Triplet-minus-singlet absorbance difference spectra of reaction centers of Rhodopseudomonas sphaeroides R-26 in the temperature range 24–290 K measured by Magneto-Optical Difference Spectroscopy (MODS)
A rapid decrease of positive absorption bands at 809 and 819 nm.
A slow appearance of a band shift at 798 nm.
A shift of the peak wavelength of the Qy absorbance band of the primary donor P-860 from 992 to 861 nm, and of its Qx band from 603 to 600 nm.
The spectra at 24, 66, 116, and 290 K have been analyzed by Gaussian deconvolution. The 800 nm region of the spectrum at 24 K can be decomposed in a combination of two band shifts and an appearing band. The temperature dependence of the spectra in this region is well explained by spectral broadening of the two shifting bands combined with a decrease in intensity of the appearing band when the temperature increases.
The two shifting bands in the 800 nm region are identified as the two bands at 803 and 813 nm which together make up the 800 nm band in the absorption spectrum and are assigned to the two accessory RC bacteriochlorophylls (BChls). The band shift of the 813 nm pigment is appreciably larger than that of the 803 nm pigment. The appearing band at 808 nm is attributed to monomeric absorption of 3P-860, the triplet state being localized on one BChl.
We find no evidence for admixture of a charge transfer (CT) state of 3P-860 with one of the accessory BChls at higher temperature.
Key wordsbacterial photosynthesis reaction center triplet state MOS (Rps. sphaeroides R-26)
absorption detected magnetic resonance
accessory BChl molecule
full width at half maximum
magneto-optical difference spectroscopy
primary quinone acceptor
Rps sphaeroides, mutant R-26
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Clayton RK and Yamamoto T (1976) Photochem Photobiol 24:67–70Google Scholar
- 2.Deisenhofer J, Epp K, Miki O, Huber R and Michel H (1984) J Mol Biol 180: 385–395Google Scholar
- 3.Den Blanken HJ and Hoff AJ (1982) Biochim Biophys Acta 681:365–374Google Scholar
- 4.Den Blanken HJ and Hoff AJ (1983) Chem Phys Lett 98:255–262Google Scholar
- 5.Den Blanken HJ, Meiburg RF and Hoff AJ (1984) Chem Phys Lett 105:336–342Google Scholar
- 6.Feher G (1971) Photochem Photobiol 14:373–387Google Scholar
- 7.Feher G and Okamura MY (1978) In Clayton RK and Sistrom WR, eds. The Photosynthetic Bacteria, pp 349–386. New York: Plenum PressGoogle Scholar
- 8.Hoff AJ and Proskuryakov II (1985) Chem Phys Lett 115:303–310Google Scholar
- 9.Hoff AJ, den Blanken HJ, Vasmel H and Meiburg RF (1985) Biochim Biophys Acta 806:389–397Google Scholar
- 10.Hoff AJ, Lous EJ, Moehl KW and Dijkman JA (1985) Chem Phys Lett 114:39–43Google Scholar
- 11.Marquardt DW (1963) J Soc Indust Appl Math 7:431–441Google Scholar
- 12.Martin J-L, Breton J, Hoff AJ, Migus A and Antonetti A (1985) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, in the pressGoogle Scholar
- 13.Meech SR, Hoff AJ and Wiersma DA (1985) Chem Phys Lett, in the pressGoogle Scholar
- 14.Pekkarinen L and Linschitz H (1960) J Am Chem Soc 82:2407–2411Google Scholar
- 15.Shuvalov VA and Parson WW (1981) Biochim Biophys Acta 638:50–59Google Scholar
- 16.Shuvalov VA and Parson WW (1981) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 78:957–961Google Scholar
- 17.Zinth W, Knapp EW, Fischer SF, Kaiser W, Deisenhofer J and Michel H (1985) Chem Phys Lett 119:1–4Google Scholar