Advertisement

Euphytica

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 787–800 | Cite as

Selection for yield in Lolium perenne. II. performance of spaced plant selections under competitive conditions

  • M. D. Hayward
  • J. L. Vivero
Article

Summary

The performance of six lines of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) which had been selected for three generations for production under spaced plant conditions were assessed under increasing levels of competition, namely spaced plants, drills, miniplots and large sown plots. Successful selection for yield under spaced plant conditions was not accompanied by comparable production patterns in the alternative managements. The extreme situation occurred in swards where a significant decline in production was encountered. Negative or no relationships were found in the establishment year between spaced plant production and yield in the alternative conditions whereas in the first harvest year positive correlations occurred between spaced plants, drills and miniplots and only the latter with plots. These varying patterns of performance are considered in relation to the prediction of sward behaviour and the appropriate environment for selection.

Index words

Lolium perenne perennial ryegrass selection yield evaluation competitive conditions 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Breese E. L., 1969. The measurement and significance of genotype × environment interaction in grasses. Heredity 24: 27–44.Google Scholar
  2. Eberhart S. A. & W. A. Russell, 1966. Stability parameters for comparing varieties. Crop Sci. 6: 36–40.Google Scholar
  3. England F., 1967. Non-sward densities for the assessment of yield in Italian ryegrass. I. Comparison between sward and non-sward densities. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 84: 153–158.Google Scholar
  4. Finlay L. W. & G. W. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. agric. Res. 14: 742–754.Google Scholar
  5. Hayward M. D., 1975. Variation, selection and the construction of new varieties of forage grasses. Proc. 23rd Grass Breeders Work Planning Conference Publ. Univ. of Minnesota. St. Paul 1975, pp. 7–24.Google Scholar
  6. Hayward M. D., 1983. Selection for yield in Lolium perenne. I. Selection and performance under spaced plant conditions. Euphytica 32: 85–95.Google Scholar
  7. Hayward M. D. & T. Lawrence, 1970. The genetic control of variation in a selected population of Lolium perenne. Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 12: 806–815.Google Scholar
  8. Hill J., 1975. Genotype-environment interactions-a challenge for plant breeding. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 85: 477–493.Google Scholar
  9. Jenkin T. J., 1931. Method and techniques of selection, breeding and strain building in grasses. Bull. Imp. Bur. Pl. Genet. 3: 1–34.Google Scholar
  10. Jinks J. L. & V. Connolly, 1975. Determination of the environmental sensitivity of selection lines by the selection environment. Heredity 34: 401–406.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Jinks J. L., N. E. M. Jayasekara & H. Boughey, 1977. Joint selection for both extremes of mean performance and sensitivity to a macro-environmental variable. II. Single seed descent. Heredity 39: 345–355.Google Scholar
  12. Jinks J. L. & H. S. Pooni, 1982. Determination of the environmental sensitivity of selection lines of Nicotiana rustica by the selection environment. Heredity 49: 291–294.Google Scholar
  13. Lazenby A., 1957. The problem of assessing strains. A study in grass breeding techniques. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 48: 294–304.Google Scholar
  14. Lazenby A. & H. H. Rogers, 1962. Selection criteria in grass breeding. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 59: 51–52.Google Scholar
  15. Lazenby A. & H. H. Rogers, 1964. Selection criteria in grass breeding. II. Effect on Lolium perenne of differences in population density, variety and available moisture. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 62: 285–298.Google Scholar
  16. Lazenby A. & H. H. Rogers, 1965. Selection criteria in grass breeding. III. Performance of Lolium perenne genotypes grown at different nitrogen levels and spacings. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 65: 79–89.Google Scholar
  17. Mather K., 1960. Statistical analysis in biology. 5th Ed. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  18. Perkins J. M. & J- L- Jinks, 1968. Environmental and genotype-environmental components of variability. III. Multiple lines and crosses. Heredity 23: 339–356.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Samuel C. J. A., J. Hill, E. L. Breese & Alison Davies, 1970. Assessing and predicting environmental response in Lolium perenne. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 75: 1–9.Google Scholar
  20. Sedcole J. R. & R. J. Clements, 1973. Studies on genotype × spacing interactions for herbage yield using a modified diallel analysis. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 80: 97–104.Google Scholar
  21. Van Dijk, G. E., 1980. Breeding Lolium perenne L. for yield and persistence under heavy nitrogen and infrequent cutting. In: Breeding for stress conditions. Report of Eucarpia Fodder Crops Section Meeting, Perugia, Italy 1979, pp. 131–135.Google Scholar
  22. Wright, C. E. & M. A. do Valle Ribeiro, 1973. The interaction of genotype with plant density and its implications in the assessment of material for breeding perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne). In: Evaluation of breeding material in herbage crops. Report of Eucarpia Fodder Crops Section Meeting, Dublin 1972, pp. 7–31.Google Scholar
  23. Yates F. & W. G. Cochran, 1938. The analysis of groups of experiments. J. agric. Sci., Camb. 28: 556–580.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. H. Veenman en Zonen B.V 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. D. Hayward
    • 1
  • J. L. Vivero
    • 1
  1. 1.Welsh Plant Breeding StationAberystwythWales, UK

Personalised recommendations