Habitat-specific predation susceptibilities of a littoral rotifer to two invertebrate predators
- 125 Downloads
- 19 Citations
Abstract
The rotifer Euchlanis dilatata lives associated with submerged vegetation in the littoral zone of freshwater lakes and ponds. I assessed habitat-specific predation susceptibilities for this rotifer in the presence of three aquatic macrophytes (Myriophyllum exalbescens, Elodea canadensis, and Ceratophyllum demersum) and two predators (damselfly nymphs — Enallagma carunculata; and cnidarians — Hydra). Rotifer survival was greatest on Myriophyllum in the presence of both predators. Conversely, the presence of the other macrophyte species actually increase rotifer suspectibility to predation by damselfly nymphs. I also manipulated plant structural complexity. As predicted, decreasing the relative complexity of each plant resulted in lower rotifer survival.
Key words
rotifer predation habitat complexityPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Brooks, J. L. & S. I. Dodson, 1965. Predation, body size, and composition of the plankton. Science 150: 28–35.Google Scholar
- Corbet, P. S., 1980. Biology of Odonata. Ann. Rev. Ent. 25: 189–217.Google Scholar
- Cook, W. L. & F. A. Streams, 1984. Fish predation on Notonecta (Hemiptera): relationship between prey risk and habitat utilization. Oecologia 64: 177–183.Google Scholar
- Cyr, H. & J. A. Downing, 1988. The abundance of phytophilous invertebrates on different species of submerged macrophytes. Freshwat. Biol. 20: 365–374.Google Scholar
- Dvorak, J. & E. P. H. Best, 1982. Macro-invertebrate communities associated with the macrophytes of Lake Vechten: structural and functional relationships. Hydrobiologia 95 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 11): 115–126.Google Scholar
- Gause. G. F., 1934. The struggle for existence. Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, J. J. & C. E. Williamson, 1978. Predator-prey behavior and its effect on rotifer survival in associations of Mesocyclops edax, Asplanchna girodi, Polyarthra vulgaris, and Keratella cochlearis. Oecologia 26: 13–22.Google Scholar
- Gilinsky, E., 1984. The role of fish predation and spacial heterogeneity in determining benthic community structure. Ecology 65: 455–468.Google Scholar
- Hacker, S. D. & R. S. Steneck, 1990. Habitat architecture and the abundance and body-size-dependent selection of a phytal amphipod. Ecology 71: 2269–2285.Google Scholar
- Heck, K. L. & L. B. Crowder, 1991. Habitat structure and predator-prey interactions in vegetated aquatic systems. In Habitat structure. The physical arrangement of objects in space, Bell, S. S., E.D. McCoy & H. R. Mushinsky (eds), Chapman and Hall, New York: 281–299.Google Scholar
- Huffaker, C. B., 1958. Experimental studies on predation: dispersion factors and predator-prey oscillations. Hilgardia 27: 343–383.Google Scholar
- Jaenike, J. & R. D. Holt, 1991. Genetic variation for habitat preference: evidence and explanations. Am. Nat. 137: S67-S90.Google Scholar
- Jeffries, M. J. & J. H. Lawton, 1984. Enemy free space and the structure of ecological communities. Biol. J. linn. Soc. 23: 269–286.Google Scholar
- Krecker, F. H., 1939. A comparative study of the animal population of certain submerged aquatic plants. Ecology 20: 553–562.Google Scholar
- Leber, K., 1985. The influence of predatory decapods, refuge and microhabitat selection on seagrass communities. Ecology 66: 1951–1964.Google Scholar
- Lewis, F. G., III. 1984. The distribution of macrobenthic crustaceans associated with Thalassia, Halodule, and bare sand substrata. Mar. Ecol. Progress Ser. 19: 101–113.Google Scholar
- Moore, M. V. & J. J. Gilbert, 1987. Age-specific Chaoborus predation on rotifer prey. Freshwat. Biol. 17: 223–236.Google Scholar
- Mittlebach, G., 1986. Predator-mediated habitat use: some consequences for species interactions. Envir. Biol. Fish. 16: 159–169.Google Scholar
- Murdoch, W. W. & A. Oaten, 1975. Predation and population stability. Adv. ecol. Res. 9: 2–132.Google Scholar
- Parsons, P. A., 1983. Ecobehavioral genetics: habitats and colonists. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 14: 35–55.Google Scholar
- Pulliam, H. R. & B. J. Danielson, 1991. Sources, sinks, and habitat selection: a landscape perspective on population dynamics. Am. Nat. 137: S50-S66.Google Scholar
- Resetarits, W. J., Jr. & H. M. Wilbur, 1989. Choice of oviposition site by Hyla chrysoscelis: role of predators and competitors. Ecology 70: 220–228.Google Scholar
- Rooke, B., 1986. Macroinvertebrates associated with macrophytes and plastic imitations in the Eramosa river, Ontario, Canada. Arch. Hydrobiol. 106: 307–325.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. S. & P. D. N. Hebert, 1989. The effect of Hydra on the outcome of competition between Daphnia and Simocephalus. Biol. Bull. 176: 147–154.Google Scholar
- Schwartz, S. S., B. J. Hann & P. D. N. Hebert, 1983. The feeding ecology of Hydra and possible implications in the structuring of pond zooplankton communities. Biol. Bull. 164: 136–142.Google Scholar
- Starkweather P. L. & E. J. Walsh, 1989. Influence of cyanobacterial diet on Asplanchna predation risk in Brachionus calyciflorus. Hydrobiologia 186–187 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 52): 35–38.Google Scholar
- Stemberger, R. S. & J. J. Gilbert, 1987. Defenses of planktonic rotifers against predators. In Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. W. C. Kerfoot & A. Sih (eds). Univ. Press of New England, Hanover.Google Scholar
- Taylor, R. J., 1984. Predation. Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
- Thompson, J. N., 1988. Variation in preference and specificity in monophagous and diplophagous swallowtail butterflies. Evolution 42: 118–128.Google Scholar
- Wallace, R. L., 1977. Distribution of the sessile rotifers in an acid bog. Arch. Hydrobiol. 4: 478–505.Google Scholar
- Walsh, E. J., 1992. Ecological and genetics aspects of the population biology of the littoral rotifer Euchlanis dilatata. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.Google Scholar
- Williamson, C. E., 1983. Invertebrate predation on planktonic rotifers. Hydrobiologia 104 (Dev. Hydrobiol. 14): 385–396.Google Scholar
- Williamson, C. E., M. E. Stoeckel & L. J. Schoeneck, 1989. Predation risk and the structure of freshwater communities. Oecologia 79: 76–82.Google Scholar
- Zaret, T. M., 1980. Predation and freshwater communities. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.Google Scholar