Hydrobiologia

, Volume 60, Issue 1, pp 3–12 | Cite as

A comparison of methods for measuring primary productivity and community respiration in streams

  • T. L. Bott
  • J. T. Brock
  • C. E. Cushing
  • S. V. Gregory
  • D. King
  • R. C. Petersen
Article

Abstract

Carbon dioxide and oxygen exchange procedures for measuring community metabolism (two open stream methods and three chamber methods) were compared on the same reach of a third-order stream. Open stream methods were complicated by high diffusion rates and yielded net community primary productivity estimates lower than those obtained with chamber methods. Chamber methods yielded variable productivity and respiration data. However, when normalized for chlorophyll a, productivity estimates from the chamber methods were within an expected range for the system. Balances of photosynthesis and respiration from the chamber methods were similar between methods and indicated that autotrophic or heterotrophic processes could dominate the system. Considerations in applying the various procedures are discussed.

Keywords

Primary productivity Community respiration Methods Streams 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Public Health Association. 1971. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 874 pp. APHA, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Copeland, B. J. & Duffer, W. R.. 1964. Use of clear plastic dome to measure gaseous diffusion rates in natural waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 9: 494–499.Google Scholar
  3. Elliott, J. M. 1971. Some methods for the statistical analysis of samples of benthic invertebrates. Publ. No. 25. Freshwater Biol. Assoc. Westmorland, 148 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Elwwod, J. W. & Nelson, D. J.. 1972. Periphyton production and grazing rates in a stream measured with 32P material balance method. Oikos 23: 295–303.Google Scholar
  5. Fisher, S. G. & Likens, G. E. 1973. Energy flow in Bear Brook, New Hampshire: an integrative approach to stream ecosystem metabolism. Ecol. Monogr. 4: 421–439.Google Scholar
  6. Flemer, D. A. 1970. Primary productivity of the north branch of the Raritan River, New Jersey. Hydrobiol. 35: 273–296.Google Scholar
  7. Hall, C. A. S. 1972. Migration and metabolism in a temperate stream ecosystem. Ecol. Monogr. 53: 585–604.Google Scholar
  8. Hansmann, E. W., Lane, C. B. & Hall, J. D. 1971. A direct method of measuring benthic primary production in streams. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 822–825.Google Scholar
  9. Hoskin, C. M. 1959. Studies of oxygen metabolism of streams of North Carolina. Publ. Inst. Mar. Sci. Texas. 6: 186–192.Google Scholar
  10. Kelly, M. G., Hornberger, G. M. & Cosby, B. J. 1974. Continuous automated measurement of rates of photosynthesis and respiration in an undisturbed river community. Limnol. Oceanogr. 19: 305–312.Google Scholar
  11. Naiman, R. J. 1976. Primary production, standing stock, and export of organic matter in a Mohave Desert thermal stream. Limnol. Oceanogr. 21: 60–73.Google Scholar
  12. Kevern, N. R. & Ball, R. C. 1965. Primary productivity and energy relationships in artificial streams. Limnol. Oceanogr. 10: 74–87.Google Scholar
  13. Lorenzen, C. J. 1967. Determination of chlorophyll and phaeo-pigments: spectrophotometric equations. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 343–346.Google Scholar
  14. Marker, A. F. 1976. The benthic algae of some streams in southern England. II. The primary productivity of the epilithon in a small chalk stream. J. Ecol. 64: 359–373.Google Scholar
  15. McDiffett, W. F., Carr, A. E. & Young, D. L. 1972. An estimate of primary productivity in a Pennsylvania trout stream using a diurnal oxygen curve technique. Amer. Midl. Nat. 87: 564–570.Google Scholar
  16. McIntire, C. D. & Phinney, H. K. 1965. Laboratory studies of periphyton production and community metabolism in lotic environments. Ecol. Monogr. 35: 237–258.Google Scholar
  17. Odum, H. T. 1956. Primary production in flowing waters. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2: 102–117.Google Scholar
  18. Owens, M. 1969. Some factors involved in the use of dissolved oxygen distributions in streams to determine productivity. p. 209–224. In: C. R. Goldman (Ed.). Primary Productivity in Aquatic Environments. Univ. Cal. Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  19. Owens, M. 1974. Measurements on non-isolated natural communities in running waters. p. 111–119. In: R. A. Vollenweider (Ed.) A manual on methods for measuring primary production in aquatic environments. IBP Handbook No. 12, Blackwell Scientific, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Pfeiffer, R. F. & McDiffett, W. F.. 1975. Some factors affecting primary productivity of stream riffle communities. Arch. Hydrobiol. 75: 306–317.Google Scholar
  21. Schindler, D. W., Frost, V. E. & Schmidt, R. V. 1973. Production of epilithiphyton in two lakes of the Experimental Lakes Area, northwestern Ontario, J. Fish. Res. Board Canada 30: 1511–1524.Google Scholar
  22. Solorzano, L. 1969. Determination of ammonia in natural waters by the phenolhypochlorite method. Limnol. Oceanogr. 14: 799–801.Google Scholar
  23. Strickland, J. D. H. & Parsons, T. R. 1972. A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fish. Res. Bd. Canada Bull. 167, second ed. 310 pp.Google Scholar
  24. Stumm, W. & Morgan, J. J. 1970. Aquatic Chemistry. An introduction emphasizing chemical equilibrium in natural waters. Chapter 4. Wiley-Interscience, New York, 583 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Thoni, H. 1967. Transformations of variables used in the analysis of experimental and observational data. A Review. Tech. Rept. No. 7, Iowa State University, Ames. 61 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Wetzel, R. G. 1975. Primary Production. pg. 230–247. In: B. A. Whitton, River Ecology, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Wolfe, E. G., Cushing, C. E. & Rabe, F. W. 1971. An automated system for multiple recording of diurnal pH. Limnol. Oceanogr. 16: 577–580.Google Scholar
  28. Wood, K. G. 1974. Carbon dioxide diffusivity across the airwater interface. Arch. Hydrobiol. 73: 57–69.Google Scholar
  29. Wright, J. C. & Mills, I. K. 1967. Productivity studies in the Madison River, Yellowstone National Park. Limnol. Oceanogr. 12: 568–577.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Dr. W. Junk b.v. Publishers 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. L. Bott
    • 1
  • J. T. Brock
    • 2
  • C. E. Cushing
    • 3
  • S. V. Gregory
    • 4
  • D. King
    • 5
  • R. C. Petersen
    • 1
  1. 1.Stroud Water Research Center of the Academy of Natural Sciences of PhiladelphiaR. AvondalePennsylvania
  2. 2.Department of BiologyIdaho State UniversityPocatelloIdaho
  3. 3.Battele-Pacific Northwest LaboratoriesRichland
  4. 4.Department of Fisheries and WildlifeOregon State UniversityCorvallis
  5. 5.Kellog Biological StationMichigan State UniversityHickory Corners

Personalised recommendations