Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 92, Issue 1–2, pp 1–11 | Cite as

Genetic basis of the evolution of adaptedness in plants

  • R. W. Allard
Genetic Basis of Adaptation

Summary

Adaptedness is both complexly inherited and much affected by environment: consequently the genetic mechanisms that have led to improvements in adaptedness have been difficult to identify and to quantify. Recently it has been shown that ‘marker assisted dissection’ of adaptedness based on changes in the frequencies of discretely inherited alleles of loci of various kinds (e.g. allozyme, restriction fragment, microsatellite loci) is practicable. I will illustrate marker assisted analysis of the genetic basis of adaptedness with a sample of allozyme data from three species groups, two heavily selfing groups (two wild Avena species and barley) and one outcrossing species (corn, maize). The results lead to three main conclusions: (1) that the single most important genetic mechanism in all three species groups was the assembly of favorable epistatic combinations of alleles of different loci by means of recurring cycles of selection, intercrossing superior selects, and inbreeding to near homozygosity leading to stable superior multilocus genotypes adapted to specific habitats; (2) that exploitation of favorable interactions among alleles of the same locus played a significant role in tetraploid A. barbata and probably also in single-cross maize hybrids; (3) that purifying selection (elimination of deleterious alleles) played a small role in all three species groups. These results indicate that marker alleles provide applied breeders with effective ways to identify, track, and incorporate regions of chromosomes with favorable effects of adaptedness into improved cultivars.

Key words

adaptedness epistasis marker assisted dissection overdominance purifying selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allard R.W., 1975. The mating system and microevolution. Genetics 79: 115–126.Google Scholar
  2. Allard R.W., 1988. Genetic changes associated with the evolution of adaptedness in cultivated plants and their wild progenitors. Jour Hered 79: 225–238.Google Scholar
  3. Allard R.W., 1990. The genetics of host-pathogen coevolution: Implications for genetic resource conservation. Jour Hered 81: 1–6.Google Scholar
  4. Allard R.W., P. García, L.E. Sáenzde Miera & M. Pérezde la Vega, 1993. Evolution of multilocus genetic structure in Avena hirtula and Avena barbata. Genetics 135: 1125–1139.Google Scholar
  5. Clegg M.T. & R.W. Allard, 1972. Patterms of genetic differentiation in the slender wild oat species Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 69: 1820–1824.Google Scholar
  6. Cluster P.D. & R.W. Allard, 1995. Evolution of ribosomal (DNA) genetic structure in colonial Californian populations of Avena barbata. Genetics 139: 941–954.Google Scholar
  7. Doebley J.F., M.M. Goodman & C.W. Stuber, 1985. Isozyme variation in the races of corn from Mexico. Amer J Bot 72: 629–639.Google Scholar
  8. García P., M.I. Morris, L.E. Sáenzde Miera, R.W. Allard, M. Pérezde la Vega & G. Ladizinsky, 1991. Genetic diversity and adaptedness in tetraploid Avena barbata and its diploid ancestors A. hirtula and A. wiestii. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 1207–1211.Google Scholar
  9. Goodman M.M. & C.W. Stuber, 1980. Genetic identification of lines and crosses using isoenzyme electrophoresis. Annual Corn Sorghum Res Conf Proc 35: 10–31.Google Scholar
  10. Hutchinson E.S., S.C. Price, A.L. Kahler, M.I. Morris & R.W. Allard, 1983. An experimental verification of segregation theory in a diploidized tetraploid: esterase loci in Avena barbata. J Heredity 74: 381–383.Google Scholar
  11. Pérezde la Vega M., P. García & R.W. Allard, 1991. Multilocus genetic structure of ancestral Spanish and colonial Californian populations of Avena barbata. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 1201–1206.Google Scholar
  12. Saghai Maroof M.A., R.M. Biyashev, G.P. Yang, Q. Zhang & R.W. Allard, 1994. Extraordinarily polymorphic microsatellite DNA in barley: Species diversity, chromosomal locations and population dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 5466–5470.Google Scholar
  13. Schwartz D., 1960. Genetic studies of mutant isozymes in maize. Synthesis of hybrid enzymes by heterozygotes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 88: 1202–1206.Google Scholar
  14. Turesson G., 1922. The genotypical response of plant species to the habitat. Hereditas 3: 211–211; 331–348.Google Scholar
  15. Wright S., 1937. The distribution of gene frequencies in populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 23: 307–320.Google Scholar
  16. Zhang Q., B.Z. Shen, X.K. Dai, M.H. Mei, M.A. Saghai Maroof & Z.B. Li, 1994. Using bulked extremes and recessive class to map genes for photoperiod-sensitive genic male sterility in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 8675–8679.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. W. Allard
    • 1
  1. 1.University of California at DavisDavisU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations