Euphytica

, Volume 88, Issue 1, pp 35–45 | Cite as

Heat tolerance in food legumes as evaluated by cell membrane thermostability and chlorophyll fluorescence techniques

  • Ancha Srinivasan
  • Hiroyuki Takeda
  • Toshihiro Senboku
Article

Summary

The genotypic variation for heat tolerance in chickpea, groundnut, pigeonpea, and soya bean was evaluated by testing membrane stability and photosystem (PSII) function in leaves at high temperatures. The legumes could be ranked from heat-tolerant to sensitive in the order: groundnut, soya bean, pigeonpea and chickpea. The damage to cell membranes (as reflected by an increased leakage of electrolytes) and PS II (as reflected by a decrease in the ratio of variable to maximum fluorescence) was less, and recovery from heat stress was faster in groundnut than in other crops. Prior exposure of plants to 35°C for 24h led to a reduced leakage of electrolytes at high temperatures in all crops but the differences among legumes were consistent. Substantial genotypic variation for heat tolerance was found in all legumes. Membrane injury was negatively associated with specific leaf weight in groundnut (r=−0.69**) and soya bean (r=−0.56**) but not in the pulses. Electrolyte leakage and fluorescence ratio were negatively correlated in all legumes. The potential use of electrolyte leakage and fluorescence tests as screening procedures for breeding heat-tolerant legumes is discussed.

Key words

Chickpea chlorophyll fluorescence groundnut heat tolerance membrane stability photosystem pigeonpea screening methods soya bean thermostability Cicer arietinum Glycine max Arachis hypogaea Cajanus cajan 

Abbreviations

RI

relative injury

Fo

initial fluorescence

Fm

maximum fluorescence

Fv

variable fluorescence

PS II

photosystem II

PAR

photosynthetically active radiation

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexandrov, V.Y., 1964. Cytophysiological and cytoecological investigations of heat resistance of plant cells toward the action of high and low temperature. Quart. Rev. Biol. 39: 35–77.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, N.R., M. Bradbury, P.K. Farage, C.R. Ireland & S.P. Long, 1989. Measurements of quantum yield of carbon assimilation and chlorophyll fluorescence for assessment of photosynthetic performance of crops in the field. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B. 323: 295–308.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-Tsur, A., J. Rudich & B. Barvdo, 1985. High temperature effects on CO2 gas exchange in heat tolerant and sensitive tomatoes. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 110: 582–586.Google Scholar
  4. Bernstam, V.A., 1978. Heat effects on protein biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 29: 25–46.Google Scholar
  5. Blum, A., 1988. Plant breeding for stress environments. CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, D.M., 1960. Soya bean ecology. I. Development temperature relationships from controlled environment studies. Agron. J. 52: 493–496.Google Scholar
  7. Demmig, B. & O. Bjorkman, 1987. Comparison of the effect of excessive light on chlorophyll fluorescence (77K) and photon yield of O2 evolution of leaves of higher plants. Planta 171: 171–184.Google Scholar
  8. Demmig, B., K. Winter, A. Kruger & F.C. Czygan, 1987. Photoinhibition and zeaxanthin formation in intact leaves. A possible role of the xanthophyll cycle in the dissipation of excess light energy. Plant Physiol. 84: 218–224.Google Scholar
  9. Hall, A.E., 1992. Breeding for heat tolerance. Plant Breeding Rev. 10: 129–168.Google Scholar
  10. IRRI, 1992. IRRISTAT User's Manual. Biometrics Unit, International Rice Research Institute, Manila, Philippines, 122 pp.Google Scholar
  11. Jarvis, M.C., W. Forsyth & H.J. Duncan, 1988. A survey of the pectin content of nonlignified monocot cell walls. Plant Physiol. 88: 309–314.Google Scholar
  12. Ketring, D.L., 1984. Temperature effects on vegetative and reproductive development of peanut. Crop Sci. 24: 877–882.Google Scholar
  13. Krause, G.H. & E. Weiss, 1984. Chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool in plant physiology. II. Interpretation of fluorescence signals. Photosyn. Res. 5: 139–157.Google Scholar
  14. Kuo, C.G., H.M. Chen & H.C. Sun, 1993. Membrane thermostability and heat tolerance of vegetable leaves. In: C.G. Kuo (Ed.). Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress. Asian Vegetable Research and Development Center, Shanhua, Taiwan. pp. 160–168.Google Scholar
  15. Levitt, J., 1980. Responses of plants to environmental stresses. Vol. I. Chilling, freezing and high temperature stresses. Academic Press, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  16. Lin, C.Y., Y.M. Chen & J.L. Key, 1985. Solute leakage in soya bean seedlings under various heat shock regimes. Plant Cell Physiol. 26: 1493–1498.Google Scholar
  17. MacRae, E.A., A.K. Hardacre & I.B. Ferguson, 1986. Comparison of chlorophyll fluorescence with several other techniques used to assess chilling sensitivity in plants. Physiol. Plant. 67: 659–665.Google Scholar
  18. Malhotra, R.S. & M.C. Saxena, 1993. Screening for cold and heat tolerance in cool-season food legumes. In: K.B. Singh & M.C. Saxena (Eds). Breeding for stress tolerance in cool season food legumes. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK. pp. 227–244.Google Scholar
  19. Martineau, J.R., J.E. Specht, J.H. Williams & C.Y. Sullivan, 1979. Temperature tolerance in soybeans. I. Evaluation of a technique for assessing cellular membrane thermostability. Crop Sci. 19: 75–78.Google Scholar
  20. Moffat, J.M., R.G. Sears & G.M. Paulsen, 1990. Wheat high temperature tolerance during reproductive growth. II. Genetic analysis of chlorophyll fluorescence. Crop Sci. 30: 886–889.Google Scholar
  21. Potvin, C., 1985. Effect of leaf detachment on chlorophyll fluorescence during chilling experiments. Plant Physiol. 78: 883–886.Google Scholar
  22. Quinn, P.J., 1989. Membrane stability under thermal stress. In: P.A. Biacs, K. Gruiz & K. Kremmer (Eds). Biological role of lipids. Plenum Publ. New York, USA, pp. 511–515.Google Scholar
  23. Sandalla, M.M., J.F. Shanahan & J.S. Quick, 1990. Heat tolerance in winter wheat. I. Hardening and genetic effects on membrane thermostability. Crop Sci. 30: 1243–1247.Google Scholar
  24. Sapca, V.T. & A.O. Anaele, 1991. Screening soybean genotypes for drought and heat tolerance. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 167: 96–102.Google Scholar
  25. Schaff, D.A., C.D. Clayberg & G.A. Williken, 1987. Comparison of TTC and electrical conductivity heat tolerance screening techniques in Phaseolus. Hort Sci. 22: 642–645.Google Scholar
  26. Schneider, S.H., 1989. The changing climate. Sci. Am. 261 (3): 70–79.Google Scholar
  27. Shen, Z.Y. & P.H. Li, 1982. Heat adaptability of the tomato. Hort Sci. 17: 924–925.Google Scholar
  28. Smillie, R.M. & S.E. Hetherington, 1990. Screening for stress tolerance by chlorophyll fluorescence. In: Y. Hashimoto, P.J. Kramer, H. Nonami & B.R. Strain (Eds). Measurementtechniques in plant science. Academic Press, San Diego, USA, pp. 229–261.Google Scholar
  29. Smillie, R.M., S.E. Hetherington, J. He & R. Nott, 1988. Photoinhibition at chilling temperatures. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 15: 207–222.Google Scholar
  30. Smillie, R.M., R. Nott, S.E. Hetherington & G. Oquist, 1987. Chilling injury and recovery in detached and attached leaves measured by chlorophyll fluorescence. Physiol. Plant. 69: 419–428.Google Scholar
  31. Somersalo, S. & G.H. Krause, 1989. Photoinhibition at chilling temperature: Fluorescence characteristics of unhardened and coldacclimated spinach leaves. Plant 177: 409–416.Google Scholar
  32. Summerfield, R.J., P. Hadley, E.H. Roberts, F.R. Minchin & S. Rawthorne, 1984. Sensitivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) to hot temperatures during the reproductive period. Exptl. Agric. 20: 77–93.Google Scholar
  33. Sundby, C., A. Melis, P. Maenpaa & B. Anderson, 1986. Temperature-dependent changes in the antenna size of photosystem II. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 851: 475–483.Google Scholar
  34. Suss, K.H. & I.T. Yodanov, 1986. Biosynthetic cause of in vivo acquired thermotolerance of photosynthetic light reactions and metabolic respones of chloroplasts to heat stress. Plant Physiol. 81: 192–199.Google Scholar
  35. Sutter, E. & R.W. Langhans, 1982. Formation of epicutilar wax and its effect on water loss in clbbage plants regenrated from shoot-tip culture. Can. J. Bot. 60: 2896–2902.Google Scholar
  36. Tal, M. & M.C. Shannon, 1983. Effects of dehydration and high temperatire on the stability of lef membrances of Lycopersicon esculentum, L. peruvianum and solanum penellii. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 112: 411–416.Google Scholar
  37. Weiss, E. & J.A. Berry, 1988. Plant and High Temperatire Stress. society for Experimental Biology, UK.Google Scholar
  38. Wery, J., S.N. Silim, E.J. Knights, R.S. Malhotra & R. Cousin, 1994. Screening techniques and sources of tolerance to extremes of moistire and air temperature in cool season food legumes. Euphytica 73: 73–83.Google Scholar
  39. Wilson, J.M. & J.A. Greaves, 1990. Assessment of chilling unjury by chlorophyll fluorescence analysis. In: C.Y. Wang (Ed). Chilling injury to horticultural crops. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, pp. 129–141.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ancha Srinivasan
    • 1
  • Hiroyuki Takeda
    • 1
  • Toshihiro Senboku
    • 1
  1. 1.Japan International Research Center for Agricultural Sciences (JIRCAS), Okinawa Subtropical StationInternational Collaboration Research SectionIshigaki, OkinawaJapan

Personalised recommendations