Vegetatio

, Volume 118, Issue 1–2, pp 17–28 | Cite as

The current status of European wetland inventories and classifications

  • J. M. R. Hughes
Article

Abstract

The status of wetland inventory and classification is considered for 44 European countries, as well as for the continent as a whole. Data and information were obtained from questionnaires compiled by the International Waterfowl and Wetland Research Bureau, the MedWet sub-project on inventory and monitoring, and the Ramsar Bureau. Nine European countries have national wetland inventories, and 32 have inventories of sites of international importance listed under the Ramsar Convention. There has been a trend in producing regional or continental inventories for wetlands that are important as waterfowl habitat. There is an urgent need to produce wetland inventories for all European countries. The Ramsar database takes into consideration hydrological and economic wetland values, as well as ecological ones. The Ramsar classification lists a total of 35 wetland types, and is sufficiently flexible that it could be used for classifying European wetlands at the national scale.

Key words

Classification Database European wetlands Inventory 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agencia de Medio Ambiente. 1989. Edudio de la Gestion Integrada de las Zonas Humedas Costeras en Andalucia. Direction General de Conservacion de la Naturaleza (AMA) con la colaboracion del Grupo de Expertos Comunitarios en Zonas Humedas por encargo de la DGX1 de la CEC.Google Scholar
  2. Amengual Ramis, J. F. 1991. Inventario de las Zonas Humedas de Baleares. Serveis Forestals de Balears, SA.Google Scholar
  3. Barnaud, G. & Richard, D. 1993. Inventaires des zones humides en France. In: Ramsar Convention Bureau (ed.) Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Kushiro, Japan. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  4. Barnaud, G. & Richard, D. France. In: Hecker, N. & Tomàs-Vives, P. (Eds), The status of wetland inventories in the Mediterranean region. MedWet project, ICN and IWRB, (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Buck, A. L. 1993. An Inventory of UK Estuaries (7 Volumes). Joint Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Burd, F. 1989. The Saltmarsh Survey of Great Britain. An Inventory of British Saltmarshes. Research and Survey in Nature Conservation No. 17. Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  7. Carp, E. 1980. Wetlands of International Importance in the Western Palearctic. UNEP (Kenya) and WWF (Switzerland).Google Scholar
  8. Casado, S., Florin, M., Molla, S. & Montes, C. 1992. Current Status of Spanish Wetlands. pp. 56–58. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. & Davis, T. J. (eds) Managing Mediterranean Wetlands and their Birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Commission of the European Communities. 1991. CORINE Biotopes- the design, compilation and use of an inventory of sites of major importance for nature conservation in the European Community. EUR 13231, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  10. Costa, L. T. et al. Portugal. In: Hecker, N. & Tomàs-Vives, P. (Eds), The status of wetland inventories in the Mediterranean region. MedWet project, ICN and IWRB. (in press).Google Scholar
  11. Davidson, N. C., Laffoley, D. d'A., Doody, J. P., Way, L. S., Gordon, J., Key, R., Drake, C. M., Pienkowski, M. W., Mitchell, R. & Duff, K. L. 1991. Nature Conservation and Estuaries in Great Britain. NCC, Peterborough.Google Scholar
  12. De Maria, G. (ed) 1992. Inventario delle Zone Umide del Territorio Italiano. Servizio Conservazione della Natura, Ministerio dell' Ambiente.Google Scholar
  13. Demetropoulos, A. 1989. Annual Report on the Fisheries Department and the Cyprus Fisheries, 1989 Fisheries Department, Ministry of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Nicosia.Google Scholar
  14. Dybbro, T. 1985. Status of Danish Bird Localities. Danish Omithological Society, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  15. Eldoy, S. 1990. Wetland Conservation and Management in Norway. In: Finlayson, C. M. and Larsson, T. (eds) Wetland Management and Restoration. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.Google Scholar
  16. Environmental Problems Foundation of Turkey. 1989. Wetlands of Turkey, EPFT.Google Scholar
  17. Ertan, A., Kilic, A. & Kasparek, M. 1989. Türkiye'nin Onemli Kus Alanlan. DHKD/ICBP, Istanbul.Google Scholar
  18. Etienne, P. 1990. Inventaire des Zones Humides de la Somme. Association Picarde Chasseurs de Gibier d'Eau, F. D. C., Somme.Google Scholar
  19. Farinha, J. C. & Trindade, A. 1994. Contribuicao para o Inventario e Caracterizacao Nacional de Zonas Humidas. Estudos de Biologia e Conservacao da Natureza. Instituto da Conservacao da Natureza. Lishoa.Google Scholar
  20. Ferdinand, L. 1980. Birds in the Landscape. Danish Ornithological Society, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  21. Frikke, J. 1991. Breeding waders and wet grassland habitats in Denmark. Wader Study Group Bulletin 61: 42–49.Google Scholar
  22. Gerakis, P. A. 1990. (ed) Conservation and management of the wetlands in Greece Proceedings of the Thessaloniki Workshop, 17–21 April 1989, WWF and Laboratory of Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotelian University, Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
  23. Gjiknuri, L. & Peja, N. 1992. Albanian Lagoons: Their importance and economic development, pp. 130–133. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. and Davis, D. J. (eds.), Managing Mediterranean Wetlands and their Birds. IWRB Special Publication No. 20, Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Grimmett, R. F. A. & Jones, T. A. 1989. Important Bird Areas In Europe. ICRP and IWRB, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Haapanen, A. 1981. Finnish National Wetland Conservation Program. Committee Report 32, 1–197.Google Scholar
  26. Harengerd, M. 1990. Die Ramsar-Konvention, Bericht fur die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1990. Ber. Dtsch. Sekt. IRV 29, 87–99.Google Scholar
  27. Haslam, S. M. 1987. River Plants of Western Europe. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hecker, N. & Tomàs-Vives, P. (Eds), The status of wetland inventories in the Mediterranean region. MedWet project, ICN and IWRB, (in press).Google Scholar
  29. Heliotis, F. 1988. An inventory and review of the wetland resources in Greece. Wetlands 8, 15–31.Google Scholar
  30. Hollis, G. E. & Jones, T. A. 1991. Europe and the Mediterranean Basin pp 27–56. In: Finlayson, M. & Moser, M. (eds) Wetlands. IWRB, Slimbridge, UK. pp. 27–56.Google Scholar
  31. Hudec, K. Wetlands of the Czech Republic. Ministry of the Environment, Czechoslovakia (in press).Google Scholar
  32. Hudec, K., Husak, S., Janda, J. & Pellantova, J. 1993. Survey of Aquatic and Wetland Biotopes of the Czech Republic (Summary Report). Czech Ramsar Committee.Google Scholar
  33. Jacoby, H. 1991. Errichtung und Sicherung schutzwurdiger Teile von Natur und Landschaft mit gesamtstaatlich reprasentativer Bedeutung; Beispiel: Wollmatinger Ried. Nt. und Landsch. 66, 567–572.Google Scholar
  34. Jones, T. A. & Hughes, J. M. R. 1993. Wetland inventories and wetland loss studies: a European perspective. pp. 164–170. In: Moser, M., Prentice, R. C. & van Vessem, J. (eds), Waterfowl and Wetland Conservation in the 1990s. IWRB Special Publication No. 26 IWRB, Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Kirby, J. S., Ferns, J. R., Waters, R. J. & Prys-Jones, R. P. 1991. Wildfowl and Wader Counts 1990–91. The Wildfowl and Wetlands Trust, Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  36. Leontiades, L. 1977. Report on Wetlands and Marine Parks in Cyprus. Prepared for the UNEP Expert Consultation on Mediterranean Marine Parks and Wetlands, Tunis, 12–14 January, 1977.Google Scholar
  37. Leuzinger, H. 1976. Inventar der Schweizer Wasservogelgebiete von Internationaler und Nationaler Bedeutung. Orn. Beob. 73, 147–194.Google Scholar
  38. Lindsay, R. A. National Peatland Resource Inventory. Joint Nature Conservancy Council, Peterborough, UK (in prep.).Google Scholar
  39. Marti, C. 1988. Zones d'Importance Internationale pour les oiseaux d'eau en Suisse; Cartes commentées pour la première revision de l'inventaire, 1987. Station Ornithologique Suisse, Sempach.Google Scholar
  40. Marti, C. & Schifferli, L. 1987. Inventar der Schweizer Wasservogelgebiete von Internationaler Bedeutung. Erste Revision 1986. Orn. Beob. 84, 11–47.Google Scholar
  41. Mayr, C. 1991. Europaische Vogelschutzgebiete in der BRD-Entwicklungen seit 1991. Ber. Dtsch. Sekt. IRV 30, 35–54.Google Scholar
  42. Menanteau, L. 1991. Zones Humides du Littoral de la Communauté Européenne Vues de l'Espace.Google Scholar
  43. Ministère de l'Environnement, Bulgarie. 1993. Plan National d'Actions Prioritaires de Conservation des Zones Humides les plus Importantes de Bulgarie. Ministère de l'Environnement, Bulgarie.Google Scholar
  44. Ministère de L'Environment, Paris, 1987, Les Zones Humides de Lorraine. Délégation à la Qualité de la Vie, Ministère de l'Environnement, Paris.Google Scholar
  45. Ministerio de Obras Publicas y Transportes, Madrid. 1991. Estudio de las Zonas Humedas de la Espana Peninsular: Inventario y Tipificacion. Documento de Sintesis.Google Scholar
  46. Ministry of Education of Ukraine, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, State Committee of Ukraine on Science and Technology. 1993. The list of the Wetlands of International Significance in the South of Ukraine. Melitopol, Ukraine.Google Scholar
  47. Ministry of the Environment, Rome. 1990. Inventory of Italian Ramsar Sites. Ministry of the Environment, Nature Convention Services, Rome.Google Scholar
  48. Ministry of the Environment and the National Forest and Nature Agency, Denmark. 1993. Danish report 1993 on the Ramsar Convention, Denmark and Greenland. International Conference on the Convention at Kushiro, Japan, June 1993.Google Scholar
  49. Montes, C. 1990. Estudio de las Zonas Humedas de la Espana Peninsular: Inventario y Tipification. INITEC, Direccion General de Obras Hidraulicas. Ministerio de Obras Publicas y Urbanismo. Madrid.Google Scholar
  50. Montes, C. & Bernués, M. Spain. In: Hecker, N. & Tomàs-Vives, P. (Eds), The status of wetland inventories in the Mediterranean region. MedWet project, ICN and IWRB. (in press).Google Scholar
  51. Montes, C. & Bifani, P. 1989. An Ecological and Economic Analysis of the Current Status of Spanish Wetlands. Department of Ecology, Autonomous University of Madrid. Spain, Report for OECD.Google Scholar
  52. Mu\czinić, J. Coratia. In: Hecker, N. & Tomàs-Vives, P. (Eds), The status of wetland inventories in the Mediterranean region. MedWet project, ICN and IWRB. (in press).Google Scholar
  53. Olney, P. J. S. 1965. Project MAR list of European and North African Wetlands of International Importance. IUCN New Series No. 5, Morges, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  54. Prentice, C. & Tomas-Vives, P. Inventory and monitoring of coastal wetlands in the Mediterranean: the development of a standardised approach. Proceedings of the 4th EUCC Congress, Marathon, 1993 (in press).Google Scholar
  55. Psilovikos, A. 1992. The prospective situation for wetlands and waterfowl in Greece. pp. 53–55. In: Finlayson, C. M., Hollis, G. E. and Davis, T. J. (eds.) Managing Mediterranean Wetlands and their Birds. Proc. Symp., Grado, Italy, 1991. IWRB Special Publication No. 20. Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  56. Ramsar Convention Bureau. 1990. Directory of Wetlands of International Importance. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  57. Ramsar Convention Bureau. 1993. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat. Proceedings of the 5th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Kushiro, Japan. Volume 3. Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  58. Rheinwald, G. 1990. Europaische Vogelschutzgebiete (IBA) in Deutschland. Ber. Dtsch. Skt. IRV 29, 19–42.Google Scholar
  59. Royal Institute for Natural Sciences, Belgium. 1987. Inventaire des Zones de Grands Intérêts pour la Conservation des Oiseaux Sauvages dans la Communauté Européenne. RINS, Belgium.Google Scholar
  60. Ruuhijarvi, R. 1983. The Finnish mire types and their regional distribution. In: Gore, A. J. P. (ed.) Mires: Swamp, Bog, Fen and Moor, B. Regional Studies. Ecosystems of the World, Vol 4B. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. pp. 47–68.Google Scholar
  61. Scott, D. A. 1989. Design of Wetland Data Sheet for Database of Ramser Sites. Mimeographed report to Ramsar Convention Bureau, Gland, Swizerland.Google Scholar
  62. Scott, D. A. 1980. A Preliminary Inventory of Wetlands of International Importance for Waterfowl in West Europe and Northwest Africa. IWRB, Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  63. Secretariat de la Faune et de la Flore. 1992. Listes Nationales et Régionales des Zones Naturelles d'Intérêt Ecologique, Faunistique et Floristique (ZNIEFF). Paris, France.Google Scholar
  64. Skokova, N. N. & Vinogradov, V. G. 1986. Waterfowl Habitat Conservation (Russian). Agropromizdat, Moscow.Google Scholar
  65. Sociedad Espanola de Ornitologia. 1987. Clasification de las Zonas Humedas Espanolas en Funcion de las Aves Acuaticas. SEO, Madrid, Vols 1 and 2.Google Scholar
  66. Struwe, B. & Nehls, H.-W. 1992. Ergebnisse der Internationalen Wasservogelzahlung im Januar 1990 an der Deutschen Ostseekuste. Seevogel 13, 17–28.Google Scholar
  67. Tsiouris, S. A. & Gerakis, P. A. 1991. Wetlands of Greece: values, alterations and conservation. WWF and Laboratory of Ecology, Faculty of Agriculture, Aristotelian University, Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
  68. Van Vessem, J. & Kuijken, E. 1986. Contribution to the Determination of Special Protection Areas for Bird Conservation in Flanders. Ministry of the Flemish Community, Belgium.Google Scholar
  69. Viksne, J. 1993. Important Bird Areas in Latvia. International Council for Bird Preservation, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  70. Waagepetersen, J. 1986. Restoration of Drained Lakes and Fjords in Denmark. Forest and Nature Agency, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
  71. Wilson, A. M. & Moser, M. E. (eds.) [1994] Conservation of Black Sea Wetlands: a preliminary action plan. IWRB Special Publication No. 33, IWRB, Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar
  72. Zalidis, G. C. 1993. The National Wetlands Inventory for Greece: Prospects and progress. pp. 178–184. In: Moser, M., Prentice, R. C. & van Vessem, J. (eds), Waterfowl and Wetland Conservation in the 1990s. IWRB Special Publication No. 26, IWRB, Slimbridge, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. M. R. Hughes
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations