Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 114, Issue 3, pp 177–187 | Cite as

Extraction of chlorophyll a from freshwater phytoplankton for spectrophotometric analysis

  • D. P. Sartory
  • J. U. Grobbelaar
Article

Abstract

The efficiency of pigment extraction forms the crux of the spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophyll a. The alcoholic solvents, methanol and ethanol, proved to be superior to acetone and acetone with DMSO. Homogenisation and sonication did not improve the extraction in the alcoholic solvents. Boiling at 100°C had an adverse effect whereas complete extraction of the pigments was obtained at the solvents boiling point and allowing the samples to stand for 24 h in the dark.

Keywords

chlorophyll a extraction solvents homogenisation boiling sonication 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacon, M. F. & M. Holden, 1967. Changes in chlorophylls resulting from various chemical and physical treatments of leaves and leaf extracts. Phytochem. 6: 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Burnison, B. K., 1980. Modified dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) extraction for chlorophyll analysis of phytoplankton. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 729–733.Google Scholar
  3. Daley, R. J., C. B. J. Gray & S. R. Brown, 1973. A quantitative, semiroutine method for determining alga and sedimentary chlorophyll derivatives. J. Fish. Res. Bd. Can. 30: 345–356.Google Scholar
  4. Garside, C. & J. P. Riley, 1969. A thin-layer chromatographic method for the determination of plant pigments in sea water and cultures. Analyt. chim. Acta 46: 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Lorenzen, C. J., 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and pheopigments: Spectrophotometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 343–346.Google Scholar
  6. Marker, A. F. H., 1972. The use of acetone and methanol in the estimation of chlorophyll in the presence of phaeophytin. Freshwat. Biol. 2: 361–385.Google Scholar
  7. Marker, A. F. H., E. A. Nusch, H. Rai & B. Riemann, 1980. The measurement of photosynthetic pigments in freshwaters and standardisation of methods: conclusions and recommendations. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih., Ergebn. Limnol. 14: 91–106.Google Scholar
  8. Moed, J. R. & G. M. Hallegraeff, 1978. Some problems in the estimation of chlorophyll a and phaeopigments from pre- and post-acidification spectrophotometric measurements. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. 63: 787–800.Google Scholar
  9. Nelson, D. J., 1960. Improved chlorophyll extraction method. Science 132: 351.Google Scholar
  10. Nusch, E. A., 1980. Comparison of methods for chlorophyll and phaeopigment determination. Arch. Hydrobiol. Beih., Ergebn. Limnol. 14: 14–36.Google Scholar
  11. Parsons, T. R. & J. D. H. Strickland, 1963. Discussion of spectrophotometric determination of marine plant pigments, with revised equations for ascertaining chlorophylls and carotenoids. J. mar. Res. 21: 155–163.Google Scholar
  12. Riemann, B., 1976. Studies on the biomass of the phytoplankton. Ph.D. thesis. Rep. bot. Inst., Univ. Aarhus, Rep. 1, 186 pp.Google Scholar
  13. Riemann, B., 1978. Absorption coefficients for chlorophylls a and b in methanol and a comment on interference of chlorophyll b in determinations of chlorophyll a. Vatten 3: 187–194.Google Scholar
  14. Sartory, D. P., 1982. Spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophyll a in freshwater phytoplankton. M.Sc. thesis. Univ. Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, Repub. S. Africa, 162 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Shoaf, W. T. & B. W. Lium, 1976. Improved extraction of chlorophyll a and b from algae using dimethyl sulphoxide. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 926–928.Google Scholar
  16. Snedecor, G. W. & W. G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical Methods, 6th ed. The Iowa State University Press, Iowa, U.S.A.: 258–338.Google Scholar
  17. Stanier, R. Y., R. Kunisawa, M. Mandel & G. Cohen-Bazire, 1971. Purification and properties of unicellular blue-green algae (order Chroococcales). Bact. Rev. 35: 171–205.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Steel, R. G. D. & J. H. Torrie, 1960. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill Book Co., N.Y.: 99–160.Google Scholar
  19. Steeman Nielsen, E., 1961. Chlorophyll concentration and rate of photosynthesis in Chlorella vulgaris. Physiol. Pl. 14: 868–876.Google Scholar
  20. Wintermans, J. F. G. M. & A. De Mots, 1965. Spectrophotometric characteristics of chlorophylls a and b and their phaeophytins in ethanol. Biochim. biophys. Acta 109: 448–453.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Youngman, R. E., 1978. The measurement of chlorophyll. Wat. Res. Centre tech. Rep. TR 82, Medmenham, U.K., 23 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr W. Junk Publishers 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. P. Sartory
    • 1
  • J. U. Grobbelaar
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Environment AffairsHydrological Research InstitutePretoriaRepublic of South Africa
  2. 2.Institute for Environmental SciencesUniversity of the Orange Free StateBloemfonteinRepublic of South Africa

Personalised recommendations