Hydrobiologia

, Volume 53, Issue 2, pp 139–146

Some aspects of the feeding biology of benthic herbivores

  • J. W. Moore
Article

Summary

The methods used in collection, preservation, and gut content and grazing analysis of benthic herbivores are reviewed. In addition, the results of experiments conducted on feeding periodicities and on the suitability for feeding studies of animals which were 1) collected with an electric shocker, 2) collected from the downstream drift of rivers and 3) killed with certain preservatives are presented. It is concluded that since most methods involve such a high degree of error, many of our concepts regarding the nutritional importance of different foods, selective feeding and the magnitude of herbivorous grazing may be largely misleading.

Keywords

benthos feeding methods algae grazing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brinkhurst, R. O. & Chau, K. E. 1969. Preliminary investigation of the exploitation of some potential nutritional resources by three sympatric tubificid oligochaetes. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 2659–2668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, D. S. 1961. The food of larvae of Chloeon dipterum L. and Baetis rhodani (Pictet) (Insecta, Ephemeroptera). J. Anim. Ecol. 30: 55–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Calow, P. 1975a. The feeding strategies of two freshwater gastropods, Ancylus fluviatilis Müll. and Planorbis contortus Linn. (Pulmonata), in terms of ingestion rates and absorption efficiencies. Oecologia, 20: 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calow, P. 1975b. On the nature and possible utility of epilithic detritus. Hydrobiologia, 46: 181–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cummins, K. W. 1973. Trophic relations of aquatic insects. Ann Rev. Ent. 18: 183–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Edmondson, W. T. 1959. Rotifera. In: Freshwater Biology (ed. by W. T. Edmondson) pp. 420–494. John Wiley & Sons. New York.Google Scholar
  7. Edmondson, W. T. 1965. Reproductive rate of planktonic rotifers as related to food and temperature in nature. Ecol. Monogr. 35: 61–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmondson, W. T. 1971. Properties of organisms. In: Secondary productivity in freshwaters (ed. by W. T. Edmondson & G. G. Winberg) pp. 140–149. Blackwell Sci. Publ. Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Edmondson, W. T. & Winberg, G. G. 1971. Preservation. In: Secondary productivity in fresh waters (ed. by W. T. Edmondson & G. G. Winberg) pp. 124–125. Blackwell Sci. Publ. Oxford. 358 p.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott, J. M. 1971a. The distances travelled by drifting invertebrates in a Lake District stream. Oecologia, 6: 350–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elliott, J. M. 1971b. Upstream movements of benthic invertebrates in a Lake District stream. J. Anim. Ecol. 40: 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fischer, Z. & Lawton, J. K. 1971. Predators. In: Secondary productivity in fresh waters (ed. by W. T. Edmondson & G. G. Winberg) pp. 256–261. Blackwell Sci. Publ. Oxford. 358 p.Google Scholar
  13. Fredeen, F. J. H. 1960. Bacteria as a source of food for blackfly larvae. Nature, Lond. 187: 963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fredeen, F. J. H. 1964. Bacteria as a source of food for blackfly larvae (Diptera: Similiidae) in laboratory cultures and in natural streams. Can. J. Zool. 42: 527–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gerson, U. 1974. The associations of algae with arthropods. Rev. Algol. 11: 18–42.Google Scholar
  16. Goulder, R. 1973. Observations over 24 hours on the quantity of algae inside grazing ciliated Protozoa. Oecologia, 13: 177–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hall, H. A. & Pritchard, G. 1975. The food of larvae of Tipula sacra Alexander in a series of abandoned beaver ponds (Diptera: Tipulidae). J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hargrave, B. T. 1970. The utilization of benthic microflora by Hyallela azteca (Amphipoda). J. Anim. Ecol. 39: 427–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hultin, L. 1968. A method of trapping freshwater Amphipoda migrating upstream. Oikos, 19: 400–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hustedt, F. 1930. Bacillariophyta. In: Die Susswasser-Flora Mittleuropas (ed. by A. Pacher). G. Fischer. Jena.Google Scholar
  21. Hustedt, F. 1961. 1966. Die Kiesslalgen Deutschlands, Osterreichs, und der Schweiz. In: Kryptogamen-Flora (ed. by L. Rabenhorst) Johnson Reprint Corp. New York.Google Scholar
  22. Hynes, H. B. N. 1954. The ecology of Gammarus duebeni Lilljeborg and its occurence in freshwater in western Britain. J. Anim. Ecol. 23: 38–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaushik, N. K. & Hynes, H. B. N. 1971. The fate of dead leaves that fall into streams. Arch. Hydrobiol. 68: 465–515.Google Scholar
  24. Ivlev, V. S. 1945. The biological productivity of waters. (In Russian). Trans. by W. E. Ricker, 1966. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 23: 1727–1759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lund, J. W. G. 1964. Primary production and periodicity of phytoplankton. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 15: 37–56.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, A. L. 1966. Feeding and digestion of two intertidal gammarids: Marinogammarus obtusatus and M. pirloti. J. Zool. 148: 515–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mills, D. H. & Wyatt, J. T. 1974. Ostracod reactions to non-toxic and toxic algae. Oecologia, 17: 171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Moon, H. P. 1938. The growth of Coenis horaria (L.), Leptophlebia vespertina (L.) and L. marginata (L.) (Ephemeroptera). Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond. 108: 507–512.Google Scholar
  29. Moore, J. W. 1972. Composition and structure of algal communities in a tributary stream of Lake Ontario. Can J. Bot. 50: 1663–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moore, J. W. 1975a. The role of algae in the diet of Asellus aquaticus L. and Gammarus pulex L. J. Anim. Ecol. 44: 719–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moore, J. W. 1975b. Seasonal changes in the proximate and fatty acid composition of some naturally grown freshwater chlorophytes. J. Phycol. 11: 205–211.Google Scholar
  32. Moore, J. W. & Beamish, F. W. H. 1973. Food of larval sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) and American brook lamprey (Lampetra lamottei). J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 30: 7–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moore, J. W. & Potter, 1. C. I 976a. Aspects of feeding and lipid deposition and utilization in the lampreys Lampetra fluviatilis (L.) and Lampetra planeri (Bloch). J. Anim. Ecol. (In press).Google Scholar
  34. Moore, J. W. & Potter, I. C. 1976b. A laboratory study on the feeding of the brook lamprey Lampetra planeri (Bloch). J. Anim, Ecol. (45: 81–90).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moriarity, D. J. W. 1975. A method for estimating the biomass of bacteria in aquatic sediments and its application to trophic studies. Oecologia, 20: 219–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mullin, M. M., Sloan, P. R. & Eppley, R. W. 1966. Relationship between carbon content, cell volume, and area in phytoplankton. Limnol, Oceanogr. 11: 307–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nalewajko, C. 1966. Dry weight, ash, and volume data for some freshwater planktonic algae. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 23: 1285–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Potter, I. C., Cannon, D. & Moore, J. W. 1975. The ecology of algae in the Moruya River, Australia. Hydrobiologia (47: 415–430).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rigler, F. H. 1971. Zooplankton. In: Secondary productivity in fresh waters (ed. by W. T. Edmondson & G. G. Winberg) pp. 228–254. Blackwell Sci. Publ. Oxford. 358 p.Google Scholar
  40. Spoehr, H. A. & Milner, H. W. 1949. The chemical composition of Chlorella: effect of environmental conditions. Plant Physiol. 24: 120–149.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Steedman, H. F. 1974. Laboratory methods in the study of marine zooplankton. J. Cons. int. Explor. Mer, 35: 351–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Waters, T. F. 1965. Interpretation of invertebrate drift in streams. Ecology, 46: 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b. v. Publishers 1977

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental Protection ServiceYellowknifeCanada

Personalised recommendations