Plant Molecular Biology

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 567–576 | Cite as

A second L-type isozyme of potato glucan phosphorylase: cloning, antisense inhibition and expression analysis

  • Uwe Sonnewald
  • Astrid Basner
  • Burkhard Greve
  • Martin Steup
Research Article


In potato tubers two starch phosphorylase isozymes, types L and H, have been described and are believed to be responsible for the complete starch breakdown in this tissue. Type L has been localized in amyloplasts, whereas type H is located within the cytosol. In order to investigate whether the same isozymes are also present in potato leaf tissue a cDNA expression library from potato leaves was screened using a monoclonal antibody recognizing both isozyme forms. Besides the already described tuber L-type isozyme a cDNA clone encoding a second L-type isozyme was isolated. The 3171 nucleotide long cDNA clone contains an uninterrupted open reading frame of 2922 nucleotides which encodes a polypeptide of 974 amino acids. Sequence comparison between both L-type isozymes on the amino acid level showed that the polypeptides are highly homologous to each other, reaching 81–84% identity over most parts of the polypeptide. However the regions containing the transit peptide (amino acids 1–81) and the insertion sequence (amino acids 463–570) are highly diverse, reaching identities of only 22.0% and 29.0% respectively.

Northern analysis revealed that both forms are differentially expressed. The steady-state mRNA levels of the tuber L-type isozyme accumulates strongly in potato tubers and only weakly in leaf tissues, whereas the mRNA of the leaf L-type isozyme accumulates in both tissues to the same extent. Constitutive expression of an antisense RNA specific for the leaf L-type gene resulted in a strong reduction of starch phosphorylase L-type activity in leaf tissue, but had only sparse effects in potato tuber tissues. Determination of the leaf starch content revealed that antisense repression of the starch phosphorylase activity has no significant influence on starch accumulation in leaves of transgenic potato plants. This result indicated that different L-type genes are responsible for the starch phosphorylase activity in different tissues, but the function of the different enzymes remains unclear.

Key words

antisense inhibition differential expression glucan phosphorylase type L isozymes starch breakdown transgenic plants 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Amasino RM: Acceleration of nucleic acid hybridisation rate by polyethylene glycol. Anal Biochem 152: 304–307 (1986).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bevan M: binary Agrobacterium vectors for plant transformation. Nucl Acids Res 12: 8711–8721 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bradford MM: A rapid and sensitive method for quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 243–254 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brisson N, Giroux H, Zollinger M, Camirand A, Simard C: Maturation and subcellular compartmentation of potato starch phosphorylase. Plant Cell 1: 559–566 (1989).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bullock WO, Fernandez JM, Short JM: XL-1 Blue: a high efficiency plasmid transforming recA Escherichia coli strain with beta-galactosidase selection. BioTechniques 5: 376 (1987).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Conrads J, van Berkel J, Schächtele C, Steup M: Nonchloroplast α-1,4-glucan phosphorylase from pea leaves: characterization and in-situ localization by indirect immunofluorescence. Biochim Biophys Acta 882: 452–463 (1986).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Debleare R, Bytebier B, DeGreve H, Debroek F, Schell J, Van Montagu M, Leemans J: Efficient octopine Ti plasmid-derived vectors of Agrobacterium mediated gene transfer to plants. Nucl Acids Res 13: 4777–4788 (1985).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dickinson DB, Preiss J: Presence of ADP-glucose pyrophoshorylase in shrunken-2 and brittle-2 mutants of maize endosperm. Plant Physiol 44: 1058–1062 (1969).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Franck A, Guilley H, Jonrad G, Richards K, Hirth L: Nucleotide sequence of cauliflower mosaic virus DNA. Cell 21: 285–294 (1980).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gielen J, De Beuckeleer M, Seurinck J, Debroeck H, DeGreve H, Lemmers M, Van Montagu M, Schell J: The complete nucleotide sequence of the TL-DNA of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens plasmid pTiAch5. EMBO J 3: 835–846 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Greve B: Immunochemische Analyse und submolekulare Charakterisierung pflanzlicher Heteropolymere mit Hilfe mono- und polyklonaler Antikörper. Dissertation, Universität Münster (1992).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Höfgen R, Willmitzer L: Storage of competent cells for Agrobacterium transformation. Nucl Acids Res 16: 9877 (1988).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kossmann J, Müller-Röber B, Dyer TA, Raines CA, Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L: Cloning and expression analysis of plastidic fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase coding sequence from potato: circumstantial evidence for the import of hexoses into chloroplasts. Planta 188: 7–12 (1992).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lin T-P, Caspar T, Sommerville C, Preiss J: Isolation and characterization of a starchless mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh lacking ADPglucose phosphorylase activity. Plant Physiol 86: 1131–1135 (1988).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin T-P, Caspar T, Sommerville C, Preiss J: A starch deficient mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana with low ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase activity lacks one of the two subunits of the enzyme. Plant Physiol 88: 1175–1181 (1988).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lin C-T, Yeh K-W, Lee PD, Su JC: Primary structure of sweet potato starch phosphorylase deduced from its cDNA sequence. Plant Physiol 95: 1250–1253 (1991).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Logemann J, Schell J, Willmitzer L: Improved method for the isolation of RNA from plant tissues. Anal Biochem 163: 21–26 (1987).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY (1982).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mori H, Tanizawa K, Fukui T: Potato tuber type H phosphorylase isozyme. J Biochem 266: 18446–18453 (1991).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Müller-Röber B, Sonnewald U, Willmitzer L: Inhibition of the ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in transgenic potatoes leads to sugar-storing tubers and influences tuber formation and expression of tuber storage protein genes. EMBO J 11: 1229–1238 (1992).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Murashige T, Skoog F: A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15: 473–497 (1962).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nakano K, Mori H, Fukui T: Molecular cloning of cDNA encoding potato amyloplast α-glucan phosphorylase and the structure of its transit peptide. J Biochem (Tokyo) 106: 691–695 (1989).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Preiss J: Regulation of the biosynthesis and degradation of starch. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 33: 431–454 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Proudfoot NJ, Brownlee GG: 3′ Non-coding region sequences in eukaryotic messenger RNA. Nature 263: 211–214 (1976).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Proudfoot NJ: The end of message and beyond. Nature 307: 412–413 (1984).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Shimomura S, Nagai M, Fukui T: Comparative glucan specificities of two types of spinach leaf phosphorylase. J Biochem 91: 703–717 (1982).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rocha-Sosa M, Sonnewald U, Frommer W, Stratmann M, Schell J, Willmitzer L: Both developmental and metabolic signals activate the promoter of a class I patatin gene. EMBO J 8: 23–29 (1989).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Steup M, Latzko E: Intracellular localization of phosphorylases in spinach and pea leaves. Planta 145: 69–75 (1979).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Steup M: Starch degrading enzymes. Meth Plant Biochem 3: 103–128 (1990).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stitt M, Wirtz W, Heldt HW: Pathway of starch break-down in photosynthetic tissue of Pisum sativum. Biochim Biophys Acta 544: 200–214 (1978).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsai CY, Nelson OE: Starch deficient maize mutant lacking adenosine diphosphate glucose pyrophosphorylase activity. Science 151: 341–343 (1966).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Vervliet G, Holsters M, Teuchy H, Van Montagu M, Schell J: Characterization of different plaque-forming and defective temperate phages in Agrobacterium strains. J Gen Virol 26: 33–48 (1975).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yang Y, Steup M: Polysaccharide fraction from higher plants which strongly interacts with the cytosolic phosphorylase isozyme. Plant Physiol 94: 960–969 (1990).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Uwe Sonnewald
    • 1
  • Astrid Basner
    • 2
  • Burkhard Greve
    • 3
  • Martin Steup
    • 3
  1. 1.Institut für Pflanzengenetik und KulturpflanzenforschungGaterslebenGermany
  2. 2.Institut für Genbiologische Forschung Berlin GmbHBerlinGermany
  3. 3.Institut für Botanik der Westfälischen Wilhelms-UniversitätMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations