Advertisement

Vegetatio

, Volume 83, Issue 1–2, pp 97–110 | Cite as

Montane vegetation of the Mt. Field massif, Tasmania: a test of some hypotheses about properties of community patterns

  • Peter R. Minchin
Article

Abstract

direct gradient analysis was applied to the montane vegetation of the Mt. Field massif, Tasmania. Ecological response surface were constructed, describing the relationship between the mean % cover of each of 100 vascular plant species and two major environmental complex-gradients represented by soil drainage and altitude. The hypotheses tested were that: (1) the ecological responses of species are generally of Gaussian form; (2) the modes of ‘minor’ species have a uniform random distribution along gradients; (3) the modes of ‘major’ species are evenly distributed; (4) the frequency distribution over species of modal abundance is either lograndom or lognormal; and (5) alpha diversity has a unimodal trend along environmental gradients. The hypotheses were tested both for the full site of vascular species and for each of five species groups defined by structural form. Hypothesis (1) was rejected: only 45% of species had response surface which appeared unimodal and symmetric. Hypotheses (2) and (4) were rejected for the full set of species, but each was supported for all but one of the structural groups. The modes of herb species were clumped, rather than random and the frequency distribution of modal percentage cover for shrubs was inconsistent with both lograndom and lognormal hypotheses. Contrary to hypothesis (3), the modes of ‘major’ species were randomly distributed. Although total alpha diversity had a complex trend surface, the patterns for the alpha diversities of each structural group were unimodal, in accordance with hypothesis (5). The results suggest that an adequate model of community variation along environmental gradients must take into account differences in response patterns between species groups.

Keywords

Coenoplane Continuum concept Ecological response Ecoplane Gaussian model Gradient analysis Individualistic hypothesis Response surface 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AustinM. P. 1976. On non-linear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33: 33–41.Google Scholar
  2. AustinM. P. 1980. Searching for a model for use in vegetation analysis. Vegetatio 42: 11–21.Google Scholar
  3. AustinM. P. 1985. continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16: 39–61.Google Scholar
  4. AustinM. P. 1987. Models for analysis of species' response to environmental gradients. Vegetatio 69: 35–45.Google Scholar
  5. AustinM. P. & AustinB. O. 1980. Behaviour of experimental plant communities along a nutrient gradient. J. Ecol. 68: 891–918.Google Scholar
  6. AustinM. P. & CunninghamR. B. 1981. Observational analysis of environmental gradients. Proc. Ecol. Soc. Aust. 11: 109–119.Google Scholar
  7. AustinM. P., CunninghamR. B. & FlemingP. M. 1984. New approaches to direct gradient analysis using environmental scalars and statistical curve-fitting procedures. Vegetatio 55: 11–27.Google Scholar
  8. AustinM. P., GrovesR. H., FrescoL. F. M. & KayeP. E. 1985. Relative growth of six thistle species along a nutrient gradient with multispecies competition. J. Ecol. 73: 667–684.Google Scholar
  9. BrownJ. H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124: 255–279.Google Scholar
  10. DaubenmireR. 1966. Vegetation: identification of typal communities. Science 151: 291–298.Google Scholar
  11. Dimmock, G. M. 1961. Reconnaissance soil map of Tasmania: sheet 74 Ellendale. CSIRO Division of Soils, divisional report 5/61.Google Scholar
  12. EllenbergH. 1954. Über einige Fortschritte der kausalen Vegetationskunde. Vegetatio 5/6: 199–211.Google Scholar
  13. FaithD. P., MinchinP. R. & BelbinL. 1987. Compositional dissimilarity as a robust measure of ecological distance. Vegetatio 69: 57–68.Google Scholar
  14. GauchH. G. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  15. GauchH. G. & WhittakerR. H. 1972. Coenocline simulation. Ecology 53: 446–451.Google Scholar
  16. GauchH. G. & WhittakerR. H. 1976. Simulation of community patterns. Vegetatio 33: 13–16.Google Scholar
  17. GleasonH. A. 1939. The individualistic concept of the plant association. Am. Midl. Nat. 21: 92–110.Google Scholar
  18. GoodallD. W. 1963. The continuum and the individualistic association. Vegetatio 11: 297–316.Google Scholar
  19. Greig-SmithP. 1980. The development of numerical classification and ordination. Vegetatio 42: 1–9.Google Scholar
  20. GrimeJ. P. 1973. Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation. J. Environ. Manage. 1: 151–167.Google Scholar
  21. HillM. O. & GauchH. G. 1980. Detrended correspondence analysis, an improved ordination technique. Vegetatio 42: 47–58.Google Scholar
  22. Jones. R. 1969. Fire-stick farming. Aust. Nat. Hist. September 1969: 224–228.Google Scholar
  23. KeddyP. A. 1983. Shoreline vegetation in Axe Lake, Ontario: effects of exposure on zonation patterns. Ecology 64: 331–344.Google Scholar
  24. McIntoshR. P. 1967. The continuum concept of vegetation. Bot. Rev. 33: 130–187.Google Scholar
  25. Minchin, P. R. 1983. A comparative evaluation of techniques for ecological ordination using simulated vegetation data and an integrated ordination-classification analysis of the alpine and subalpine plant communities of the Mt. Field plateau, Tasmania, Ph.D. thesis, University of Tasmania.Google Scholar
  26. MinchinP. R. 1987a. An evaluation of the relative robustness of techniques for ecological ordination. Vegetatio 69: 89–107.Google Scholar
  27. MinchinP. R. 1987b. Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Vegetatio 71: 145–156.Google Scholar
  28. OgdenJ. & PowellJ. A. 1979. A quantitative description of the forest vegetation on an altitudinal gradient in the Mount Field National Park, Tasmania, and a discussion of its history and dynamics. Aust. J. Ecol. 4: 293–325.Google Scholar
  29. PeetR. K. 1978. Forest vegetation of the Colorado Front Range: patterns of species diversity. Vegetatio 37: 65–78.Google Scholar
  30. PielouE. C. 1977. Mathematical ecology. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  31. SampsonR. J. 1978. Surface II graphics system (revision 1). Kansas Geological Survey, Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
  32. ShipleyB. & KeddyP. A. 1987. The individualistic and community-unit concepts as falsifiable hypotheses. Vegetatio 69: 47–55.Google Scholar
  33. SokalR. R. & RohlfF. J. 1969. Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  34. ter BraakC. J. F. 1985. Correspondence analysis of incidence and abundance data: properties in terms of a unimodal response model. Biometrics 41: 859–873.Google Scholar
  35. UnderwoodA. J. 1978. The detection of non-random patterns of distribution of species along a gradient. Oecologia 36: 317–326.Google Scholar
  36. WergerM. J. A., LouppenJ. M. W. & EppinkJ. H. M. 1983. Species performance and vegetation boundaries along an environmental gradient. Vegetatio 52: 141–150.Google Scholar
  37. WestmanW. E. 1980. Gaussian analysis: identifying environmental factors influencing bell-shaped species distributions. Ecology 61: 733–739.Google Scholar
  38. WhittakerR. H. 1951. A criticism of the plant association and climatic climax concepts. Northwest Sci. 25: 17–31.Google Scholar
  39. WhittakerR. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecol. Monogr. 26: 1–80.Google Scholar
  40. WhittakerR. H. 1960. Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol. Monogr. 30: 279–338.Google Scholar
  41. WhittakerR. H. 1967. Gradient analysis of vegetation. Biol. Rev. 42: 207–264.Google Scholar
  42. WhittakerR. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems. 2nd ed. MacMillan, New York.Google Scholar
  43. WhittakerR. H. & GauchH. G. 1978. Evaluation of ordination techniques. In: WhittakerR. H. (ed.), Ordination of plant communities, pp. 227–336. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  44. WilsonM. V. & MohlerC. L. 1983. Measuring compositional change along gradients. Vegetatio 54: 129–141.Google Scholar
  45. ØklandR. H. 1986a. Rescaling of ecological gradients. I. Calculation of ecological distance between vegetation stands by means of their floristic composition. Nord. J. Bot. 6: 651–660.Google Scholar
  46. ØklandR. H. 1986b. Rescaling of ecological gradients. II. The effect of scale on symmetry of species response curves. Nord. J. Bot. 6: 661–669.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter R. Minchin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biogeography and Geomorphology, Research School of Pacific StudiesAustralian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations