Plant and Soil

, Volume 168, Issue 1, pp 593–600

Mechanisms of carbon and nutrient release and retention in beech forest gaps

III. Environmental regulation of soil respiration and nitrous oxide emissions along a microclimatic gradient
  • Rainer Brumme
The Implication of Climate Change on Forest Research


Fluxes of CO2 and N2O were measured along a microclimatic gradient stretching from the centre of a gap into a mature beech stand using an automated chamber method. Simultaneously the regulating factors like soil water tensions, soil temperatures, nitrate concentrations were measured along the gradient. The daily mean values of the fluxes of CO2 and N2O were divided into classes of temperature and furthermore subdivided into classes of soil water tension to assess the significance of each regulating factor.

Soil respiration at the centre of the gap was 40% lower compared to the rooted mature stand. The difference was explained by root respiration. At both sites soil respiration was primarily controlled by the soil temperature with an average Q10 value of 2.3 over the different classes of temperature and soil water tension. Soil water tension reduced the soil respiration by up to 20% only by soil water tension above 400–600 hPa at the mature stand. The formation of N2O was reduced when the soil temperature was below 10°C or the soil water tension exceeded 200 hPa. Therefore the N2O emission was 6 times higher at the unrooted centre of the gap due to the high moisture content in the growing season. Higher nitrate concentration doubled the N2O emission at the unrooted edge of the canopy and resulted in losses of 6.4 kg N ha-1 within six months. Above 10°C and below 200 hPa the N2O emission depended strongly upon the temperature with varying Q10 values over the different classes of temperature and soil water tension. High Q10 values up to 14.4 have been calculated below 14°C and were explained by several processes with synergetic effects.

Key words

CO2 emission gaps N2O emission Q10 values root respiration temperate beech forest 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Anderson J M 1992 Responses of soils to climate change. In The Ecological Consequences of Global Climate Change. Ed. F I Woodward. pp 63–210. Advances in Ecological research, Vol. 22. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  2. Andreae M O and Schimel D S 1989 Exchange of Trace Gases between Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. 347 p.Google Scholar
  3. Aulakh M S, Doran J W and Mosier A R 1992 Soil denitrification-Significance, measurement and effects of management. In Advances in Soil Science. Ed. B A Stewart. Vol. 18, pp 2–57. Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey L D 1976 Effects of temperature and root on denitrification in a soil. Can. J. Soil. Sci. 56, 79–87.Google Scholar
  5. Bauhus J and Bartsch N 1995 Mechanisms for carbon and nutrient release and retention in beech forest gaps. I. Microclimate, water balance and seepage water chemistry. Plant and Soil 168/169.Google Scholar
  6. Bauhus J and Barthel R 1995 Mechanisms of carbon and nutrient release and retention in beech forest gaps.II The role of soil microbial biomass. Plant and Soil 168/169.Google Scholar
  7. Bouwman A F 1990 Soil and the Greenhouse effect. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester. 575 p.Google Scholar
  8. Bouwman A F, Fung I, Matthews E and John J 1993 Global analysis of the potential for N2O production in natural soils. Global Biog. eochem. Cycles 7, 557–597.Google Scholar
  9. Brumme R and Beese F 1992 Effects of liming and nitrogen fertilization on emissions of CO2 and N2O from a temporate forest. J. Geophys. Res. 97, 12, 851–858.Google Scholar
  10. Brumme R and Beese F 1994 Automated monitoring of biological trace gas production and consumption. In Methods in Applied Soil Microbiology and biochemistry. Eds. KAlef and PNannipieri. Academic Press Limited. London. (In press).Google Scholar
  11. Crutzen 1974 Estimates of possible variation in total ozone due to natural causes and human activity. Ambio 3, 201–210.Google Scholar
  12. Denmead O T, Freney J R and Simpson J R 1979 Studies of nitrous oxide emission from a grass sward. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 43, 726–728.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards N T 1975 Effects of temperature and moisture on carbon dioxide evolution in a mixed dicidous forest floor. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 39, 361–365.Google Scholar
  14. Firestone M K and Davidson E A 1989 Microbiological basis of NO and N2O production and consumption in soil. In Exchange of Trace Gases between Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere. Eds. M OAndreae and D SSchimmel. Dahlem Workshop Reports 47, pp 7–21. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  15. Flühler J 1973 Sauerstoffdiffusion im Boden. Ed. W Bosshard. Direktor der Eidgenössischen Anstant für das Forstliche Versuchswesen 49.Google Scholar
  16. Focht D D 1974 The effect of temperature, pH, and aeration on the production of nitrous oxide and gaseous nitrogen—A zero-order kinetic model. Soil Science 118, 173–179.Google Scholar
  17. Focht D D and Verstraete W 1977 Biochemical ecology of nitrifcation and denitrification. Adv. Microbial Ecol. 1, 135–214.Google Scholar
  18. Freney J R, Denmead O T and Simpson J R 1979 Nitrous oxide emission from soils at low moisture contents. Soil. Biol. Biochem. 14, 167–173.Google Scholar
  19. Lashof D A and Ahuja D R 1990 Relative contribution of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344, 529–531.Google Scholar
  20. Luizao F, matson P, Livingston G, Luizao R and Vitousek P 1989 Nitrous oxide flux following tropical land clearing. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 3, 281–285.Google Scholar
  21. McKenney D J, Shuttleworth K F and Findlay W I 1980 Temperature dependence of nitrous oxide production from brookston clay. Can. J. Soil Sci. 60, 665–674.Google Scholar
  22. Meiwes K J, Khana P K, Prenzel J and Ulrich B 1984 Chemische Untersuchungsverfahren für Mineralboden, Auflagehumus und Wurzeln zur Charakterisierung und Bewertung der Versauerung in Waldböden. Ber. Forschungsz. Waldökosysteme/Waldsterben 7, 1–67.Google Scholar
  23. Mosier A R, Parton W J and Hutchinson G L 1983 Modelling nitrous oxide evolution from cropped and native soils. In Environmental Biogeochemistry Ecol. Bull. 35, pp 22–241. Ed. R Hallerg. Stockholm.Google Scholar
  24. Nommik H 1956 Investigation on denitrification in soil. Acta Agric. Scand. Vol. 6, 198–228.Google Scholar
  25. Nommik H and Larsson K 1989 Measurement of denitrification rate in undisturbed soil cores under different temperature and moisture conditions using 15N tracer technique. Swed. J. Agric. Res. 19, 29–34.Google Scholar
  26. Raich J W and Nadelhoffer K J 1989 Belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems: global trends. Ecology 70, 1346–1354.Google Scholar
  27. Raich J W and Schlesinger W H 1992 The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus 44, 81–99.Google Scholar
  28. Robertson G P, Vitousek P M, Matson P A and Tiedje J M 1987 Denitrification in a clearcut Loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) plantation in the southeastern US. Plant and Soil 97, 119–129.Google Scholar
  29. Robertson G P 1989 Nitrification and denitrification in humid tropical ecosystems: potential controls on nitrogen retention. In Mineral Nutrients in Tropical Forest and Savanna Ecosystems. Ed. JProctor. pp 55–69. Blackwell Scientific Publications, London.Google Scholar
  30. Schlesinger W H 1977 Carbon balance in terrestrial detritus. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 8, 51–81.Google Scholar
  31. Singh J S and Gupta S R 1977 Plant decomposition and soil respiration in terrestrial ecosystems. Bot. Rev. 43, 449–528.Google Scholar
  32. Stanford G, Dzienea S and Pol R A V 1975 Effect of temperature on denitrification rate in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 39, 867–870.Google Scholar
  33. Vitousek P M 1981 Clear-cutting and the nitrogen cycle. In Terrestrial nitrogen cycles. Eds. F E Clark and T Rosswall. Ecol. Bull. Stockholm, 33, 631–642.Google Scholar
  34. Weier K L, Doran J W, Power J W and Walters D T 1993 Denitrification and the denitrogen/nitrous oxide ratio as affected by soil water, available carbon, and nitrate. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 66–72.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rainer Brumme
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Ecosystem Research CentreUniversity of Göttingen, Institute of Soil Science and Forest NutritionGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations