Euphytica

, Volume 33, Issue 2, pp 401–410 | Cite as

The potential for breeding an improved lucerne-rhizobium symbiosis. 1. Assessment of genetic variation

  • L. R. Mytton
  • J. Brockwell
  • A. H. Gibson
Article

Summary

Six cultivars of lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) were grown in all possible combinations with eight strains of Rhizobium meliloti in order to assess genetic variation in symbiotic nitrogen fixation. Host genotype and Rhizobium genotype effects on nitrogen fixation were respectively 4.8% and 21.0% of total phenotypic variance. Genetic variation due to host cultivar × Rhizobium strain interactions accounted for a further 6.0% of phenotypic variance. The results indicated low heritability of general symbiotic effectiveness in the host with interaction effects being large enough to suggest that plant performance may be unpredictable with populations of R. meliloti in field soils. Joint regression analysis showed that about 50% of the interactive variation could be explained by generalized differences in the sensitivity of cultivars to alterations in the genotype of Rhizobium strains. One cultivar, Siriver, was relatively insentitive to changes in the Rhizobium genotype whilst still maintaining high average yield. The implications of the results for lucerne breeding are discussed.

Index words

Medicago sativa lucerne alfalfa Rhizobium meliloti nitrogen fixation symbiotic effectiveness genetic variation phenotypic variation heritability lucerne breeding 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnard C., 1969. Herbage plant species. CSIRO, Canberra. p. 86–87.Google Scholar
  2. Barnard C., 1972. Register of Australian herbage plant cultivars. CSIRO, Melbourne. p. 184–185, 191–192.Google Scholar
  3. Brockwell J., 1981. Can inoculant strains ever compete successfully with established soil populations? In: A. H. Gibson & W. E. Newton (Eds), Current perspectives in nitrogen fixation. Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Nitrogen Fixation (Canberra) Aust. Acad. Sci., Canberra. p. 277Google Scholar
  4. Brockwell J. & F. W. Hely, 1966. Symbiotic characteristics of Rhizobium meliloti: an appraisal of the systematic treatment of nodulation and nitrogen fixation interactions between hosts and rhizobia of diverse origins. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 17: 885–899.Google Scholar
  5. Breese E. L., 1969. The measurement and significance of genotype-environment interactions in grasses. Heredity 31: 181–200.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, J. P., 1975. The control of photosynthetic production in terrestrial systems. In: J. P. Cooper (Ed.). Photosynthesis and productivity in different environments. IBP Vol. 3., pp. 593–621, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Date R. A., 1969. A decade of legume inoculant quality control in Australia. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 35: 27–37.Google Scholar
  8. Dudman W. F. & J. Brockwell, 1968. Ecological studies of root-nodule bacteria introduced into field environments. I. A survey of field performance of clover inoculants by gel immune diffusion serology. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 19: 739–747.Google Scholar
  9. Duhigg P., B. Melton & A. Baltensperger, 1978. Selection for acetylene reduction rates in ‘Mesilla’ alfalfa. Crop Sci. 18: 813–816.Google Scholar
  10. Finlay K. W. & G. N. Wilkinson, 1963. The analysis of adaptation in a plant breeding programme. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 14: 742–754.Google Scholar
  11. Gobson A. H., 1962. Genetic variation in the effectiveness of nodulation of lucerne varieties. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 13: 388–399.Google Scholar
  12. Gibson A. H., 1980. Methods for legumes in glasshouses and controlled environment cabinets. In: F. J. Bergersen (Ed.), Methods for evaluating biological nitrogen fixation. Wiley, Chichester and New York. p. 139–184.Google Scholar
  13. Hagedorn D. & B. A. Caldwell, 1981. Characterization of diverse Rhizobium trifolii isolates. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45: 513–516.Google Scholar
  14. Hartley W., 1979. A checklist of economic plants in Australia. CSIRO, Melbourne. p. 65.Google Scholar
  15. Heinrichs D. H., 1964. Developing creeping rooted alfalfa for pastures. Can. J. Agric. Sci. 34: 269–280.Google Scholar
  16. Ireland J. A. & J. M. Vincent, 1968. A quantitative study of competition for nodule formation. Trans. 9th Int. Congr. Soil Sci. Soc. (Adelaide). Vol 2, p. 85–93.Google Scholar
  17. Lehman, W. F., M. W. Nielson, V. L. Marble & E. H. Stanford, 1977. CUF101, a new variety of alfalfa is resistant to the blue alfalfa aphid. Calif. Agric. August 1977: 4–5.Google Scholar
  18. Oram R. N., 1981. Register of Australian herbage plant cultivars. J. Aust. Inst. Agric. Sci. 46: 200–203.Google Scholar
  19. Mytton L. R., 1975. Plant genotype × Rhizobiom strain interaction in white clover. Ann. Appl. Biol. 80: 103–107.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Mytton L. R., 1978. Some problems and potentialities in breeding for improved white clover-Rhizobium (Trifolium repens-Rhizobium trifolii) symbiosis. Ann. Appl. Biol. 88: 445–447.Google Scholar
  21. Mytton L. R., M. H. El-Sherbeeny & D. A. Lawes, 1977. Symbiotic variability in Vicia faba. 3. Genetic effects of host plant, Rhizobium strain and of host × strain interaction. Euphytica 26: 785–791.Google Scholar
  22. Snedecor G. W. & W. G. Cochran, 1967. Statistical methods, 6th ed. Iowa State U. Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  23. Tan Geok-Yong, 1981. Genetic variation for acetylene reduction rate and other characters in alfalfa. Crop Sci. 21: 485–488.Google Scholar
  24. Viands, D. R., D. K. Barnes & G. H. Heichel, 1981. Nitrogen fixation in alfalfa-responses to bidirectional selection for associated characteristics. U.S. Dep. Agric., Agric. Res. Serv., Tech. Bull. No. 1643.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Veenman B.V., Wageningen 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • L. R. Mytton
    • 1
  • J. Brockwell
    • 1
  • A. H. Gibson
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Plant IndustryCSIROCanberraAustralia
  2. 2.Welsh Plant Breeding StationAberystwythWales

Personalised recommendations