Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 169–175 | Cite as

An evaluation of antibiotics for the elimination ofXanthomonas campestris pv.pelargonii (Brown) fromPelargonium x domesticum cv. ‘Grand Slam’ explants in vitro

  • Carol Barrett
  • Alan C. Cassells
Original Research Paper

Abstract

A range of antibiotics was evaluated for activity againstXanthomonas campestris pv.pelargonii (Xep) on diagnostic sensitivity testing and plant tissue culture media. Many of the antibiotics showed reduced or no activity on the latter. Tetracycline and cefotaxime, chosen for further investigation, were screened for light stability under plant culture regimes. Tetracycline was inactivated in photosynthetic photon fluxes of 22 μmol m-2 s-1 and above. The minimum bacteriocidal concentration of cefotaxime was determined in bacteriological and plant tissue culture media. Cefotaxime was further tested for phytoxicity and ability to eliminate Xcp from deliberately infected explants. Cefotaxime was shown to eliminate contamination and stimulate the growth of the plant tissue cultures up 500 mg l-1.

Key words

bacterial contamination cefotaxime tissue culture 

Abbreviations

DST

diagnostic sensitivity testing medium

MBC

minimum bacteriocidal concentration

TCM

half-strength Murashige & Skoog (1962) basal plant tissue culture medium

Xcp

Xanthomonas campestris pv.pelargonii

BA

benzyladenine

2,4-d

2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

OD

optical density

PPF

photosynthetic photon flux

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bastaiens L, Maene L, Harbaoui Y, Van Sumere C, Van De Castelle KL & Debergh PC (1983) The influence of antibacterial products on plant tissue cultures. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent 48: 13–24Google Scholar
  2. Bechte RM & Scherr GH (1958) A new agar for in vitro antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Antibiotics and Chemotherapy 8: 599–606Google Scholar
  3. Bondi A, Spauling EH, Smith ED & Dietz CC (1947) A routine method for the rapid determinaiton of susceptibility to penicillin and other antibiotics. Amer. J. Med. 214: 221–225Google Scholar
  4. Boxus PH & Terzi JM (1987) Big losses due to bacterial contamination can be avoided in mass propagation scheme. Acta Hort. 212: 91–93Google Scholar
  5. Cassells AC (1986) Production of healthy plants. In: Alderson PG & Dullforce WM (Eds) Micropropagation in Horticulture (pp 53–71). University of Nottingham, Trent Print Unit, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  6. Cassells AC (1991a) Problems in tissue culture: culture contamination. In: Debergh PC & Zimmerman RH (Eds) Micropropagation (pp 31–44). Kluwer DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  7. Cassells AC (1991b) Screening for pathogens and contaminating organisms in mircopropagation. In: Duncan JM & Torrance L (Eds) Techniques for the Rapid Diagnosis of Plant Pathogens (pp 179–191). Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassells AC & Carney BF (1987) Adventitious regeneration inPelargonium x domesticum Bailey. Acta Hort. 212: 419–423Google Scholar
  9. Cassells AC, Harmey MA, Carney BF, McCarthy E & McHugh A (1988) Problems posed by cultivable bacteria and endophytes in the establishment of axenic cultures ofPelargonium x domesticum: the use ofXanthomonas pelargonii specific ELISA, DNA probes and culture indexing in the screening of antibiotic treated and untreated donor plants. Acta Hort. 225: 153–162Google Scholar
  10. Cornu D & Michel MF (1987) Bacteria contaminants in shoot cultures ofPrunus avium L. choice and phytotoxicity of antibiotics. Acta Hort. 212: 83–86Google Scholar
  11. Debergh PC & Maene LJ (1981) A scheme for commercial propagation of ornamental plants by tissue culture. Scientia Horta. 14: 335–345Google Scholar
  12. Dodds JH & Roberts LW (1981) Some inhibitory effects of gentamicin on plant tissue cultures. In Vitro 17: 467–470Google Scholar
  13. Falkiner FR (1988) Strategy for the selection of antibiotics for use against common bacterial pathogens and endophytes of plants. Acta Hort. 225: 53–57Google Scholar
  14. Falkiner FR (1990) The criteria for choosing an antibiotic for control of bacteria in plant tissue culture. Int. Assoc. Plant Tissue Culture Newsl. 60: 13–23Google Scholar
  15. Garrod LP, Lambert HP & O'Grady F (1973) Antibiotics and Chemotherapy (pp 145) Churchill Livingstone, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  16. Leifert C (1990) Contaminants of plant tissue cultures. PhD thesis, University of Nottingham, NottinghamGoogle Scholar
  17. Leifert C & Waites WM (1990) Contaminants of plant tissue cultures. Int. Assoc. Plant Tissue Culture Newsl. 60: 2–13Google Scholar
  18. Leifert C, Camotta H, Wright SM, Waites B, Chayne V & Waites WM (1991) Elimination ofLactobacillus plantarum, Corynebacterium spp.,Staphylococcus saprophyticus andPseudomonas paucimobilis from micropropagatedHemerocallis, Choisya andDelphinium cultures using antibiotics. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 71: 307–330Google Scholar
  19. Long RD, Curtin TF & Cassells AC (1988) An investigation of the effects of bacterial contamination of potato nodal cultures. Acta Hort. 225: 83–91Google Scholar
  20. Mathias RJ & Boyd LA (1986) Cefotaxime stimulates callus growth, embryogenesis and regeneration in hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Sci. 46: 212–223Google Scholar
  21. Mathias RJ & Mukasa C (1987) The effect of cefotaxime on the growth and regeneration of callus from four varieties of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Cell Rep. 6: 454–457Google Scholar
  22. Menard D, Coumans M & Gaspar T (1985) Micropropagation duPelargonium a partir de meristemes. Med. Fac. Landbouww, Rijksuniv. Gent 50(2A): 327–331Google Scholar
  23. Murashige T & Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and biossays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant. 15: 473–497Google Scholar
  24. Pollock K, Barfield DG & Shields R (1983) The toxicity of antibiotics to plant cell cultures. Plant Cell Rep. 2: 36–39Google Scholar
  25. Sabath LD, Gerstein DA & Finland M (1968) Enhanced activity of novobiocin against gram negativeBacilli in acid media. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 398–404Google Scholar
  26. Schaad NW (1980) A Laboratory Guide for the Indentification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. American Phytopathological Society, MinnesotaGoogle Scholar
  27. Selwyn S (Ed) (1980) The Beta-lactam Antibiotics. Hodder and Stoughton, London, (pp 56–90)Google Scholar
  28. Severin K & Schoeffl (1990) Heat-inducible hygromycin-resistance in transgenic tobacco cell culture transformation usingAgrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Mol. Biol. 15: 827–833Google Scholar
  29. Stead DE (1988) Identification of bacteria by computer assisted fatty acid profiling. Acta Hort. 225: 39–46Google Scholar
  30. Thurston KC, Spencer SJ & Arditti J (1979) Phytotoxicity of fungicides and bacteriosides in orchid culture media. Amer. J. Bot. 66: 825–835Google Scholar
  31. van den Mooter M, Swings J, Cleene MD, Lyons F & De Ley J (1981) Susceptibility ofXanthomonas towards antibioticsin vitro. Med. Fac. Landbouww. Rijksuniv. Gent. 46: 3Google Scholar
  32. Young RM, Hutchins AS & Canfield ML (1984) Use of antibiotics to control bacteria in shoot cultures of woody plants. Plant Sci. Lett. 34: 203–209Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carol Barrett
    • 1
  • Alan C. Cassells
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Plant ScienceUniversity CollegeCorkIreland

Personalised recommendations