Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 109–118

Restriction fragment polymorphisms as probes for plant diversity and their development as tools for applied plant breeding

  • Tim Helentjaris
  • Gretchen King
  • Mary Slocum
  • Chris Siedenstrang
  • Sharon Wegman
Article

Summary

Maize and tomato cDNA clones have been hybridized in Southern blotting experiments to plant genomic DNA prepared from different lines to detect restriction fragment polymorphisms (RFPs). In maize we have found that a high degree of genetic variability is present, even among domestic inbred lines. Most randomly chosen maize cDNA clones can be used to detect elements of this variability. Similar levels of polymorphism are observed when genomic DNA is digested with any of a number of different restriction enzymes and probed with individual clones. When a clone is hybridized to genomic DNAs prepared from several different maize lines, a number of different alleles are often detected at a single locus. At the same time one clone can often detect more than one independently segregating locus by cross hybridization to related sequences at other loci. As expected these markers are inherited as simple codominant Mendelian alleles from one generation to the next and colinkage of these markers can be demonstrated in the progeny from a heterozygous parent. In similar studies with tomato, remarkably different results were found. Few RFPs were demonstrable among domestic Lycopersicon esculentum lines although a higher level of variability could be detected when comparing esculentum with its wild Lycopersicon relatives. These results are discussed in relation to the applied uses of RFPs in plant breeding as well as the inherent variability of different plant genomes.

Keywords

restriction fragment polymorphism plant genomic variability maize tomato 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aviv H, Leder P: Purification of biologically active globin messenger RNA by chromotography on oligothymidylic acid cellulose. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 69: 1408–1412 1972.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barker D, Schafer M, White R: Restriction sites containing CpG show a higher frequency of polymorphism in human DNA. Cell 36: 131–138, 1984.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Birnboim HC: A rapid alkaline extraction method for the isolation of plasmid DNA. In: Wu R, Grossman L, Moldave K (eds) Methods in enzymology, Vol. 100. Recombinant DNA Part B. Academic Press, New York, 1983, pp 243–255.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beckman JS, Soller M: Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in genetic improvement: methodologies, mapping and costs. Theor Appl Genet 67: 35–43, 1983.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burr B, Evola E, Burr FA, Bechman JS: The application of restriction fragment length polymorphism to plant breeding. In: Setlow JK, Hollaender A (eds) Genetic engineering principles and methods. Plenum Press, New York and London, 1983, Vol. 5, pp 45–59.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Botstein D, White R, Skolnick M, Davis RW: Construction of a genetic linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum Genet 32: 314–331, 1980.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dagert M, Ehrlich SD: Prolonged incubation in calcium chloride improves the competence of Eschericia coli cells. Gene 6: 23–28, 1979.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dellaporta SL, Wood J, Hicks JB: A plant DNA minipreparation: version II. Pl Mol Biol Rep 1: 19–21, 1983.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gergen JP, Stern RH, Wensink PC: Filter replicas and permanent collections of recombinant DNA plasmids. Nucl Acids Res 7: 2115–2136, 1979.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg RB, Galau GA, Britton RJ, Davidson EH: Nonrepetitive DNA sequence representation in sea urchin messenger RNA. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 70: 3516–3520, 1973.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gruenbaum Y, Naveh-Many T, Cedar H, Razin A: Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plant DNA. Nature 292: 860–862, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gubler U, Hoffman BJ: A simple and very efficient method for generating cDNA libraries. Gene 25: 263–269, 1983.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gusella JF, Wexler NS, Conneally PM, Naylor SL, Anderson MA, Tanzi RE, Watkins PC, Ottina K, Wallace MR, Sakaguichi AY, Young AB, Shoulson I, Bonilla E, Martin JB: A polymorhic DNA marker genetically linked to Huntington's disease. Nature 306: 234–238, 1983.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Helentjaris T, Gesteland R: Evaluation of random cDNA clones as probes for human restriction fragment polymorphisms. J Mol Appl Genet 2: 237–247, 1983.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holmes D, Quigley M: A rapid boiling method for the preparation of bacterial plasmids. Anal Biochem 114: 193–197, 1981.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Little P, Annison G, Darling S, Williamson R, Cambar T, Model B: Model for antenatal diagnosis of B-thalassemia and other monogenic disorders by molecular analysis of linked DNA polymorphisms. Nature 285: 144–147, 1980.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Maas R: An improved colony hybridization with significantly increased sensitivity for detection of single genes. Plasmid 10: 296–298, 1983.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Martin C, Northcote DH: Qualitative and quantitative changes in mRNA of castor beans during the initial stages of germination. Planta 151: 197–198, 1981.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Minty AJ, Caravatti M, Robert B, Cohen A, Daubas P, Weydert A, Gros F, Buckingham ME: Mouse actin messenger RNAs, construction and characterization of a recombinant plasmid molecule containing a complementary DNA transcript of mouse a-actin mRNA. J Biol Chem 256: 1008–1014, 1981.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Phillips J, Panny S, Kazazian H, Bochun C, Scott C, Smith R, Prenatal diagnosis of sickle cell anemia by restriction endoclease analysis: Hind111 polymorphisms in v-globin genes extend applicability. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 77: 2853–2856, 1980.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rhoades MM: Duplicate genes in maize. Amer Nat 85: 105–110, 1951.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Rivin CJ, Zimmer EA, Cullis CA, Walbot V, Huynh T, Davis RW: Evaluation of genomic variability at the nucleic acid level. Pl Mol Biol Rep 1:9–16, 1983.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saghai-Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen R, Allard RW: Ribosomal DNA spacer length polymorphism in barley: Mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Submitted Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soller M, Beckman JS: Genetic polymorphism in varietal identification and genetic improvement. Theor Appl Genet 67:25–33, 1983.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Southern EM: Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. J Mol Biol 98:503–517, 1975.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tanksley S: Molecular markers in plant breeding. Pl Mol Biol Rep 1:3–8, 1983.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Tanksley SD, Orton TJ (eds): Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding 1B. Elsevier, New York, 1983.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vieira J, Messing J: The pUC plasmids, an M13mp7-derived system for insertion mutagenesis and sequencing with synthetic universal primers. Gene 19:259–268, 1982.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Helentjaris
    • 1
  • Gretchen King
    • 1
  • Mary Slocum
    • 1
  • Chris Siedenstrang
    • 1
  • Sharon Wegman
    • 1
  1. 1.NPISalt Lake CityU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations