, Volume 65, Issue 3, pp 179–189

Measures of resilience: the response of coastal sage scrub to fire

  • Walter E. Westman
  • John F. O'Leary


Measures of four components of resilience are developed and used to quantify the response of coastal sage scrub to fire in southern California: (1) elasticity (rate of recovery following disturbance), (2) amplitude (threshold of disturbance beyond which recovery to the original state no longer occurs), (3) malleability (extent of alteration of the new stable-state from the original) and (4) damping (extent and duration of oscillation in an ecosystem parameter following disturbance). Vegetation and soil properties measured before fire, and for the first 5–6 yr after fire on four coastal (Venturan association) and four inland (Riversidian association) sites of coastal sage were used to follow changes. In addition, results from a simulation model of post-fire succession in Venturan coastal sage scrub (the FINICS model of Malanson) were used to examine resilience behavior over a 200 yr period. Resilience behavior of coastal sage scrub is critically influenced by the presence of a competitive mix of inherently strongly and weakly resprouting species. Sites dominated by weak resprouters exhibit lower elasticity and less damping of year-to-year fluctuations in composition in the early post-fire years. Sites with a mixture of weak and strong resprouters have a lower threshold of disturbance (amplitude) before species extirpation occurs, a result intensified by a higher frequency of disturbance. Malleability is also greater in these systems under higher disturbance frequency.


California Coastal sage scrub Disturbance theory Fire Mediterranean-climate ecosystems Modeling Resilience 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Albini, F. A., 1976. Computer-based models of wildland fire behavior: a user's manual. U.S.D.A. For. Serv. Intermountain For. & Range Expt. Sta., Ogden, UT.Google Scholar
  2. Austin, M. P., 1977. Use of ordination and other multivariate descriptive methods to study succession. Vegetatio 35: 165–175.Google Scholar
  3. Bauer, H. L., 1943. The statistical analysis of chaparral and other plant communities by means of transect samples. Ecology 24: 45–60.Google Scholar
  4. DeBano, L. F., 1981. Water repellant soils: a state-of-the-art. U.S.D.A. For. Serv. Pacific S.W. For. & Range Expt. Sta. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-46. Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  5. Dell, B. & Lamont, B. (eds), 1986. Resilience of Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Junk, Dordrecht. In press.Google Scholar
  6. Fox, M. & Fox, B., 1986. Responses by plant and animal communities to man-induced disturbance. In: B.Dell & B.Lamont (eds), Resilience of Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Junk, Dordrecht. In press.Google Scholar
  7. Grime, J. P., 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  8. Hill, M. O., 1979. TWINSPAN. A FORTRAN program for arranging multivariate data in an ordered two-way table by classification of the individuals and attributes. Section of Ecology and Systematics, Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
  9. Hill, M. O. & Gauch, H. G.Jr., 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.Google Scholar
  10. Keeley, J. & Keeley, S. C., 1981. Post-fire regeneration of southern California chaparral. Amer. J. Bot. 68: 524–530.Google Scholar
  11. Keeley, J. & Keeley, S. C. 1984. Postfire recovery of California coastal sage scrub. Amer. Midl. Nat. 111: 105–117.Google Scholar
  12. Keeley, S. C., Keeley, J. E., Hutchinson, S. M. & Johnson, A. W., 1981. Postfire succession of the herbaceous flora in southern California chaparral. Ecology 62: 1608–1621.Google Scholar
  13. Malanson, G. P., 1983. A model of post-fire succession in Californian coastal sage scrub. Dissertation, Univ. California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  14. Malanson, G. P., 1984a. Linked Leslie matrices for the simulation of succession. Ecol. Modelling 21: 13–20.Google Scholar
  15. Malanson, G. P., 1984b. Fire history and patterns of Venturan subassociations of Californian coastal sage scrub. Vegetatio 57: 121–128.Google Scholar
  16. Malanson, G. P., 1985. Simulation of competition between alternative shrub life history strategies through recurrent fires. Ecol. Modelling 27: 271–283.Google Scholar
  17. Malanson, G. P. & O'Leary, J. F., 1982. Post-fire regeneration strategies of Californian coastal sage shrubs. Oecologia 53: 355–358.Google Scholar
  18. Malanson, G. P. & Westman, W. E., 1985. Post-fire succession in Californian coastal sage scrub: the role of continual basal sprouting. Amer. Midl. Nat. 113: 309–318.Google Scholar
  19. Nilsen, E. T. & Muller, W. H., 1981. Phenology of the drought-deciduous shrub Lotus scoparius: climatic controls and adaptive significance. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 323–341.Google Scholar
  20. O'Leary, J. F., 1984. Environmental factors influencing post-burn vegetation in a southern California shrubland. Dissertation. Univ. California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  21. Orians, G. H., 1975. Diversity, stability and maturity in natural ecosystems. In: W. H.vanDobben & R. H.Lowe-McConnell (eds), Unifying concepts in ecology, pp. 64–65. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  22. Rundel, P. W., 1983. Role of fire in nutrient cycles of Mediterranean-type ecosystems, with reference to chaparral. In: F. J.Kruger, D. T.Mitchell & J. U. M.Jarvis (eds). Mediterranean-type Ecosystems. The Role of Nutrients, pp. 192–207. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
  23. Trabaud, L. & Lepart, J., 1980. Diversity and stability in garrigue ecosystems after fire. Vegetatio 43: 49–57.Google Scholar
  24. Van derMaarel, E., 1969. On the use of ordination methods in phytosociology. Vegetatio 23: 45–69.Google Scholar
  25. Westman, W. E., 1978. Measuring the inertia and resilience of ecosystems. BioScience 28: 705–710.Google Scholar
  26. Westman, W. E., 1981a. Diversity relations and succession in Californian coastal sage scrub. Ecology 62: 170–184.Google Scholar
  27. Westman, W. E., 1981b. Factors influencing the distribution of species of Californian coastal sage scrub. Ecology 62: 439–455.Google Scholar
  28. Westman, W. E., 1981c. Seasonal dimorphism of foliage in Californian coastal sage scrub. Oecologia 51: 385–388.Google Scholar
  29. Westman, W. E., 1982. Coastal sage scrub succession. In: Proc. Symp. Dynamics and management of Mediterranean-type ecosystems, pp. 91–99. U.S.D.A. For. Serv. Pacific S.W. For. & Range Expt. Sta. Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-58, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  30. Westman, W. E., 1983a. Xeric Mediterranean-type shrubland associations of Alta and Baja California and the community/continuum debate. Vegetatio 52: 3–19.Google Scholar
  31. Westman, W. E., 1983b. Island biogeography: studies on the xeric shrublands of the inner Channel Islands, California. J. Biogeogr. 10: 97–118.Google Scholar
  32. Westman, W. E., 1985. Ecology, impact assessment, and environmental planning. Wiley-Interscience, NY.Google Scholar
  33. Westman, W. E., 1986. Resilience: concepts and measures: In: B.Dell & B.Lamont (eds), Resilience in Mediterranean-type ecosystems. Junk, Dordrecht. In press.Google Scholar
  34. Westman, W. E. & Rogers, R. W., 1977. Biomass and structure of a coastal subtropical eucalypt forest, North Stradbroke Island. Aust. J. Bot. 25: 171–191.Google Scholar
  35. Westman, W. E., O'Leary, J. F. & Malanson, G. P., 1981. The effects of fire intensity, aspect and substrate on post-fire growth of Californian coastal sage scrub. In: N. S.Margaris & H. A.Mooney (eds), Components of productivity of Mediterranean-climate regions: basic and applied aspects, pp. 151–179. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  36. Zedler, P. H., Gautier, C. R. & McMaster, G. S., 1983. Vegetation change in response to extreme events: the effect of a short interval between fires in California chaparral and coastal scrub. Ecology 64: 809–818.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1986

Authors and Affiliations

  • Walter E. Westman
    • 1
  • John F. O'Leary
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.NASA Ames Research Center, M.S. 242/4Moffett FieldUSA
  3. 3.Department of GeographySan Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations