Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 29, Issue 4, pp 703–710 | Cite as

Activity of single-stranded DNA endonucleases in mung bean is associated with cell division

  • Gideon Grafi
  • Brian A. Larkins
Research Article

Abstract

A single-strand-specific endonuclease from mung bean sprouts is widely usedin molecular biology. However, the biological role of this enzyme is unknown. We studied the spatial and temporal activity of single-stranded DNA endonucleases in mung bean seedling by following enzyme activity that linearizes supercoiled plasmid DNA, a characteristic of this type of enzyme. The formation of a linear molecule from supercoiled DNA was found to occur in two distinguishable steps. The first, which involves introducing a nick into the supercoiled DNA and relaxing it, is very rapid and complete within a few seconds. The second step of cleaving the opposite strand to generate a unit-length linear duplex DNA is a relatively slow process. Analysis of the DNA cleavage sites showed the nuclease preferentially cuts supercoiled DNA at an AT-rich region. Varying levels of nuclease activity could be detected in different tissues of the mung bean seedling. The highest activity was in the root tip and was correlated with histone H1 kinase activity. This implies a link between nuclease activity and cell division. Induction of cell division in mung bean hypocotyls with auxin promoted formation of root primordia and considerably increased the activity of single-stranded DNA endonucleases. The nuclease activity and histone H1 kinase activity were reduced in mung bean cuttings treated with hydroxyurea, but not in cuttings treated with oryzalin. The potential function of single-stranded DNA endonucleases is discussed.

Key words

mung bean single-stranded DNA endonuclease AT-rich region cell division 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Asai T, Takanami M, Imai M: The AT richness and gid transcription determine the left border of the replication origin of the E. coli chromosome. EMBO J 9: 4065–4072 (1990).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beard P, Morrow JF, Berg P: Cleavage of circular superhelical simian virus 40 DNA to a linear duplex by S1 Nuclease. J Virol 12: 1303–1313 (1973).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Boulikas T: Homeodomain protein binding sites, inverted repeats, and nuclear matrix attachment regions along the human beta-globin gene complex. J Cell Biochem 52: 23–36 (1993).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brack C, Bickle TA, Yuman R: The relation of the single-stranded regions in bacteriophage PM2 supercoiled DNA to the early melting sequences. J Mol Biol 96: 693–702 (1975).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown DR, Hurwitz J, Reinberg D, Zipursky SL: Nuclease activities involved in DNA replication. In: Linn SM, Roberts RJ (eds) Nucleases, pp. 187–209. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cleaver JE: It was a very good year for DNA repair. Cell 76: 1–4 (1994).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dunphy WG, Newport JW: Unraveling of mitotic control mechanisms. Cell 55: 925–928 (1988).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Frankfort HM, Robertson HD: Ribonucleases. In: Linn SM, Roberts RJ (eds) Nucleases, pp. 359–366. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friedberg EC, Siede W, Cooper AJ: In: Broach JR, Pringle JR, Jones EW (eds) The Molecular Biology of the Yeast Saccharomyces: Genome Dynamics, Protein Synthesis and Energetics, pp. 147–192. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1991).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Funnell BE, Inman RB: Comparison of partial denaturation maps with the known sequence of simian virus 40 and phi X174 replicative form DNA. J Mol Biol 131: 331–340 (1979).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gasser SM: Replication origins, factors and attachment sites. Curr Opin Cell Biol 3: 407–413 (1991).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gasser SM, Amati BB, Cardenas ME, Hofmann JF: Studies on scaffold attachment sites and their relation to genome function. Int Rev Cytol 119: 57–96 (1989).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grafi G, Meller E, Sher N, Sela I: Characterization of S1/mung bean type nuclease activity in plant cell suspensions. Plant Sci 74: 107–114 (1991).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Habraken Y, Sung P, Prakash L, Prakash S: Yeast excision repair gene RAD2 encodes a single-stranded DNA endonuclease. Nature 366: 365–368 (1993).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hwang DS, Kornberg A: Opposed actions of regulatory proteins, DnaA and LciA, in opening the replication origin of Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 267: 23087–23091 (1992).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Inman RB, Schnos M: Partial denaturation of thymine and 5-bromouracil-containing λDNA in alkali. J Mol Biol 49: 93–98 (1970).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson PH, Laskowski MSr: Mung Bean Nuclease I. J Biol Chem 245: 891–898 (1970).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kowalski D, Kroeker WD, Laskowski MSr: Mung bean nuclease I. Physical, chemical and catalytic properties. Biochemistry 15: 4457–4463 (1976).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kowalski D, Sanford JP: Action of mung bean nucleases. J Biol Chem 257: 7820–7825 (1982).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kroeker WD, Kowalski D: Gene-sized pieces produced by digestion of linear duplex DNA with mung bean nuclease. Biochemistry 17: 3236–3243 (1978).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kubiak JZ, Weber M, de Pennart H, Winston NJ, Maro B: The metaphase II arrest in mouse oocytes is controlled through microtubule-dependent destruction of cyclin b in the presence of CSF. EMBO J 12: 3773–3778 (1993).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Laskowski MSr: Purification and properties of the mung bean nuclease. Meth Enzymol 65: 263–276 (1980).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    McCutchan TF, Hansen JL, Dame JB, Mullins JA: Mung bean nuclease cleaves Plasmodium genomic DNA at sites before and after genes. Science 225: 625–628 (1984).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Modrich P: Mechanisms and biological effects of mismatch repair. Annu Rev Genet 25: 229–253 (1991).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Morejohn LC, Bureau TE, Mole-Bajer J, Bajer AS, Fosket DE Oryzalin, a dinitroaniline herbicide, binds to plant tubulin and inhibits microtubule polymerization in vitro. Planta 172: 252–264 (1987).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Murray AW, Kirschner MW: Dominoes and clocks: the union of two views of the cell cycle. Science 246: 614–621 (1989).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Nurse P: Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase. Nature 344: 503–508 (1990).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Shishido K, Ando T: Single strand-specific nucleases. In: Linn SM, Roberts RJ (eds) Nucleases, pp. 155–186. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tomkinson AE, Bardwell AJ, Bardwell L, Tappe NJ, Friedberg EC: Yeast DNA repair and recombination proteins Rad1 and Rad10 constitute a single-stranded-DNA endonuclease. Nature 362: 860–862 (1993).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yanisch-Perron C, Vieira J, Messing J: Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33: 103–119 (1985).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publisher 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gideon Grafi
    • 1
  • Brian A. Larkins
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant SciencesUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations