Euphytica

, Volume 75, Issue 3, pp 163–172 | Cite as

Production and performance of potato mini-tubers

  • B. S. Ahloowalia
Article
Received:
Accepted:

Summary

Production of mini-tubers as a source for seed potato was investigated by growing in soil micropropagated plants and micro-tubers produced from micropropagated plants. Cultures of several cultivars were initiated from indexed tubers and multiplied on modified MS medium. Cultures were micropropagated by using a modular system which allowed batch handling. Micropropagated plants produced mini-tubers in glasshouse after 70–115 days of growth in soil. A large proportion of the mini-tubers produced were between 9 and 15 mm diameter. Several factors, e.g., explant number, duration of in vitro culture and genotype influenced mini-tubers production. Micropropagated plants after culture of 86 days or longer produced micro-tubers ca. 2 to 10 mm diameter. Plants, which formed micro-tubers in vitro, produced less number of mini-tubers in soil. Micro-tubers produced 1 to 3 mini-tubers when grown in soil in chain-type paper pots, but produced conventional sized tubers when grown in soil under plastic polytunnel. Mini-tuber number varied widely between potato cultivars; cvs. Bintje and British Queen produced more mini-tubers than the other cultivars. Mini-tubers developed green hard skins when kept in light for 3 weeks, and could be stored in dark at 4° C upto 6 months. In a field trial, small mini-tubers ca. 5–10 mm diameter produced more but smaller tubers than mini-tubers ca. 15–20 mm diameter. The micropropagated plants and the plants grown from mini-tubers were genetically stable, and did not show any morphological aberrations except for one variegated plant among the several thousand produced. It is concluded that the production of mini-tubers by soil planting of micropropagated plants is a rapid and efficient method for producing seed potato tubers.

Key words

Solanum tuberosum potato mini-tubers in vitro culture micropropagation genetic stability field performance 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ahloowalia, B.S., 1982. Plant regeneration from callus culture in potato. Euphytica 31: 755–759.Google Scholar
  2. Ahloowalia, B.S., 1988. A modular micropropagation system for seed potato production. Abstract No. 5–37. International Congress on Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding-Biotechnology for the Breeder, EUCARPIA, Helsingor, Denmark.Google Scholar
  3. Cassells, A.C., E.M.Goetz & S.Austin, 1983. Phenotypic variation in plants produced from lateral buds, stem explants and single-cell-derived callus of potato. Potato Res. 26: 367–372.Google Scholar
  4. Copeland, R.B., 1982. Micropropagation of potatoes. Agric. Northern Ireland 57: 250–253.Google Scholar
  5. Espinoza, N.O., R.Estrada, D.Silva-Rodriguez, P.Tovar, R.Lizarraga & J.H.Dodds, 1986. The potato: A model crop plant for tissue culture. Outlook on Agriculture 15: 21–26.Google Scholar
  6. Estrada, R., P.Tovar & J.H.Dodds, 1986. Induction of in vitro tubers in a broad range of potato genotypes. Plant, Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 7: 3–10.Google Scholar
  7. Goodwin, P.B., Y.C.Kim & T.Adisarwanto, 1980. Propagation of potato by shoot-tip culture. 1. Shoot multiplication. Potato Res. 23: 9–18.Google Scholar
  8. Hussey, G. & N.J.Stacey, 1984. Factors affecting the formation of in vitro tubers of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Ann. Bot. 53: 565–578.Google Scholar
  9. Murashige, T. & F.Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiologia Pl. 15: 473–497.Google Scholar
  10. Novak, F.J., J.Zadina, V.Horackova & I.Maskova, 1980. The effect of growth regulators on meristem tip development and in vitro multiplication of Solanum tuberosum L. plants. Potato Res. 23: 155–166.Google Scholar
  11. Roca, W.M., N.O.Espinoza, M.R.Roca & J.E.Bryan, 1978. A tissue culture method for the rapid propagation of potatoes. Amer. Potato J. 55: 691–701.Google Scholar
  12. Roest, S. & G.S.Bokelmann, 1980. In vitro adventitious bud technique for vegetative propagation and mutation breeding of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). 1. Vegetative propagation in vitro through adventitious shoot formation. Potato Res. 23: 176–181.Google Scholar
  13. Sluis, C. & C.Rivera, 1984. Microtubers. Spudman 1: 14–16.Google Scholar
  14. Wang, P. & C.Hu, 1982. In vitro mass tuberization and virus-free seed potato production in Taiwan. Amer. Potato J. 59: 33–37.Google Scholar
  15. Wattimena, G., B.McCown & G.Weis, 1983. Comparative field performance of potatoes from microcultures. Amer. Potato J. 60: 27–33.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. S. Ahloowalia
    • 1
  1. 1.Kinsealy Research CenterAgriculture & Food Development AuthorityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations