water relations on stomatal and photosynthetic responses to variable sunlight in subalpine plants. Ecology 70: 1069–1082.Google Scholar
  19. LeadleyP.W. & DrakeB.G. 1993. Open top chambers for exposing plant canopies to elevated CO2 concentration and for measuring net gas exchange. Vegetatio 104/105: 3–15.Google Scholar
  20. LuoY. & StrainB.R. 1992. Leaf water status in velvetleaf under long-term interactions of water stress, atmospheric humidity, and carbon dioxide. J. Plant Physiol. 139: 600–604.Google Scholar
  21. MansfieldT.A., HetheringtonA.M. & AtkinsonC.J. 1990. Some current aspects of stomatal physiology. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Molec. Biol. 41: 55–75.Google Scholar
  22. MasleJ. 1992. Will plant performance on soils prone to drought or with high mechanical impedance to root penetration be improved under elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration? Austl. J. Bot. 40: 491–500.Google Scholar
  23. MorisonJ.I.L. 1993. Response of plants to CO2 under water limited conditions. Vegetatio 104/105: 193–209.Google Scholar
  24. MorseS.R., WayneP., MiaoS.L. & BazzazF.A. 1993. Elevated CO2 and drought alter tissue water relations of birch (Betula populifolia Marsh.) seedlings. Oecologia 95: 599–602.Google Scholar
  25. OwensbyC.E., CoyneP.I., HamJ.M., AuenL.M. & KnappA.K. 1993. Biomass production in a tallgrass prairie ecosystem exposed to ambient and elevated CO2. Ecol. Applic. 3: 644–653.Google Scholar
  26. PaezA., HellmersH. & StrainB.R. 1983. CO2 enrichment, drought stress and growth of Alaska pea plants (Pisum sativum). Physiol. Plant. 58: 161–165.Google Scholar
  27. ReginatoR.J. & VanBavelC.H.M. 1964. Soil water measurement with gamma attenuation. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 28: 721–724.Google Scholar
  28. RetuertoR. & WoodwardF.I. 1993. The influences of increased CO2 and water supply on growth, biomass allocation and water use efficiency of Sinapis alba L. grown under different wind speeds. Oecologia 94: 415–427.Google Scholar
  29. RogersH.H., RunionG.B. & KrupaS.V. 1994. Plant responses to atmospheric CO2 enrichment with emphasis on roots and the rhizosphere. Environ. Pollut. 83: 155–189.Google Scholar
  30. RogersH.H., SionitN., CureJ.D., SmithJ.M. & BinghamG.E. 1984. Influence of elevated carbon dioxide on water relations of soybeans. Plant Physiol. 74: 233–238.Google Scholar
  31. SamuelsonL.J. & SeilerJ.R. 1993. Interactive role of elevated CO2, nutrient limitations, and water stress in the growth responses of red spruce seedlings. For. Sci. 39: 348–358.Google Scholar
  32. SvejcarT.J. & BrowningJ.A. 1988. Growth and gas exchange of Andropogon gerardii as influenced by burning. J. Range Manage. 41: 239–244.Google Scholar
  33. ThomasR.B. & StrainB.R. 1991. Root restriction as a factor in photosynthetic acclimation of cotton seedlings grown in elevated carbon dioxide. Plant Physiol. 96: 627–634.Google Scholar
  34. TschaplinskiT.J., NorbyR.J. & WullschlegerS.D. 1993. Responses of loblolly pine seedlings to elevated CO2 and fluctuating water supply. Tree Physiol. 13: 283–296.Google Scholar
  35. TurnerC.T., KneislerJ.R. & KnappA.K. 1995. Comparative gas exchange and nitrogen responses of the dominant C4 grass, Andropogon gerardii, and five C3 forbs to fire and topographic position in tallgrass prairie during a wet year. Intl. J. Plant Sci. 156: 216–226.Google Scholar
  36. TyreeM.T. & AlexanderJ.D. 1993. Plant water relations and the effects of elevated CO2: a review and suggestions for future research. Vegetatio 104/105: 47–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alan K. Knapp
    • 1
  • Erik P. Hamerlynck
    • 1
  • Jay M. Ham
    • 2
  • Clenton E. Owensby
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of BiologyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA
  2. 2.Department of AgronomyKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA

Personalised recommendations