Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 22, Issue 6, pp 1017–1029 | Cite as

Molecular characterization of four chitinase cDNAs obtained fromCladosporium fulvum-infected tomato

  • Nadia Danhash
  • Cornelia A. M. Wagemakers
  • Jan A. L. van Kan
  • Pierre J. G. M. de Wit
Research Articles


Complementary DNA clones encoding acidic and basic isoforms of tomato chitinases were isolated fromCladosporium fulvum-infected leaves. The clones were sequenced and found to encode the 30 kDa basic intracellular and the 26 and 27 kDa acidic extracellular tomato chitinases previously purified (M.H.A.J. Joostenet al., in preparation). A fourth truncated cDNA which appears to encode an extracellular chitinase with 82% amino acid similarity to the 30 kDa intracellular chitinase was also isolated. Characterization of the clones revealed that the 30 kDa basic intracellular protein is a class I chitinase and that the 26 and 27 kDa acidic extracellular proteins which have 85% peptide sequence similarity are class II chitinases. The characterized cDNA clones represent four from a family of at least six tomato chitinases. Southern blot analysis indicated that, with the exception of the 30 kDa basic intracellular chitinase, the tomato chitinases are encoded by one or two genes. Northern blot analysis showed that the mRNA encoding the 26 kDa acidic extracellular chitinase is induced more rapidly during an incompatibleC. fulvum-tomato interaction than during a compatible interaction. This difference in timing of mRNA induction was not observed for the 30 kDa basic intracellular chitinase.

Key words

chitinase gene expression pathogenesis-related protein plant-fungus interaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barber MS, Bertram RE, Ride JP: Chitin oligosaccharides elicit lignification in wounded wheat leaves. Physiol Mol Plant path 34: 3–12 (1989).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bednarek SY, Raikhel NV: The barley lectin carboxyl-terminal propeptide is a vacuolar protein sorting determinant in plants. Plant Cell 3: 1195–1206 (1991).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benhamou N, Joosten MHAJ, de Wit PJGM: Subcellular localisation of chitinase and of its potential substrate in tomato root tissues infected byFusarium oxysporum f. sp.radicis-lycopersici. Plant Physiol 92: 1108–1120 (1990).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bol JF, Linthorst HJM, Cornelissen BJC: Plant pathogenesis-related proteins induced by virus infection. Annu Rev Phytopath 28: 113–138 (1990).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Broglie K, Chet I, Holliday M, Cressman R, Biddle P, Knowlton S, Mauvais CJ, Broglie R: Transgenic plants with enhanced resistance to the fungal pathogenRhizoctonia solani. Science 254: 1194–1197 (1991).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Broglie KE, Gaynor JJ, Broglie RM: Ethylene-regulated gene expression: Molecular cloning of the genes encoding an endochitinase fromPhaseolus vulgaris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83: 6820–6824 (1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Wit PJGM: A light and scanning-electron microscopic study of infection of tomato plants by virulent and avirulent races ofCladosporium fulvum. Neth J Plant Path 83: 109–122 (1977).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    de Wit PJGM, Flach W: Differential accumulation of phytoalexins in tomato leaves, but not in fruits after inoculation with virulent and avirulent races ofCladosporium fulvum. Physiol Plant Path 15: 257–267 (1979).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dixon RA: The phytoalexin response: Elicitation, signalling and control of host gene expression. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 61: 239–292 (1986).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Durand-Tardif M: Etude de l'induction, par l'ethephon, de l'expression du gène codant pour la chitinase chez la tomate et analyse de la structure de ce gène. Doctoral Dissertation, Université de Paris Sud, Paris (1986).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fukuda Y, Ohme M, Shinshi H: Gene structure and expression of a tobacco endochitinase gene in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Plant Mol Biol 16: 89–93 (1991).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hodgson CP, Fisk RZ: Hybridisation probe size control optimised ‘oligolabelling’. Nucl Acids Res 15: 6295 (1987).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Joosten MHAJ, Bergmans CJB, Meulenhoff EJS, Cornelissen BJC, de Wit PJGM: Purification and serological characterisation of three basic 15 kilodalton pathogenesis-related proteins from tomato. Plant Physiol 94: 585–591 (1990).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Joosten MHAJ, de Wit PJGM: Identification of several pathogenesis-related proteins in tomato leaves inoculated withCladosporium fulvum (syn.Fulvia fulva) as 1,3-β-glucanases and chitinases. Plant Physiol 89: 945–951 (1989).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kauss H: Some aspects of calcium-dependent regulation in plant metabolism. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 38: 47–72 (1987).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Keen NT, Yoshikawa M: β-1,3-Endoglucanase from soybean releases elicitor-active carbohydrates from fungal cell walls. Plant Physiol 71: 460–465 (1983).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lamb CJ, Lawton MA, Dron M, Dixon RA: Signals and transduction mechanisms for activation of plant defences against microbial attack. Cell 56: 215–224 (1989).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Linthorst HJM: Pathogenesis-related proteins of plants. Crit Rev Plant Sci 10: 123–150 (1991).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Linthorst HJM, Danhash N, Brederode FT, van Kan JAL, de Wit PJGM, Bol JF: Tobacco and tomato PR proteins homologous towin and pro-hevein lack the hevein domain. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 4: 586–592 (1991).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Linthorst HJM, van Loon LC, van Rossum CMA, Mayer A, Bol JF: Analysis of acidic and basic chitinases from tobacco and petunia and their constitutive expression in transgenic tobacco. Mol Plant-Microbe Interact 3: 252–258 (1990).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mauch F, Mauch-Mani B, Boller T: Antifungal hydrolases in pea tissue. II inhibition of fungal growth by combinations of chitinase and β-1–3-glucanase. Plant Physiol 88: 936–942 (1988).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nairn CJ, Winesett L, Ferl RJ: Nucleotide sequence of an actin gene fromArabidopsis thaliana. Gene 65: 247–257 (1988).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neuhaus J-M, Sticher L, Meins FJr, Boller T: A short C-terminal sequence is necessary and sufficient for the targeting of chitinases to the plant vacuole. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 10362–10366 (1991).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pegg GF, Vessey JC: Chitinase activity inLycopersicon esculentum and its relationship to thein vivo lysis ofVerticillium albo-atrum mycelium. Physiol Plant Path 19: 371–382 (1973).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1989).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sanger F, Nicklen S, Coulson AR: DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74: 5463–5467 (1977).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schlumbaum A, Mauch F, Vögeli U, Boller T: Plant chitinases are potent inhibitors of fungal growth. Nature 324: 365–367 (1986).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shinshi H, Neuhaus J-M, Ryals J, Meins FJr: Structure of a tobacco endochitinase gene: evidence that different chitinase genes can arise by transposition of sequences encoding a cysteine-rich domain. Plant Mol Biol 14: 357–368 (1990).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sticher L, Hofsteenge J, Milani A, Neuhaus J-H, Meins FJr: Vacuolar chitinases of tobacco: a new class of hydroxyproline-containing proteins. Science 257: 655–657 (1992).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Vance CP, Kirk TK, Sherwood RT: Lignification as a mechanism of disease resistance. Annu Rev Phytopath 18: 259–288 (1980).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    van Kan JAL, Joosten MHAJ, Wagemakers CAM, van den Berg-Velthuis, de Wit PJGM: Differential accumulation of mRNAs encoding extracellular and intracellular PR proteins in tomato induced by virulent and avirulent races ofCladosporium fulvum. Plant Mol Biol 20: 513–527 (1992).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Loon LC, Gerritsen YAM, Ritter CE: Identification, purification and characterisation of pathogenesis-related proteins from virus-infected Samsun NN tobacco leaves. Plant Mol Biol 9: 593–609 (1987).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    van Parijs J, Broekaert WF, Goldstein IJ, Peumans WJ: Hevein: an antifungal protein from rubber-tree (Hevea brasiliensis) latex. Planta 183: 258–264 (1991).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Woloshuk CP, Meulenhoff JS, Sela-Buurlage M, van den Elzen PJM, Cornelissen BJC: Pathogen-induced proteins with inhibitory activity towardPhytophthora infestans. Plant Cell 3: 619–628 (1991).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wright CS, Gavilanes F, Peterson DL: Primary structure of wheat germ agglutinin isolectin 2. Peptide order deduced from x-ray structure. Biochemistry 24: 280–287 (1984).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Wubben JP, Joosten MHAJ, van Kan JAL, de Wit PJGM: Subcellular localization of plant chitinases and 1,3-β-glucanases inCladosporium fulvum (syn.Fulvia fulva)-infected tomato leaves. Physiol Mol Plant Path 41: 23–32 (1992).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadia Danhash
    • 1
  • Cornelia A. M. Wagemakers
    • 1
  • Jan A. L. van Kan
    • 1
  • Pierre J. G. M. de Wit
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhytopathologyAgricultural UniversityWageningenNetherlands

Personalised recommendations