Hydrobiologia

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 287–299 | Cite as

Taxonomy of lakes

  • A. R. Zafar
Article

Summary

It has been pointed out that the terms ‘Eutrophic’ and ‘Oligotrophic’ adopted to classify the lakes are usually found by many workers to be quite inadequate and very often ambiguous. This presumably may be due to the fact that these terms at a time take many characters of a lake into consideration. This is the reason that application of these to different bodies of water becomes very difficult. Moreover, the other innumerable terms of nomenclature proposed by various workers are equally difficult in application because the shades of their meaning so often overlap each other. Much of the confusion could be avoided if one could define ‘trophy’ as suggested by Faegri, exclusively on the physico-chemical nature of the lake-water. In view of this, a scheme to classify waters on the basis of Pearsall's basic ratio and N, P, and humus contents has been proposed.

It has also been pointed out that if lakes are to be differentiated on the basis of their ecology, various categories will have to be created since no two freshwater bodies can be expected to be exactly identical in their ecological behaviour. This, obviously leads one to think in terms of coining a separate ecological nomenclature for various lake-types within the frame-work of trophic system.

In this paper an attempt has been made to develop a system of nomenclature more or less similar to the binomeal system of Linnaeus. The proposed names are composed of three components, each almost self-explanatory, and these put together provide relevant ecological information pertaining to a lake.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Birge, E. A. & C. Juday - 1922 - The inland lakes of Wisconsin: The plankton. I. Its quantity and chemical composition; Bull. Wis. Geol. Nat. Hist. Surv. 64, 1–222.Google Scholar
  2. Birge, E. A. & C. Juday - 1934 - Particulate and dissolved organic matter in inland lakes; Ecol. Monogr. 4, 440–74.Google Scholar
  3. Brett, J. R. - 1950 - The Physical Limnology of Lakelse Lake, British Columbia; J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 8 (2), 82–102.Google Scholar
  4. Faegri, K. - 1954 - Some Reflections on the Trophic System in Limnology; Nytt Mag. for Bot. 3, 43–9.Google Scholar
  5. Good, R. - 1953 - The Geography of the Flowering Plants; Longmans, Green and Co. Lond., pp. xiv + 452.Google Scholar
  6. Harvey, H. W. - 1934 - Measurement of Phytoplankton Population; J. Mar. biol. Ass., U.K. 19, 761–73.Google Scholar
  7. Hooper, F. - 1951 - Limnological Features of a Minnesota Seepage Lake; Amer. Midland Nat. 46 (2), 467–81.Google Scholar
  8. Lohmann, H. - 1908 - Untersuchungen Zur Feststellung des vollständigen Gehaltes des Meeres an Plankton. Wissensch. Meeresunters. 10. Kiel.Google Scholar
  9. Ludbeck, J. - 1934 - Über den “primär oligotrophen” Seetypus und den Wollingster See als dessen mitteleuropäischen Vertreter; Arch. Hydrobiol. 27, 221–49.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, N. V. - 1955 - Limnological and Biological observations in the Region of the Ungava or Chubb Crater, Province of Quebec; J. Fish Res. Bd. Can. 12 (4), 487–98.Google Scholar
  11. Näumann, E. - 1919-“Nagra Synpunkter angaende Limnoplanktons Oekologie“; Svensk. bot. Tidskr. 13, 129–61.Google Scholar
  12. Pearsall, W. H. - 1923 - A theory of diatom periodicity. J. Ecol. 11 (2), 165–83.Google Scholar
  13. Pennak, R. W. - 1955 - Comparative Limnology of Eight Colorado Mountain Lakes; Univ. Colo. Stud. Biol. No. 2, 1–75.Google Scholar
  14. Pesta, O. - 1929 - Der Hochgebirgssee der Alpen; Die Binnengewasser, 8, 1–156.Google Scholar
  15. Rawson, D. S. - 1957 - Limnology and Fisheries of Five Lakes in the Upper Churchill Drainage, Saskatchewan, Fisheries Branch, Dept. of Nat. Res. Sask. Fish. Rept. 3, 1–61.Google Scholar
  16. Ricker, W. E. - 1952 - The Benthos of Cultus Lake; J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 9 (4), 204–12.Google Scholar
  17. Steeman-Nielsen - 1952 - The use of radioactive carbon (C14) for measuring organic production in the sea; J. Couns. Int. l'Explor. de la Mer. 18, 117.Google Scholar
  18. Strøm, K. M. - 1930 - Limnological observations on Norwegian Lakes; Arch. f. Hydrobiol. 21, 97–124.Google Scholar
  19. Thienemann, A. - 1925 - Die Binnengewässer Mitteleuropas. Stuttgart. (Summary only).Google Scholar
  20. Thomasson, K. - 1956 - Reflections on Arctic and Alpine Lakes; Oikos, 7 (1); 117–43.Google Scholar
  21. Welch, P. S. - 1948 - Limnological Methods; Balkiston Philadelphia, U.S.A., pp. xvii + 381.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk Den Haag 1959

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. R. Zafar
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Fellow (Government of India), Hydrobiological Laboratory, Department of BotanyOsmania UniversityHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations