Euphytica

, Volume 66, Issue 3, pp 197–206

Genotypic variation in durum wheat root systems at different stages of development in a Mediterranean environment

  • Rosella Motzo
  • Giovanna Attene
  • Mauro Deidda
Article
  • 92 Downloads

Summary

Glasshouse and field experiments were carried out to compare root growth of eight durum wheat genotypes at different stages of development with different moisture levels and in different soils. Genotypic differences were found, particularly at the stem elongation and heading stages of development, but the ranking of genotypes varied in relation to soil moisture level and fertility. Differences under optimal moisture level were mainly due to differences in tillering and disappeared by considering the root number and weight per culm. Drought caused an increase in the root-to-total-plant weight ratio (18.5 vs 14.3% at heading) but also an increase in absolute root weight. Karel, the genotype with the largest root mass under drought and the greatest proportion of roots in the upper soil layers (more than 50% in the 0–20 cm layer from heading onwards), showed the lowest yield reduction under severe stress. A large root system with a high density of roots in the upper layers of the soil profile may be beneficial in Mediterranean climates.

Key words

drought durum wheat genotypic differences roots Triticum durum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Begg, J.E. & N.C. Turner, 1976. Crop water deficits. Adv. Agron., 28: 161–217.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, O.L. & B.D. Doss, 1960. Effect of soil moisture level on root distribution of cool-season forage species. Agron. J. 52: 204–207.Google Scholar
  3. Brower, R., 1963. Some aspects of the equilibrium between overground and underground plant parts. Jaarb. Inst. Biol. Scheik. Onderz. LandbGewass, 31–39.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S.C., J.D.H. Keatinge, P.J. Gregory & P.J.M. Cooper, 1987. Effects of fertilizer, variety and location on barley production under rainfed conditions in Northern Syria. 1. Root and shoot growth. Field Crops Res.: 53–56.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, J.M. & T.F. Townley-Smith, 1984. Screening and selection techniques for improving drought resistance. In: P.B. Vase & S.G. Blixt (Eds.), Crop breeding, a contemporary basis, pp. 137–162. Pergamon, Oxford, U.K.Google Scholar
  6. Derera, N.F., D.R. Marshall & L.N. Balaam, 1969. Genetic varability in root development in relation to drought tolerance in spring wheats. Exp. Agric. 5: 327–337.Google Scholar
  7. Doss, B.D., D.A. Ashley & O.L. Bennett, 1960. Effect of soil moisture regime on root distribution of warm season forage species. Agron. J. 52: 569–572.Google Scholar
  8. Eberhart, S.A. & W.A. Russel, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36–40.Google Scholar
  9. Fischer, R.A. & R. Maurer, 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29: 897–912.Google Scholar
  10. Gregory, P.J., M. McGowan, P.V. Biscoe & B. Hunter, 1978. Water relations of winter wheat. I. Growth of the root system. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 91: 91–102.Google Scholar
  11. Gregory, P.J., 1989. The role of root characteristics in moderating the effects of drought. In: F.W.G. Baker (Ed.), Drought resistance in cereals, pp. 141–150. Published for ICSU Press by C.A.B. International.Google Scholar
  12. Hsiao, T.C. & E. Acevedo, 1974. Plant responses to water deficits, water use efficiency, and drought resistance. Agric. Met. 14: 59–84.Google Scholar
  13. Hurd, E.A., 1974. Phenotype and drought tolerance in wheat. Agric. Met. 14: 39–55.Google Scholar
  14. Mariani, B.M. & P. Novaro Manmana, 1983. Gli ambienti di coltura in Italia centro-meridionale: quali le varietà adatte? L'Inf. Agr. 4: 27630–27632.Google Scholar
  15. Monyo, J.H. & W.J. Whittington, 1970. Genetic analysis of root growth in wheat. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 74: 329–338.Google Scholar
  16. O'Toole, J.C. & W.L. Bland, 1987. Genotypic variation in crop plant root systems. Adv. Agron. 41: 91–145.Google Scholar
  17. Passioura, J.B., 1983. Roots and drought resistance. Agric. Water Manage. 7: 256–280.Google Scholar
  18. Ricciardi, L., G. Fanizza & A. Blanco, 1990. Influenza dello stress idrico sull'apparato vegetativo e radicale di genotipi di frumento duro (Triticum durum Desf. e Dasypyrum villosum L. Candargy). In: Atti XXXIV Convegno Annuale S.I.G.A., Marina di Ugento 8–11 Oct, pp. 131–132.Google Scholar
  19. Schmidt, J.W., 1983. Drought resistance and wheat breeding. Agric. Water Manag. 7: 181–194.Google Scholar
  20. Sharp, R.E. & W.J. Davies, 1985. Root growth and water intake by maize plants in drying soil. J. Exp. Bot. 36: 1441–1456.Google Scholar
  21. Townley-Smith, T.F. & E.A. Hurd, 1979. Testing and selecting for drought resistance in wheat. In: H. Mussell & R.C. Staples (Eds.), Stress physiology in crop plants, pp. 447–464. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Turner, N.C. & J.E. Begg, 1981. Plant-water relations and adaptation to stress. Plant and Soil 58: 97–131.Google Scholar
  23. Welbank, P.J., M.J. Gibb, P.J. Taylor & E.D. Williams, 1974. Root growth of cereal crops. Rothamsted Annual Report, Pt. 2, pp. 22–66.Google Scholar
  24. Zadoks, J.C., T.T. Chang & C.F. Konzak, 1974. A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Weed Res. 14: 415–421.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosella Motzo
    • 1
  • Giovanna Attene
    • 1
  • Mauro Deidda
    • 1
  1. 1.Istituto di Agronomia e Coltivazioni Erbacee, Facoltà di Scienze AgrarieUniversità di SassariSassariItalia

Personalised recommendations