, Volume 294, Issue 1, pp 1–4 | Cite as

Nitrogen and phosphorus uptake in seedlings of the seagrass Amphibolis antarctica in Western Australia

  • E. I. Paling
  • A. J. McComb


The uptake of nitrate, ammonium and phosphate was examined in vitro in seedlings of the seagrass Amphibolis antarctica ((Labill.) Sonder ex Aschers.). Uptake of all three nutrients was significantly correlated with external concentration up to 800 µ g l−1. The uptake of nitrate (0–200 µ g NO3-N g dry wt−1 h−1) was significantly lower than the uptake of ammonium (0–500 µ g NH4-N g dry wt−1 h−1), suggesting that the seedlings have a higher affinity for this form of nitrogen in the water column.

Data were in general agreement with uptake rates recorded for other seagrasses, notably Zostera marina. In comparison to the dominant macroalgae for the same region, seedlings had either similar or higher uptake rates in relation to external concentration, lending support to the hypothesis that seedlings, which do not possess roots, behave like macroalgae in terms of nutrient acquisition from the water column.

A comparison with literature data on adult seagrass suggests, however, that seagrasses show lower uptake rates than macroalgae suggesting that the macroalgae, which are totally reliant on the water column for nutrients, are more efficient at uptake than seagrasses which may potentially use the sediment for a nutrient source.


Nitrogen Phosphate Ammonium Nitrate Phosphorus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barko, J. W., M. S. Adams & N. L. Clesceri, 1986. Environmental factors and their consideration in the management of submersed aquatic vegetation: a review. J. Aquat. Plant Mgmt 24: 1–10.Google Scholar
  2. Brix, H. & J. E. Lyngby, 1985. Uptake and translocation of phosphorus in eelgrass (Zostera marina). Mar. Biol. 90: 111–116.Google Scholar
  3. Carignan, R., 1982. An empirical model to estimate the relative importance of roots in phosphorus uptake by aquatic macrophytes. Can. J. Fish. aquat. Sci. 39: 243–247.Google Scholar
  4. Hemminga, M. A., P. G. Harrison & F. van Lent, 1991. The balance of nutrient losses and gains in seagrass meadows. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 71: 85–96.Google Scholar
  5. Hocking, P. J., M. L. Cambridge & A. J. McComb, 1981. The nitrogen and phosphorus nutrition of developing plants of two seagrasses, Posidonia australis and Posidonia sinuosa. Aquat. Bot. 11: 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iizumi, H. & A. Hattori, 1982. Growth and organic production of eelgrass (Zostera marina L.) in temperate waters of the pacific coast of Japan. III. the kinetics of nitrogen uptake. Aquat. Bot. 12: 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Short, F. T. & C. P. McRoy, 1984. Nitrogen uptake by leaves and roots of the seagrass Zostera marina L. Bot. mar. 27: 547–555.Google Scholar
  8. Thursby, G. B. & M. M. Harlin, 1982. Leaf-root interaction in the uptake of ammonia by Zostera marina. Mar. Biol. 72: 109–112.Google Scholar
  9. Thursby, G. B. & M. M. Harlin, 1984. Interaction of leaves and roots of Ruppia maritima in the uptake of phosphate, ammonia and nitrate. Mar. Biol. 83: 61–67.Google Scholar
  10. Walker, D. I., 1985. Correlations between salinity and growth of the seagrass Amphibolis antarctica (Labill.) Sonder & Aschers., in Shark Bay, Western Australia, using a new method for measuring production rate. Aquat. Bot. 23: 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. I. Paling
    • 1
  • A. J. McComb
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Environmental ScienceMurdoch UniversityPerthWestern Australia

Personalised recommendations