Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 303, Issue 1–3, pp 259–264 | Cite as

Land/Inland water ecotones: intermediate habitats critical for conservation and management

  • F. Schierner
  • M. Zalewski
  • J. E. Thorpe
Epilogue

Key words

aquatic resources management top down effects life history strategies population genetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agostinho, A. & M. Zalewski, 1995. The dependence of fish community structure and dynamics on floodplain and riparian ecotone zone in Parana River, Brazil, Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 141–148.Google Scholar
  2. Bretschko, G., 1995. River/land ecotones: scales and patterns. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 83–91.Google Scholar
  3. Coelho, M. M. & M. Zalewski, 1995. Evolutionary adaptations by fish to ecotonal complexity in spatially variable landscapes — a perspective. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 223–228.Google Scholar
  4. Dgebuadze, Y., 1995. The land/inland water ecotones and fish population of Lake Valley (West Mongolia). Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 237–247.Google Scholar
  5. Duncan, A. & J. Kubecka, 1995. Land/water ecotone effects in reservoirs on the fish fauna. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 11–30.Google Scholar
  6. Dunning, J. B., B. J. Danielson & H. R. Pulliam, 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65: 169–175.Google Scholar
  7. Frankel, O. H. & M. E. Soule, 1981. Conservation and evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 327 pp.Google Scholar
  8. Holland, M. M., 1988. SCOPE/MAB technical consultations on landscape boundaries. In: Di Castri (ed.). A new look at ecotones: Merging international projects on landscape boundaries. Biology International. Special issue 17: 47–106.Google Scholar
  9. Junk, W. J., P. B. Bayley & R. E. Sparks, 1989. The flood pluse concept in river-floodplain systems. In: D. P. Dodge (ed.), Proceedings of The International Large River Symposium. Can. Spec. Publ. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 106: 110–127.Google Scholar
  10. Jungwirth, M., S. Muhar & S. Schmutz, 1995. The effects of recreated instream and ecotone structures on the fish-fauna of an epipotamal river. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 195–206.Google Scholar
  11. Kolasa, J. & L. Weber, 1995. Relationship between the spatial scale and biotic variability in a wetland ecotone. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 61–67.Google Scholar
  12. Kolasa, J. & M. Zalewski, 1995. Notes on ecotone attributes and functions. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 1–7.Google Scholar
  13. Kirchhofer, A., 1995. Morphological variability in the ecotone — an important factor for the conservation of fish species richness in Swiss rivers. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 103–110.Google Scholar
  14. Matena, J., 1995. The role of ecotones as feeding grounds for fish fry in a Bohemian water supply reservoir. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 31–38.Google Scholar
  15. McQueen, D. J., M. R. S. Johannes, J. R. Post, T. J. Stewart & D. R. S. Lean, 1989. Bottom-up and top-down impacts on freshwater pelagic community structure. Ecol. Monogr. 59: 289–309.Google Scholar
  16. Muhar, S., S. Schmutz & M. Jungwirth, 1995. River restoration concepts-goals and perspectives. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 183–194.Google Scholar
  17. Naiman, R. J., H. Decamps, J. Pastor & C. A. Johnston, 1988. The potential importance of boundaries to fluvial ecosystems. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 7: 289–306.Google Scholar
  18. Nevo, E., 1988. Genetic diversity in nature. Patterns and theory. In: M. K. Hecht & B. Wallace (eds). Evol. Biol. 23: 217–246.Google Scholar
  19. Penczak, T., 1995. Effects of removal and regeneration of bankside vegetation on fish population dynamics in the Warta River, Poland. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 207–210.Google Scholar
  20. Power, G. & M. Power, 1995. Ecotones and fluvial regimes in arctic lotic environments. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 111–124.Google Scholar
  21. Rabeni, C. F. & M. A. Smale, 1995. Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zone. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 211–219.Google Scholar
  22. Salo, J., R. Kalliola, I. Hakkinen, Y. Makinen, P. Niemela, M. Puhakka & P. D. Coley, 1986. River dynamics and the diversity of Amazon lowland forests. Nature 322: 254–258.Google Scholar
  23. Schiemer, F., T. Spindler, H. Wintersberger, A. Schneider & A. Chovanec, 1991. Fish fry associations: Important indicators for the ecological status of large rivers, Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 2497–2500.Google Scholar
  24. Schiemer, F. & M. Zalewski, 1992: The importance of riparian ecotones for diversity and productivity of riverine fish communities. Neth. J. Zool. 42: 323–335.Google Scholar
  25. Schlosser, I. J., 1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 71–81.Google Scholar
  26. Shapiro J., V. Lamarra & M. Lynch, 1975. Biomanipulation: an ecosystem approach to lake restoration. Limnology Research Centre, University of Minnesota 143: 1–32.Google Scholar
  27. Shapiro, J. & D. I. Wright, 1984. Lake restoration by biomanipulation: Round Lake, Minnesota — the first two years. Freshwat. Biol. 14: 371–383.Google Scholar
  28. Simonian, A., I. Tátrai, P. Bíró, G. Paulovits, L. G.-Tóth & G. Lakatos, 1995. Biomass of planktonic crustaceans and the food of young cyprinids in the littoral zone of Lake Balaton. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 39–48.Google Scholar
  29. Wanzenböck, J. & K. Keresztessy, 1995. Zonation of a lentic ecotone and its correspondence to life history strategies in fish. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 249–257.Google Scholar
  30. Wetzel, R. G., 1990. Land-water interfaces: metabolic and limnological regulators. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 6–24.Google Scholar
  31. Vannote, R. L., G. W. Minshall, K. W. Cummins, J. R. Sedell & C. E. Cushing, 1980. The River Continuum Concept. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 130–137.Google Scholar
  32. Winemiller, K. O., 1992. Life-history strategies and the effectiveness of sexual selection. Oikos 63: 318–327.Google Scholar
  33. Zalewski, M., P. Frankiewicz & M. Nowak, 1995. Biomanipulation by ecotone management in a lowland reservoir. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 49–60.Google Scholar
  34. Zalewski, M., W. Puchalski, P. Frankiewicz & M. Nowak, 1991. The relation between primary production and fish biomass distribution in an upland river system. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 24: 2493–2496.Google Scholar
  35. Zweimüller, I., 1995. Microhabitat use by two small benthic stream fish in a 2nd order stream. Hydrobiologia 303 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 105): 125–138.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Schierner
    • 1
  • M. Zalewski
    • 2
  • J. E. Thorpe
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut für Zoologie der Universität WienViennaAustria
  2. 2.University of ŁódźInstitute of Applied EcologyŁódźPoland
  3. 3.SOAFD Freshwater Fisheries LaboratoryPitlochryUK

Personalised recommendations