Advertisement

Plant Growth Regulation

, Volume 16, Issue 1, pp 93–97 | Cite as

Effects of 1-MCP on the vase life and ethylene response of cut flowers

  • Margrethe Serek
  • Edward C. Sisler
  • Michael S. Reid
Article

Abstract

Pretreatment for 6 h with low concentrations of 1-MCP (1-Methylcyclopropene, formerly designated as SIS-X), a cyclic ethylene analog, inhibits the normal wilting response of cut carnations exposed continuously to 0.4 μl·l−1 ethylene. The response to 1-MCP was a function of treatment concentration and time. Treatment with 1-MCP was as effective in inhibiting ethylene effects as treatment with the anionic silver thiosulfate complex (STS), the standard commercial treatment. Other ethylene-sensitive cut flowers responded similarly to carnations. In the presence of 1 μl·l−1 ethylene, the vase life of 1-MCP-treated flowers was up to 4 times that of the controls.

Key words

abscission Alstroemeria Antirrhinum Consolida Dianthus ethylene binding flower senescence 1-MCP 1-Methylcyclopropene Matthiola Penstemon SIS-X silver thiosulfate 

Abbreviations

1-MCP

1-Methylcyclopropene

STS

silver thiosulfate

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nell TA (1992) Taking silver safely out of the longevity picture. Grower Talks June: 35–38Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Serek M, Sisler EC and Reid MS (1994a) A volatile ethylene inhibitor improves the post-harvest life of potted roses. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 119:572–577Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Serek M, Sisler EC and Reid MS (1994b) Novel gaseous inhibitor of ethylene binding prevents ethylene effects in potted flowering plants. J Am Soc Hortic Sci (In press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reid MS, Paul JL, Farhoomand MB, Kofranek AM and Staby GL (1980) Pulse treatments with the silver thiosulfate complex extend the vase life of cut carnations. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 105: 25–27Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheng Y and Prusoff WH (1973) Relationship between the inhibitor constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50% inhibition (I50) of an enzymatic reaction. Biochem Pharmacol 22: 3099–3108Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Prescan E, Porumb H and Lascu I (1989) Potential misinter-pretation of competitive binding assays. Trends Biochem Sci 14: 443–444Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Margrethe Serek
    • 1
  • Edward C. Sisler
    • 2
  • Michael S. Reid
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental HorticultureUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiochemistryNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA

Personalised recommendations