Hydrobiologia

, Volume 202, Issue 1–2, pp 27–31 | Cite as

The effects of argulosis-saprolehniasis on the growth and production of Cyprinus carpoi

  • R. N. Singhal
  • S. Jeet
  • Ronald W. Davies
Article

Abstract

Growth profiles of male Cyprinus carpio, 12 uninfected (healthy) and 12 infected with the crustacean Argulus indicus and associated fungus Saprolegnia sp. are presented. The fish were maintained under controlled conditions and provided with ad libitum food for 8 weeks. The instantaneous (G) and relative (h) rates of growth, and production (P) in uninfected carp (0.003 to 0.036 g.d−1, 0.29 to 3.68%, 0.25 to 3.23 g respectively) were much higher than those of infected carp ( − 0.007 to 0.021 g.d −1, 0.71 to 2.17%, 0.59 to 1.76 g). The condition factor (K) for uninfected carp was 4.5 to 4.8 compared to 2.6 to 3.0 for infected carp. During each of the 8 wk the weekly change in weight of infected carp was about 4% less than that of uninfected carp. These data show that Argulus-Saprolegnia infections significantly suppress carp growth and indicate that comparative growth rates can be used as indicators of parasite stress.

Key words

growth production carp parasites argulosis saprolegniasis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bardach, J. E., J. H. Ryther & W. O. McLarney, 1972. Aquaculture, Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
  2. Carlin, B., 1955. Tagging of salmon smolts in the river Lagan. Rep. Inst. Freshwat. Res. Drottningholm 36: 57–74.Google Scholar
  3. F. A. O., 1986. Fisheries in the food economy. FAO of United Nations. Fisheries Report No. 181.Google Scholar
  4. Grady, K. T. & P. B. Spillett, 1985. A comparison of the pond culture of carp, Cyprinus carpio L., in Britain and mainland Europe. J. Fish. Biol. 26: 701–714.Google Scholar
  5. Hickling, C. F., 1962. Fish Culture. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  6. Hoffman, G. L., 1962. Parasitic deseases of laboratory fishes and their control. J. Fish. Dis. 3: 348–352.Google Scholar
  7. Huet, M., 1973. Textbook of Fish Culture. Fishing News Book Ltd.Google Scholar
  8. Ricker, W. E., 1979. Growth rates and models, p. 677–743. In W. S. Hoar, D. J. Randall & J. R. Brett (ed.). Fish Physiology. Vol. 8. Academic Press, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  9. Shah, K. L., B. C. Jha & A. G. Jhingran, 1977. Observations on some aquatic phycomycetes pathogenic to eggs and fry of freshwater fish and prawns. Aquaculture 12: 141–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Singhal, R. N., S. Jeet & R. W. Davies, 1984. Ectoparasites of the freshwater food fishes of Haryana. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Anim. Sci.) 93: 663–69.Google Scholar
  11. Singhal, R. N., S. Jeet & R. W. Davies, 1985. The relationship between changes in selected physico-chemical properties of water and the occurence of fish parasites in Haryana (India). Trop. Ecol. 26: 56–58.Google Scholar
  12. Singhal, R. N., S. Jeet & R. W. Davies, 1986. Chemotherapy of six ectoparasitic diseases of cultured fish. Aquaculture 54: 165–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Singhal, R. N., S. Jeet & R. W. Davies, 1987. A systematic survey of the endoparasites of cultured fish in Haryana (India). Zool. Anz. 218: 137–144.Google Scholar
  14. Tam, W. H. & P. D. Payson, 1986. Effects of chronic exposure to sublethal pH on growth, egg production, and ovulation in brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 43: 275–280.Google Scholar
  15. Willoughby, L. G., 1985. Rapid preliminary screening of Saprolegnia on fish. J. Fish. Dis. 8: 473–476.Google Scholar
  16. Zar, J. H., 1984. Biostatistical Analysis. In Prentice-Hall Biological Sciences Series, W. D. McElroy & C. P. Swanson, (eds). Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.Google Scholar
  17. Zhingran, V. G., 1982. Fish and Fisheries of India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation (India), Delhi, pp. 486–491.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. N. Singhal
    • 1
  • S. Jeet
    • 2
  • Ronald W. Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Ecology (Aquatic Ecology Group), Department of Biological SciencesThe University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Department of ZoologyKurukshetra UniversityKurukshetraIndia

Personalised recommendations