Advertisement

Vegetatio

, Volume 83, Issue 1–2, pp 71–80 | Cite as

Fuzzy systems vegetation theory

  • David W. Roberts
Article

Abstract

Fuzzy systems vegetation theory is a comprehensive framework for the expression of vegetation theory and conceptual models, as well as the development of vegetation analyses. It is applicable to vegetation/environment relations, vegetation dynamics, and the effects of environmental dynamics on vegetation composition. Fuzzy systems vegetation theory is a fuzzy set generalization of dynamical systems theory and incorporates a formal logic and mathematics. This paper presents the elements of fuzzy systems vegetation theory and discusses the relationship of the fuzzy systems theory to the geometric concepts generally employed in vegetation theory.

Keywords

Environment/vegetation relations Fuzzy set Succession Vegetation dynamics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AllenT. F. H. & StarrT. B., 1982. Hierarchy: Perspectives for ecological complexity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. CaswellH. H., 1988. Theory and models in ecology: A different perspective. Ecol. Model 43: 33–44.Google Scholar
  3. DaubenmireR., 1966. Vegetation: Identification of typal communities. Science 151: 291–298.Google Scholar
  4. DuboisD. & PradeH. 1980. Fuzzy sets and systems: Theory and applications. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. FeoliE. & ZuccarelloV. 1986. Ordination based on classification: Yet another solution?! Abstr. Bot. 10: 203–219.Google Scholar
  6. FeoliE. & ZuccarelloV. 1988. Syntaxonomy: A source of useful fuzzy sets of environmental analysis? Coenoses 3: 141–147.Google Scholar
  7. HuschleG. & HironakaM. 1980. Classification and ordination of seral plant communities. J. Range Manage. 33: 179–182.Google Scholar
  8. JongmanR. H., terBraakC. J. F. & vanTongerenO. F. R. 1987. Data analysis in community and landscape ecology. Pudoc, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  9. McIntoshR. P. 1967. The continuum concept of vegetation. Bot. Rev. 33: 130–187.Google Scholar
  10. PastorJ. & PostW. M. 1984. Calculating Thornthwaite and Mather's actual evapotranspiration using an approximating function. Can. J. For. Res. 14: 466–467.Google Scholar
  11. RobertsD. W. 1986. Ordination on the basis of fuzzy set theory. Vegetatio 66: 123–131.Google Scholar
  12. RobertsD. W. 1987. A dynamical systems perspective on vegetation theory. Vegetatio 69: 27–33.Google Scholar
  13. SteeleR. 1984. An approach to classifying seral vegetation within habitat types. Northwest Sci. 58: 29–39.Google Scholar
  14. terBraakC. J. F. & PrenticeI. C. 1987. A theory of gradient analysis. Adv. Ecol. Res. 18: 271–317.Google Scholar
  15. ThornthwaiteC. W. & MatherJ. R. 1957. Instructions and tables for computing potential evapotranspiration and the water balance. Publ. Climatol. 10: 183–311.Google Scholar
  16. vanLeeuwenC. G. 1966. A relation theoretical approach to pattern and process in vegetation. Wentia 15: 25–46.Google Scholar
  17. WhittakerR. H. 1953. A consideration of climax theory: The climax as a population and pattern. Ecol. Monogr. 23: 41–78.Google Scholar
  18. WhittakerR. H. 1974. Climax concepts and recognition. In: KnappR. (ed.), Vegetation dynamics, pp. 137–154. Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • David W. Roberts
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Forest Resources and Ecology CenterUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations