Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 30, Issue 6, pp 1099–1113 | Cite as

High-resolution mapping of repetitive DNA by in situ hybridization: molecular and chromosomal features of prominent dispersed and discretely localized DNA families from the wild beet species Beta procumbens

  • T. Schmidt
  • J. S. Heslop-Harrison
Research Article


Members of three prominent DNA families of Beta procumbens have been isolated as Sau3A repeats. Two families consisting of repeats of about 158 bp and 312 bp are organized as satellite DNAs (Sau3A satellites I and II), whereas the third family with a repeat length of 202 bp is interspersed throughout the genome. Multi-colour fluorescence in situ hybridization was used for physical mapping of the DNA families, and has shown that these tandemly organized families occur in large heterochromatic and DAPI positive blocks. The Sau3A satellite I hybridized exclusively around or near the centromeres of 10, 11 or 12 chromosomes. The Sau3A satellite family I showed high intraspecific variability and high-resolution physical mapping was performed on pachytene chromosomes using differentially labelled repeats. The physical order of satellite subfamily arrays along a chromosome was visualized and provided evidence that large arrays of plant satellite repeats are not contiguous and consist of distinct subfamily domains. Re-hybridization of a heterologous rRNA probe to mitotic metaphase chromosomes revealed that the 18S-5.8S-25S rRNA genes are located at subterminal position on one chromosome pair missing repeat clusters of the Sau3A satellite family I. It is known that arrays of Sau3A satellite I repeats are tightly linked to a nematode (Heterodera schachtii) resistance gene and our results show that the gene might be located close to the centromere. Large arrays of the Sau3A satellite II were found in centromeric regions of 16 chromosomes and, in addition, a considerable interspersion of repeats over all chromosomes was observed. The family of interspersed 202 bp repeats is uniformly distributed over all chromosomes and largely excluded from the rRNA gene cluster but shows local amplification in some regions. Southern hybridization has shown that all three families are specific for genomes of the section Procumbentes of the genus Beta.

Key words

Beta procumbens Beta vulgaris in situ hybridization repetitive DNA satellite DNA 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Albini SM, Schwarzacher T: In situ localization of two repetitive DNA sequences to surface-spread pachytene chromosomes of rye. Genome 35: 551–559 (1992).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anamthawat-Jonsson K, Heslop-Harrison JS: Isolation and characterization of genome-specific DNA sequences in Triticeae species. Mol Gen Genet 240: 151–158 (1993).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Antonacci R, Rocchi M, Archidiacono N, Bandini A: Ordered mapping of three alpha satellite DNA subsets on human chromosome 22. Chrom Res 3: 124–127 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. Nuclear DNA content of some important plant species. Plant Mol Biol Rep 9: 208–218 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bennetzen JL, Schrick K, Springer PS, Brown WE, San-Miguel P. Active maize genes are unmodified and flanked by diverse classes of modified, highly repetitive DNA. Genome 37: 565–576 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brandes A, Jung C, Wricke G: Nematode resistance derived from wild beet and its meiotic stability in sugar beet. Plant Breed 99: 56–64 (1987).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Charlesworth B, Sniegowski P, Stephan W: The evolutionary dynamics of repetitive DNA in eukaryotes. Nature 370: 215–220 (1994).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choo KH, Vissel B, Nagy A, Earle E, Kalitsis P: A survey of the genomic distribution of alpha satellite DNA on all the human chromosomes, and a derivation of a new consensus sequence. Nucl Acids Res 19: 1179–1182 (1991).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Jong H: Investigation into chromosome morphology of sugar beet and related wild species. Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam (1981).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    de Jong JH, Speckmann GJ, de Bock TSM, Lange W, van Voorst A: Alien chromosome fragments conditioning resistance to beet cyst nematode in diploid descendants from monosomic additions of Beta procumbens to B. vulgaris. Can J Genet Cytol 28: 439–443 (1986).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Flavell RB, Bennet MD, Smith JB: Genome size and the proportion of repeated nucleotide sequence DNA in plants. Biochem Genet 12: 257–269 (1974).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ganal MW, Broun P, Tanksley SD: Genetic mapping of tandemly repeated telomeric DNA sequences in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Genomics 14: 444–448 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ganal MW, Lapitan NLV, Tanksley SD: A molecular and cytogenetic survey of major repeated DNA sequences in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Mol Gen Genet 213: 262–268 (1988).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gerlach WL, Bedbrook JR: Cloning and characterization of ribosomal RNA genes from wheat and barley. Nucl Acids Res 7: 1869–1885 (1979).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grellet F, Delcasso F, Panabieres F, Delseny M: Organization and evolution of a higher plant alphoid-like satellite DNA sequence. J Mol Biol 187: 495–507 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gruenbaum Y, Naveh-Many T, Cedar T, Razin A: Sequence specificity of methylation in higher plants. Nature 292: 860–862 (1981).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gupta V, Jagannathan V, Lakshmikumaran MS: A novel AT-rich tandem repeat in Brassica nigra. Plant Sci 68: 233–229 (1990).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hallden C, Bryngelsson T, Säll T, Gustafsson M: Distribution and evolution of a tandemly repeated DNA sequence in the family Brassicaceae. J Mol Evol 25: 318–323 (1987).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Harrison GE, Heslop-Harrison JS: Centromeric repetitive DNA sequences in the genus Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 90: 157–165 (1995).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Heijbroek W, Roelands AJ, de Jong JH, van Hulst C, Schoone AH, Munning RG: Sugar beets homozygous for resistance to beet cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii Schm.) developed from monosomic additions of Beta procumbens to B. vulgaris. Euphytica 38: 121–131 (1988).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hueros G, Loarce Y, Ferrer E: A structural and evolutionary analysis of a dispersed repetitive sequence. Plant Mol Biol 22: 635–643 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hutchinson J, Londsdale DM: The chromosomal distribution of cloned highly repetitive sequences from hexaploid wheat. Heredity 48: 371–376 (1982).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ingham LD, Hannah WW, Baier JW, Hannah LC: Origin of the main class of repetitive DNA in selected Pennisetum species. Mol Gen Genet 238: 350–356 (1993).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Iwabuchi M, Itoh K, Shimamoto K: Molecular and cytological characterization of repetitive DNA sequences in Brassica. Theor Appl Genet 81: 349–355 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jung C, Herrmann RG: A DNA probe for rapid screening of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) carrying extra chromosomes from wild beets of the Procumbentes section. Plant Breed 107: 275–279 (1991).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jung C, Kleine M, Fischer F, Herrmann RG: Analysis of DNA from a Beta procumbens chromosome fragment in sugar beet carrying a gene for nematode resistance. Theor Appl Genet 79: 663–672 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jung C, Koch R, Fischer F, Brandes A, Wricke G, Herrmann RG: DNA markers closely linked to nematode resistances genes in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) mapped using chromosome additions and translocations originating from wild beets of the Procumbentes section. Mol Gen Genet 232: 271–278 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jung C, Wricke G: Selection of diploid nematode-resistant sugar beet from monosomic addition lines. Plant Breed 98: 205–214 (1987).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jung C: Breeding for nematode resistance in sugar beet. Ann Biol 3: 15–25 (1987).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kamm A, Galasso I, Schmidt T, Heslop-Harrison JS: Analysis of a repetitive DNA family from Arabidopsis arenosa and relationship between Arabidopsis species. Plant Mol Biol 27: 853–862 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kamm A, Schmidt T, Heslop-Harrison JS: Molecular and physical organization of highly repetitive, undermethylated DNA from Pennisetum glaucum. Mol Gen Genet 244: 420–425 (1994).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kleine M, Cai D, Elbl C, Herrmann RG, Jung C: Physical mapping and cloning of a translocation in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) carrying a gene for nematode (Heterodera schachtii) resistance from B. procumbens. Theor Appl Genet 90: 399–406 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Klein-Lankhorst RM, Salentijn EMJ, Dirkse WG, Arens-de Reuver M, Stiekema WJ: Construction of a YAC library from a Beta vulgaris fragment addition and isolation of a major satellite DNA cluster linked to the beet cyst nematode resistance locusHsl pat-1. Theor Appl Genet 89: 426–434 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lapitan NLV, Ganal MW, Tanksley SD: Somatic karyo-type of tomato based on in situ hybridization of the TGRI satellite repeat. Genome 32: 992–998 (1989).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lapitan NLV: Organization and evolution of higher plant nuclear genomes. Genome 35: 171–181 (1991).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Levinson G, Gutman GA: Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol Biol Evol 4: 203–221 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lohe AR, Hilliker AJ, Roberts PA: Mapping simple repeated DNA sequences in heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 134: 1149–1174 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Löptien H: Breeding nematode-resistant beets. I. Development of resistant alien additions by crosses between Beta vulgaris L. and wild species of the section Patellaris. Z Pflanzenzüchtg 92: 208–220 (1984).Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Maluszynska J, Heslop-Harrison JS: Localization of tandemly repeated DNA sequences in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J 1: 159–166 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    McIntyre CL, Pereira S, Moran LB, Appels R: New Secale cereale (rye) DNA derivatives for the detection of rye chromosome segments in wheat. Genome 33: 635–640 (1990).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Meinkoth J, Wahl G: Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid support. Anal Biochem 138: 267–284 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nakamura C, Tsuchiya T: Nematode resistance and meiotic abnormality in diploid sugar beet selected from interspecific Beta vulgaris×B.procumbens hybrids. Plant Breed 100: 41–53 (1988).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nelson M, Raschke E, McClelland M: Effect of sitespecific methylation on restriction endonucleases and DNA modification methyltransferases. Nucl Acids Res 21: 3139–3154 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ohtsubo H, Ohtsubo E: Involvement of transposition in dispersion of tandem repeat sequences (TrsA) in rice genomes. Mol Gen Genet 245: 449–455 (1994).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rogowsky PM, Manning S, Liu SY, Landridge P: The R173 family of rye-specific DNA sequences: a structural analysis. Genome 34: 88–95 (1991).Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Salentijn EMJ, Sandal NN, Klein-Lankhorst R, Lange W, De Bock TSM, Marcker KA, Stiekema WJ: Long-range organization of a satellite DNA family flanking the beet cyst nematode resistance locus (Hs1) on chromosome-1 of B. patellaris and B. procumbens. Theor Appl Genet 89: 459–466 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Salentijn EMJ, Sandal NN, Lange W, de Bock TSM, Krens FA, Marcker KA, Stiekema WJ: Isolation of DNA markers linked to a beet cyst nematode resistance locus in Beta patellaris and Beta procumbens. Mol Gen Genet 235: 432–440 (1992).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sambrook J, Frisch EF, Maniatis T: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1989).Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Savitzky H: Hybridization between Beta vulgaris and B. procumbens and transmission of nematode (Heterodera schachtii) resistance to sugar beet. Can J Genet Cytol 17: 197–209 (1975).Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Schmidt T, Heslop-Harrison JS: Variability and evolution of highly repeated DNA sequences of the genus Beta. Genome 36: 1074–1079 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Schmidt T, Jung C, Metzlaff M: Distribution and evolution of two satellite DNAs in the genus Beta. Theor Appl Gen 82: 793–799 (1991).Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schmidt T, Junghans H, Metzlaff M: Construction of Beta procumbens-specific DNA probes and their application for the screening of B. vulgaris×B. procumbens (2n=19) addition lines. Theor Appl Genet 79: 177–181 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schmidt T, Kubis A, Heslop-Harrison JS: Analysis and chromosomal localization of retrotransposons in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.): LINEs and Tyl-copia-like elements as major components of the genome. Chrom Res 3: 335–345 (1995).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Schmidt T, Schwarzacher T, Heslop-Harrison JS: Physical mapping of rRNA genes by fluorescent in-situ hybridization and structural analysis of 5S rRNA genes and intergenic spacer sequences in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). Theor Appl Genet 88: 629–636 (1994).Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Schweizer G, Ganal M, Ninnemann H, Hemleben V: Species-specific DNA sequences for identification of somatic hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum acaule. Theor Appl Genet 75: 679–684 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Simeons CR, Gielen J, Van Montagu M, Inze D: Characterization of highly repetitive sequences of Arabidopsis thaliana. Nucl Acids Res 16: 6753–6766 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Singer MF: Highly repeated sequences in mammalian genomes. Int Rev Cytol 76: 67–112 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Strachan T, Webb D, Dover GA: Transition stages of molecular drive in multi-copy DNA families in Drosophila. EMBO J 4: 1701–1708 (1987).Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Svitashev S, Bryngelsson T, Vershinin A, Pedersen C, Säll T, von Bothmer R: Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Hordeum using repetitive DNA sequences. Theor Appl Genet 89: 801–810 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    van Geyt JPC, Oléo M, Lange W, de Bock TSM: Monosomic additions in beet (Beta vulgaris) carrying extra chromosomes of Beta procumbens. I. Identification of the alien chromosomes with the help of isozyme markers. Theor Appl Genet 76: 577–586 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Vershinin AV, Svitashev SK, Gummesson PO, Salomon B, von Bothmer R, Bryngelsson T: Characterization of a family of tandemly repeated DNA sequences in Triticeae. Theor Appl Genet 89: 217–225 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Vongs A, Kakutani T, Martienssen RA, Richards ER: Arabidopsis thaliana methylation mutants. Science 260: 1926–1928 (1993).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Wang ZX, Kurata N, Saji S, Katayose Y, Minobe Y: A chromosome 5-specific repetitive sequence in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet 90: 907–913 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Willard HF, Waye JS: Hierachic order in chromosome-specific alpha satellite DNA. Trends Genet 3: 192–198 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Wu T, Wu R: A novel repetitive DNA sequence in the genus Oryza. Theor Appl Genet 84: 136–144 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Zhang HB, Dvorák J: Isolation of repeated DNA sequences from Lophophyrum elongatum for detection of Lophophyrum chromatin in wheat genomes. Genome 33: 283–294 (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Schmidt
    • 1
  • J. S. Heslop-Harrison
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell BiologyJohn Innes CentreNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations