Euphytica

, Volume 80, Issue 3, pp 191–199 | Cite as

Performance of durum wheat landraces in a Mediterranean environment (eastern Sicily)

  • Luciano Pecetti
  • Gaetano Boggini
  • John Gorham
Article

Summary

The evaluation aimed at identifying landrace genotypes adapted to the rather unfavourable growing conditions of durum wheat in Sicily, to be used as parental material in a breeding programme. The trial was carried out in three seasons experiencing varying climatic conditions, and included 75 landraces, 25 of which were selected under severe drought in Syria. Wide differences were observed for most traits among genotypes and seasons of evaluation. Yields of the best performing entries identified in each season never significantly differed from that of the best check variety. The top-yielding landraces were consistently better than the remaining entries for the three yield components, viz. number of spikes per plant, number of kernels per spike and mean kernel weight. In the driest season they were also significantly earlier in heading, confirming the importance of earliness under drought. An analytical breeding approach relying on an array of morpho-physiological traits as selection criteria did not seem appropriate for the given environment, as the variable stress level enhanced the importance of specific traits under specific situations. The genotypic response was largely season-specific. Nonetheless, five landraces were in the best group in all seasons. The selection made in Syria also appeared somewhat effective in Sicily, particularly in the less favourable seasons.

Key words

drought resistance durum wheat landraces Mediterranean environment Sicily Triticum turgidum conv. durum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acevedo, E. & S. Ceccarelli, 1989. Role of the physiologist-breeder in a breeding program for drought resistance conditions. In: F.W.G. Baker (Ed.). Drought resistance in cereals, pp. 117–139. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  2. Ali Dib, T., P. Monneveux & J.L. Araus, 1990. Breeding durum wheat for drought tolerance: analytical, synthetical approaches and their connections. In: I. Panayotov & S. Pavlova (Eds). Proc. Symp. Wheat Breeding-Prospects and Future Approaches, pp. 224–240. Varna, Bulgaria.Google Scholar
  3. Annicchiarico, P. & L. Pecetti, 1988. Primi risultati della valutazione di una collezione mondiale di frumento duro. L'Informatore Agrario 44: 35–43.Google Scholar
  4. Annicchiarico, P. & L. Pecetti, 1990. Visual evaluation of drought tolerance in durum wheat germplasm under field conditions: efficacy and comparison of scores of different complexity. Cereal Res. Comm. 18: 67–74.Google Scholar
  5. Annicchiarico, P. & L. Pecetti, 1993. Contribution of some agronomic traits to durum wheat performance in a dry Mediterranean region of Northern Syria. Agronomie 13: 25–34.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, F.W.G. (Ed.), 1989. Drought resistance in cereals. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  7. Boggini, G., M. Palumbo & F. Calcagno, 1990. Characterization and utilization of Sicilian landraces of durum wheat in breeding programs. In: J.P. Srivastava & A.B. Damania (Eds), Wheat Genetic Resources: Meeting Diverse Needs, pp. 223–234, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  8. Boggini, G., P. Annicchiarico, A. Longo & L. Pecetti, 1992. Produttività e adattamento di nuove costituzioni di frumento duro. Rivista di Agronomia 26: 482–488.Google Scholar
  9. Ceccarelli, S. & S. Grando, 1991. Environment of selection and type of germplasm in barley breeding for low-yielding conditions. Euphytica 57: 207–219.Google Scholar
  10. Ceccarelli, S., M.M. Nachit, G. Ortiz Ferrara, M.S. Mekni, M. Tanir, J.van Leur & J.P. Srivastava, 1987. Breeding strategies for improving cereal yield and stability under drought. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds). Drought tolerance in winter cereals, pp. 104–114. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  11. Ceccarelli, S., E. Acevedo & S. Grando, 1991. Breeding for yield stability in unpredictable environments: single traits, interaction between traits, and architecture of genotypes. Euphytica 56: 169–185.Google Scholar
  12. Clarke, J.M., I. Romagosa & R.M. DePauw, 1991. Screening durum wheat germplasm for dry growing conditions: morphological and physiological criteria. Crop Sci. 31: 770–775.Google Scholar
  13. Daaloul, A., M. Harrabi, K. Ammar & M. Abdennadher, 1990. Evaluation of durum wheat lines for yield, drought tolerance and Septoria resistance in Tunisia. In: J.P. Srivastava & A.B. Damania (Eds), Wheat Genetic Resources: Meeting Diverse Needs, pp. 187–194. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  14. Duwayri, M., A.M. Tell & F. Shqaief, 1987. Breeding for improved yield in moisture-limiting areas: the experience of Jordan. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds), Drought Tolerance in Winter Cereals, pp. 163–169. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  15. Evans, L.T., J. Bingham, P. Jackson & J. Sutherland, 1972. Effect of awns and drought on the supply of photosynthate and its distribution within wheat ears. Ann. Appl. Biol. 70: 67–76.Google Scholar
  16. Foti, S., S. Cassaniti & G.M. Lombardo, 1988. Profilo agronomico della granicoltura siciliana. In: Atti Conv. II Grano Duro per la Panificazione, pp. 87–115. CE.S.O.E.T., Catania, Italy.Google Scholar
  17. Lin, S.C. & G. Poushinsky, 1983. A modified augmented design for an early stage of plant selection involving a large number of test lines without replications. Biometrics 39: 553–561.Google Scholar
  18. Pecetti, L. & P. Annicchiarico, 1991. Yield potential under moderately favourable conditions, drought tolerance, resistance to yellow rust and to common bunt in a world collection of durum wheat. J. Genet. & Breed. 45: 207–214.Google Scholar
  19. Pecetti, L., A.B. Damania & S. Jana, 1992. Practical problems in large-scale germplasm evaluation. A case study in durum wheat. FAO/IBPGR Pl. Genet. Res. Newsl. 88/89: 5–10.Google Scholar
  20. Richards, R.A., 1982. Breeding and selecting for drought resistance in wheat. In: Drought resistance in crops with emphasis on rice, pp. 303–316. International Rice Research Institute (IRRI), Manila, The Philippines.Google Scholar
  21. Richards, R.A., 1987. Physiology and the breeding of winter-grown cereals for dry areas. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds). Drought tolerance in winter cereals, pp. 133–150. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  22. Richards, R.A., 1989. Breeding for drought resistance—physiological approaches. In: F.W.G. Baker (Ed.). Drought resistance in cereals, pp. 65–79. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  23. Srivastava, J.P., 1987. Barley and wheat improvement for moisture-limiting areas in West Asia and North Africa. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds). Drought tolerance in winter cereals, pp. 65–78. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Turner, N.C. & M.E. Nicolas, 1987. Drought resistance of wheat for light-textured soils in a Mediterranean climate. In: J.P. Srivastava, E. Porceddu, E. Acevedo & S. Varma (Eds). Drought tolerance in winter cereals, pp. 203–216. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luciano Pecetti
    • 1
  • Gaetano Boggini
    • 2
  • John Gorham
    • 3
  1. 1.International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA)AleppoSyria
  2. 2.Experimental Institute for Cereal ResearchBranch of CataniaCataniaItaly
  3. 3.School of Biological SciencesUniversity of Wales, BangorBangorUK

Personalised recommendations