Hydrobiologia

, Volume 216, Issue 1, pp 335–342 | Cite as

A review of cnidarians and ctenophores feeding on competitors in the plankton

  • Jennifer E. Purcell
Proceedings V. Pelagic coelenterates

Abstract

Predation among pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores is reviewed. The diets of semaeostome scyphomedusae and hydromedusae commonly include other gelatinous zooplanktivores. However, few species of siphonophores and ctenophores are known to consume other gelatinous species. Most of these species can be said to exhibit intraguild predation, since they consume species that potentially compete with them for food. In addition, some hydromedusan and ctenophore species may consume other gelatinous zooplanktivores exclusively. Characteristics of cnidarians and ctenophores as predators and as prey of other gelatinous species are discussed.

Key words

scyphomedusae hydromedusae siphonophores ctenophores predation competition 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvariño, A., 1985. Predation in the plankton realm; mainly with reference to fish larvae. Investnes mar. Cent. interdisc. Ciencias mar. 2: 1–122.Google Scholar
  2. Arai, M. N., 1980. Growth rates of Aequorea medusae. In P. Tardent & R. Tardent (eds), Development and Cellular Biology of Coelenterates. Elsevier/North Holland Press, Amsterdam: 163–169.Google Scholar
  3. Arai, M. N. & J. R. Jacobs, 1980. Interspecific predation of common Strait of Georgia planktonic coelenterates: laboratory evidence. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 37: 120–123.Google Scholar
  4. Bailey, K. M. & E. D. Houde, 1989. Predation on eggs and larvae of marine fishes and the recruitment problem. Adv. mar. Biol. 25: 1–83.Google Scholar
  5. Biggs, D. C., 1976. Nutritional ecology of Agalma okeni and other siphonophores from the epipelagic western North Atlantic Ocean. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology/Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution Joint Program.Google Scholar
  6. Brewer, R. H., 1989. The annual pattern of feeding, growth, and sexual reproduction in Cyanea (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa) in the Niantic River estuary, Connecticut. Biol. Bull. 176: 272–281.Google Scholar
  7. Cargo, D. G. & L. P. Schultz, 1967. Further observations on the biology of the sea nettle Chrysaora quinquecirrha and jellyfishes in Chesapeake Bay. Chesapeake Sci. 8: 209–220.Google Scholar
  8. Delap, M. J., 1901. Notes on the rearing of Chrysaora isosceles in an aquarium. Ir. Nat. 10: 25–28.Google Scholar
  9. Delap, M. J., 1905. Notes on the rearing, in an aquarium, of Cyanea lamarcki Péron & Lesueur. Rep. Sea Inld Fish. Ire. (1902–03) 2: 20–22.Google Scholar
  10. Delap, M. J., 1907. Notes on the rearing, in an aquarium, of Aurelia aurita L. and Pelagia perla (Slabber). Rep. Sea. Inld Fish. Ire. (1905) 2: 22–26.Google Scholar
  11. Donaldson, S., G. O. Mackie & A. Roberts, 1980. Preliminary observations on escape swimming and giant neurons in Aglantha digitale (Hydromedusae: Trachylina). Can. J. Zool. 58: 549–552.Google Scholar
  12. Fancett, M. S., 1988. Diet and prey selectivity of scyphomedusae from Port Phillip Bay, Australia. Mar. Biol. 98: 503–509.Google Scholar
  13. Feigenbaum, D. & M. Kelly, 1984. Changes in the lower Chesapeake Bay food chain in presence of the sea nettle Chrysaora quinquecirrha (Scyphomedusa). Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 19: 39–47.Google Scholar
  14. Fraser, J. H., 1969. Experimental feeding of some medusae and chaetognatha. J. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 26: 1743–1762.Google Scholar
  15. Greve, W., 1971. Ökologische Untersuchungen an Pleurobrachia pileus. 1. Kreilanduntersuchungen. Helgoländer wiss. Meeresunters. 22: 303–325.Google Scholar
  16. Greve, W., 1981. Invertebrate predator control in a coastal marine ecosystem: the significance of Beroë gracilis (Ctenophora). Kieler Meeresforsch. 5: 211–217.Google Scholar
  17. Hamner, W. M., 1983. Gelatinous zooplankton of the Bering Sea. PROBES: Processes and Resources of the Bering Sea Shelf. Final Report, Vol. 2: 211–229.Google Scholar
  18. Hamner, W. M., L. P. Madin, A. L. Alldredge, R. W. Gilmer & P. P. Hamner, 1975. Underwater observations of gelatinous zooplankton: sampling problems, feeding biology, and behavior. Limnol. Oceanogr. 20: 907–917.Google Scholar
  19. Hamond, R. & R. B. Williams, 1977. The Ctenophora, Scyphozoa and Anthozoa of Norfolk, with additional notes on the Hydrozoa. Trans. Norfolk Norwich Nat. Soc. 24: 58–74.Google Scholar
  20. Harbison, G. R., 1984. On the classification and evolution of the Ctenophora. In S. C. Morris, J. D. George, R. Gibson & H. M. Platt (eds), The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford: 78–100.Google Scholar
  21. Harbison, G. R., L. P. Madin & N. R. Swanberg, 1978. On the natural history and distribution of oceanic ctenophores. Deep-Sea Res. 25: 233–256.Google Scholar
  22. Hirota, J., 1974. Quantitative natural history of Pleurobrachia bachei in La Jolla Bight. Fishery Bull. natn. ocean. atmos. Admn. 72: 295–335.Google Scholar
  23. Horridge, G. A., 1965. Macrocilia with numerous shafts from the lips of the ctenophore Beroë. Proc. r. Soc., Lond. (Ser. B) 162: 351–363.Google Scholar
  24. Hyman, L. H., 1940. The invertebrates: Protozoa through Ctenophora. McGraw-Hill, N.Y., 726 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Larson, R. J., 1987a. First report of the little-known scyphomedusa Drymonema dalmatinum in the Caribbean Sea, with notes on its biology. Bull. mar. Sci. 40: 437–441.Google Scholar
  26. Larson, R. J., 1987b. A note on the feeding, growth, and reproduction of the epipelagic scyphomedusa Pelagia noctiluca (Forskål). Biol. Oceanogr. 4: 447–454.Google Scholar
  27. Lebour, M. V., 1922. The food of plankton organisms. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 12: 644–677.Google Scholar
  28. Lebour, M. V., 1923. The food of plankton organisms. II. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 13: 70–92.Google Scholar
  29. Littleford, R. A., 1939. Distribution of Rathkea. Nature, Lond. 143: 1070–1071.Google Scholar
  30. Loginova, N. P. & N. M. Perzova, 1967. Some data on ecology of feeding of pelagic Coelenterata in the White Sea. Issled. Funny Morei 7: 21–28.Google Scholar
  31. Miller, R. J., 1974. Distribution and biomass of an estuarine ctenophore population, Mnemiopsis leidyi (A. Agassiz). Chesapeake Sci. 15: 1–8.Google Scholar
  32. Mills, C. E. & R. L. Miller, 1984. Ingestion of a medusa (Aegina citrea) by the nematocyst-containing ctenophore Haeckelia rubra (formerly Euchlora rubra): phylogenetic implications. Mar. Biol. 78: 215–221.Google Scholar
  33. Möller, H., 1980. Scyphomedusae as predators and food competitors of larval fish. Kieler Meeresforsch. 28: 90–100.Google Scholar
  34. Nelson, T. C., 1925. Occurrence and feeding habits of ctenophores in New Jersey coastal waters. Biol. Bull. 48: 92–111.Google Scholar
  35. Phillips, P. J., W. D. Burke & E. J. Keener, 1969. Observations on the trophic significance of jellyfishes in the Mississippi Sound with quantitative data on the associative behavior of small fishes with medusae. Trans. am. Fish. Soc. 98: 703–712.Google Scholar
  36. Plotnikova, E. D., 1961. On the diet of medusae in the littoral of eastern Murman. In M. M. Kamshilov (ed.), Hydrological and Biological Features of the Shore Waters of Murman. Akad. Nauk. USSR Kolsk. Fil.: 153–166.Google Scholar
  37. Polis, G. A., C. A. Myers & R. D. Holt, 1989. The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. A. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 297–330.Google Scholar
  38. Purcell, J. E., 1981. Dietary composition and diel feeding patterns of epipelagic siphonophores. Mar. Biol. 65: 83–90.Google Scholar
  39. Purcell, J. E., 1984. Predation on fish larvae by Physalia physalis, the Portuguese man of war. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 19: 189–191.Google Scholar
  40. Purcell, J. E., 1985. Predation on fish eggs and larvae by pelagic cnidarians and ctenophores. Bull. mar. Sci. 37: 739–755.Google Scholar
  41. Purcell, J. E., 1990. Soft-bodied zooplankton predators and competitors of herring larvae at spawning grounds in British Columbia. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 47: 505–515.Google Scholar
  42. Purcell, J. E., in press. Predation by Aequorea victoria on other species of potentially competing pelagic hydrozoans. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.Google Scholar
  43. Purcell, J. E. & J. J. Grover, 1990. Predation and food limitation as causes of mortality of larval herring at a spawning ground in British Columbia. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 59: 55–61.Google Scholar
  44. Purcell, J. E. & C. E. Mills, 1988. The correlation between nematocyst types and diets in pelagic Hydrozoa. In D. A. Hessinger & H. M. Lenhoff (eds), The Biology of Nematocysts. Academic Press, Inc., San Diego: 463–485.Google Scholar
  45. Spencer, A. N., 1975. Behavior and electrical activity in the hydrozoan Proboscidactyla flavicirrata (Brandt). II. The medusa. Biol. Bull. 149: 236–250.Google Scholar
  46. Strand, S. W. & W. M. Hamner, 1988. Predatory behavior of Phacellophora camtschatica and size-selective predation upon Aurelia aurita (Scyphozoa: Cnidaria) in Saanich Inlet, British Columbia. Mar. Biol. 99: 409–414.Google Scholar
  47. Swanberg, N., 1974. The feeding behavior of Beroë ovata. Mar. Biol. 24: 69–76.Google Scholar
  48. Zelickman, E. A., V. I. Gelfand & M. A. Shifrin, 1969. Growth, reproduction and nutrition of some Barents Sea hydromedusae in natural aggregations. Mar. Biol. 4: 167–173.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer E. Purcell
    • 1
  1. 1.Horn Point Environmental LaboratoryCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations