Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of an Italian germplasm collection of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. through a multivariate analysis

  • Published:
Euphytica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Forty-eight accessions of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.), collected from Northern to Southern Italy, were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate analysis applied to a set of 12 quantitative traits. Four principal components were found to explain 77% of the total variation in the dependence structure. Productivity characters together with heading time and dimensions of flag leaf appeared to be the major sources of diversity among tall fescue populations. On the basis of the 4 principal components similar populations were clustered according to minimal distance analysis. Seven clusters were identified. The results of cluster analysis confirmed the presence of a remarkable diversity within the germplasm collection and explained why results of a univariate analysis of variance did not reveal significant differences among groups of accessions collected in Northern, Central and Southern Italy. The multivariate approach seemed to point out a problem of genetic erosion of the local germplasm in the Po Valley (Northern Italy) and, on the whole, appeared to be a valid system for tall fescue germplasm evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akoroda M.O., 1983. Principal component analysis and metroglyph of variation among nigerian yellow yams. Euphytica 32: 565–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckner R.C., B.P.Jerrell & R.V.Frakes, 1979. Historical development. In: Buckner R.C. and L.P.Bush (Eds.), Tall Fescue. Agronomy no 20, ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton G.W. & E.H.DeVane, 1953. Clonal evaluation in Tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) from replicated clonal material. Agron J 45: 478–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busey P., T.K.Broschat & B.J.Center, 1982. Classification of St. Augustingrass. Crop Sci 22: 469–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camussi A., 1979. Numerical taxonomy of italian populations of maize based on quantitative traits. Maydica XXIV: 161–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman Major M., 1968. The races of maize: II. Use of multivariate analysis of variance to measure morphological similarity. Crop Sci 8: 693–698.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, D.J., J. Lewis & E.W., 1966. The problem of breeding for improved seed yield in grasses. Proc. of the X Int. Grassl. Cong. 7–16 July 1966, Helsinki: 749–754.

  • Hartley, W. & G.L. Williams, 1956. Center of distribution of cultivated pasture grasses. Proc. 7th Intnl. Grassld. Congr., New Zealand: 190–199.

  • Hawkes, J.G., 1980. Crop genetic resources field collection manual. IBPGR and Eucarpia: pp. 37.

  • Hill, M.J. & A.C. Kirby, 1985. Morphological variation in prairie grass. Proc. 15th Intnl. Grassl. Congr., Japan, Voluntary Session 1 (interim issue): 1-P-10.

  • Lorenzetti F., 1978. Il contributo del miglioramento genetico alla valorizzazione dei terreni marginali. Genet Agr 32: 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzetti F. & M.Falcinelli, 1976. Valutazione di specie e varietà e direttive per il miglioramento genetico delle graminacee foraggere per i pascoli asciutti dell'Italia centrale. Riv di Agron 10: 94–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, K. & M. Ochi, 1985. Fall panicum (Panicum dichotomiflorum Michx.) in Japan. Proc. 15th Intnl. Grassl. Congr., Japan, Voluntary Session 1 (interim issue): 1-0-7.

  • Ottaviano E., T.Schiva & M.Sari Gorla, 1974. Analisi multivariata per 1o studio delle differenze genetiche in popolazioni di Gerbera jamesonii. Genet Agr 28: 292–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porceddu E., 1976. Variation for agronomical traits in a world collection of durum wheat. Z. Pflanzenzüchtg 77: 314–329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao G.V.S. & R.S.Paroda, 1982. Factor analysis in cluster-bean (Cyonomopsis tetragonoloba (L.) Taub.). Theor Appl Genet 62: 273–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaaf H.M., 1968. Phenotypic selection in Crested Wheatgrass. Crop Sci 8: 642–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiler G.J. & R.E.Stafford, 1985. Factor analysis of components of yield in guar. Crop Sci 25: 905–908.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sneath P.H.A. & R.R.Sokal, 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco: pp. 573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal R.R. & F.J.Rohlf, 1981. Biometry, 2nd Ed. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco: pp. 859.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spagnoletti Zeuli P.L., C.DePace & E.Porceddu, 1984. Variation in durum wheat populations from three geographical origins. I. Material and spike characteristics. Euphytica 33: 563–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talamucci P., 1981. Graminacee da prato. In: Baldoni R. and L.Giardini (Eds.), Coltivazioni erbacee. Patron, Bologna, Italy: 915–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talamucci P. & G.Pazzi, 1980. Prime esperienze sulla raccolta in successione di graminacee foraggere nelle aree marginali del Mugello (FI) e dell'alta Val di Taro (PR). Proc. La problematica delle Terre Marginali, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Roma, June 26, 1978, Vol. I: 53–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrell E.E., 1979. Taxonomy, morphology, and phylogeny. In: Buckner R.C. and L.P.Bush (Eds.), Tall Fescue. Agronomy no 20, ASA, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton P.D., 1972. Factor analysis of yield in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Crop Sci 12: 731–733.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by C.N.R., Italy, special grant I.P.R.A., Subject 1.5.1., paper n. 1146.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veronesi, F., Falcinelli, M. Evaluation of an Italian germplasm collection of Festuca arundinacea Schreb. through a multivariate analysis. Euphytica 38, 211–220 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023523

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00023523

Key words

Navigation