Euphytica

, Volume 24, Issue 2, pp 497–502 | Cite as

Is intergeneric hybridization in the Leguminosae possible?

  • J. A. McComb
Article

Summary

An exmination was made of the validity of intergeneric legume hybrids listed by Knobloch (Taxon 21:97). Insufficient evidence was found for these supposed crosses, their previous acceptance being due to misleading paper titles, confusion of vegetative with generic hybrids, the occurrence of patrocliny, and misplaced generic boundaries. There is a possibility of hybridization between Pisum and Vicia.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ballon, F. B. & T. L., York, 1959. Crossing the common and scarlet bean (Phaseolus spp.) with Vigna species. Philipp. Agric. 42: 454–455.Google Scholar
  2. Brewbaker, J. L. & G. C., Emery, 1962. Pollen radiobotany. Rad. Bot. 1: 101–154.Google Scholar
  3. Bleier, H., 1928. Karyological research on Lens x Vicia hybrids. (Germ). Genetica 11: 111–118.Google Scholar
  4. Deodikar, G. B. & C. V., Thakar, 1956. Cytotaxonomic evidence for the affinity between Cajanus indicus Spreng and certain erect species of Atylosia W. & A. Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci. 43: 37–45.Google Scholar
  5. Fam, Ba Fong, 1969. Overcoming incompatibility in the remote hybridization of pea with bean by irradiating the pollen of the paternal form. (Ru.). Sb. rabot molodykh. uchenickh. Vses. selekts.-genet. in-t 69–71.Google Scholar
  6. Fruwirth, C., 1923. A noteworthy lentil-vetch hybrid. (Germ.). Genetica 5: 481–496.Google Scholar
  7. Grigoreva, N. M., Z. E. Zuzmin & A. V. Lanina, 1968. All Union meeting on distant hybridization in plants and animals. (Ru.). Vestn. selskohoz. Nauk. No. 8: 101–110.Google Scholar
  8. Hooker, J. D., 1879. The flora of British India. Reeve & Co., Ashford, England.Google Scholar
  9. Knobloch, I. W., 1972. Intergeneric hybridization of flowering plants. Taxon 21: 97–104.Google Scholar
  10. Knox, R. B., R. B., Willing & A. E., Ashford, 1972. Role of pollen wall proteins as recognition substances in interspecific incompatibility in poplars. Nature 237: 381–383.Google Scholar
  11. Kumar, L. S. S., M. V., Thombre & R., D'Cruz, 1958. Cytological studies of an intergeneric hybrid of Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp. and Atylosia lineata W. & A.. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (B) 47: 252–262.Google Scholar
  12. Mackie, W. W. & F. L., Smith, 1935. Evidence of field hybridization in beans. J. Am. Soc. Agron. 27: 903–909.Google Scholar
  13. McComb, J. A., 1974. New techniques for plant breeding. J. Aust. Inst. agric. Sci. 40: 3–10.Google Scholar
  14. Novikov, V. V., 1940. Pea-bean hybrids. (Ru.). Jarovizaciza 3 (30): 106–118.Google Scholar
  15. Roy, A. & N. D., De, 1965. Intergeneric hybridization of Cajanus and Atylosia. Sci. Cult. 31: 93–95.Google Scholar
  16. Saginadze, G. V., 1961. Hybridization of Phaseolus vulgaris (L.) Savi x Glycine hispida (Moench.) Maz. Preliminary communication. (Ru.). Tbilisskii Bot. Inst. Trudy 21: 301–8.Google Scholar
  17. Saginadze, G. V., 1967. Nature of morphogenetic processes in remote hybridization of some pulses. (Georgian). Trans. Bot. Inst. Acad. Sci. Georgian SSR: (Ser. cult. Flora) 25 No. 2: 48–71.Google Scholar
  18. Sasonkina, M. M., 1935. Intergeneric hybridization of leguminous plants by the method of I. V. Michurin. Preliminary communication. (Ru.). Trudy Sel'skokhozjaistvennoi Akademii im. K. A. Timirjazeva 1 (2): 141–156.Google Scholar
  19. Sobolev, N. A., G. K., Adamchuk & E. D., Zhila, 1970. Apomixis in peas. (Ru.). Apomiksis i selektsiya. Moscow USSR Nauka. 213–220.Google Scholar
  20. Sobolev, N. A., S. N., Agarkova & G. K., Adamchuk, 1971a. Overcoming incompatibility between pea and broad bean. II. Characteristics of progeny raised from seeds in pea-bean crosses. (Ru.). Nauch. tr. VN11 zernobob. kultur. 3: 147–156.Google Scholar
  21. Sobolev, N. A., S. N., Agarkova & G. K., Adamchuk, 1971b. Overcoming cross incompatibility between pea and broad beans. 1. The effect of X irradiation on incompatibility. (Ru.). Nauch. tr. VN11 zernobob. kultur. 3: 136–146.Google Scholar
  22. Sobolev, N. A. & V. P., Bugrii, 1970. A spontaneous intergeneric hybrid in the vetch tribe and its characteristics. (Ru.). Otdalen. gibridizatsiya rast. Moscow, USSR, Kolos 415–421.Google Scholar
  23. Sobolev, N. A., E. D., Zhila & G. K., Adamchuk, 1968. Intergeneric hybridization in the Vicieae tribe. (Ru.). Rastenievodstro, selektsiya i lesovodstro. No. 1. Moscow, USSR, Kolos 86–94.Google Scholar
  24. Sokolskaja, B., 1966. Production of a pea with a resistant stem. (Ru.). Selekcija i Semenovodstvo No. 3: 46–48.Google Scholar
  25. Stanton, W. R., 1964. Draft report on the work of the grain legume section for 1961. Reg. Res. Stn. Min. Agric. Sawan (Nigeria), pp. 62.Google Scholar
  26. Stegajlo, T. A., 1963. Certain laws governing the transmission of parental characters in crosses between pea and vetch From: What is new in methodology of breeding fields beans, peas and vetches. (Ru.). Sel'hozizdat, Moscow, 98–102.Google Scholar
  27. Stettler, R. F., 1968. Irradiated mentor pollen: its use in remote hybridization of black cotton wood. Nature 219: 746–747.Google Scholar
  28. Sulga, P. M., 1962. Extend the use of vegetative hybridization in breeding grain legumes. (Ru.). Selekcija i Semenovodstvo 27 (3): 46–48.Google Scholar
  29. Sulga, P. M., 1964. Vegetative hybridization of forage plants. Science for agriculture. Plant growing. (Ru.). Selhozizdat, Moscow.Google Scholar
  30. Tsitsin, N. V., 1946. Studies on vegetative and sexual hybridization between herbaceous and woody plants. (Ru.). Trudy Zonal. Inst. Zernovovo Khoziaistva Nechernozemnoi Polosy SSSR 13: 13–31.Google Scholar
  31. Tsitsin, N. V., 1947/8. Peas growing on trees—New results of hybridization. (Germ.). Universum (5): 97–98.Google Scholar
  32. Yarnell, S. H., 1965. Cytogenics of vegetable crops. IV. Legumes ctd. Bot. Rev. 31: 247–330.Google Scholar
  33. Verdcourt, B., 1970. Studies in the Leguminosae-Papilionoideae for the ‘Flora of Tropical East Africa’. IV. Kew Bull. 24: 507–569.Google Scholar
  34. Zadrazil, K., 1960. Cocak—a vetch with lentil-like seeds as an edible legume and as a forage plant. (Ru.). Sborn. csl. Akad. zemed. Ved.: Rada rostlinna Vyroba 33: 631–638.Google Scholar
  35. Zhila, E. D., 1966. Use of γ irradiation to overcome incompatibility between leguminous crops. (Ru.). Nauc. Trud. Vses. nauc.-issled. Inst. zernobob. Kult. (Sci. Trans. All-Un. sci-res. Inst., Inst. Pulse Crops) No. 1: 70–76.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© H. Veenman en zonen b.v., Wageningen 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. McComb
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AgronomyUniversity of Western AustraliaNedlandsAustralia

Personalised recommendations