Advertisement

Hydrobiologia

, Volume 213, Issue 2, pp 141–148 | Cite as

Substrate selection and seasonal variation in densities of invertebrates in stream pools of a tropical river

  • M. Arunachalam
  • K. C. Madhusoodanan Nair
  • J. Vijverberg
  • K. Kortmulder
  • H. Suriyanarayanan
Article

Abstract

Spatial distribution and seasonal variation in densities of the invertebrates were investigated for a year in three stream pools of a South Indian river. The effects of season, substrate type and water depth on the distribution were analyzed. Substrate type and season influenced the invertebrate distribution the most. Leaf packs harboured most of the organisms followed by macro-algal substrate and sand. The lowest densities were observed on rocky substrates and in the water column. Rocky substrates in shallow water supported higher densities of total invertebrates than deeper areas. Chironomid larvae dominated all benthic substrates throughout the year. Of the 19 invertebrate taxa studied, 6 showed no seasonality in densities, and most of the rest showed their highest densities in the pre-monsoon period and lowest in the SW monsoon or post-monsoon periods. However, in two of the three pools, the densities of total invertebrates were highest during the post-monsoon period with secondary peaks in the pre-monsoon period.

Key words

microdistribution seasonality invertebrate densities substrate selection stream pools tropical river 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, R. O., 1959. A modified floatation technique for sorting bottom fauna samples. Limnol. Oceanogr. 4: 223–225.Google Scholar
  2. Bilby, R. E. & G. E. Likens, 1980. Importance of organic debris in the structure and function of stream ecosystems. Ecology 61: 1107–1113.Google Scholar
  3. Bishop, J. E., 1973. Limnology of a small Malayan river Sungai Gombak. W. Junk, The Hague, 485 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Cooper, S. D., 1985. Prey preferences and interactions of predators from stream pools. Verh. int. Ver. Limnol. 22: 1858–1861.Google Scholar
  5. Dahl, P. C., 1979. A sampling technique for littoral stone dwelling organisms. Oikos 33: 106–112.Google Scholar
  6. Drake, J. A., 1984. Species aggregation: the influence of detritus in a benthic invertebrate community. Hydrobiologia 112: 109–115.Google Scholar
  7. Dudgeon, D., 1982. Aspects of the microdistribution of insect macrobenthos in a forest stream in Hong Kong. Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. 64: 221–239.Google Scholar
  8. Egglishaw, H. J., 1969. The distribution of benthic invertebrates on substrate in fast flowing streams. J. anim. Ecol. 38: 19–33.Google Scholar
  9. Frost, W. E., 1942. Liffey survey IV. The fauna of submerged ‘mosses’ in an acid and an alkaline water. Proc. Royal Irish Acad. B. 47: 239–269.Google Scholar
  10. Gabriel, K. R., 1971. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis. Biometrika 58: 453–467.Google Scholar
  11. Glime, J. M. & R. M. Clemons, 1972. Species diversity of stream insects on Fontinalis spp. compared to diversity on artificial substrates. Ecology 53: 458–464.Google Scholar
  12. Hawkins, C. P., M. L. Murphy & N. H. Anderson, 1982. Effects of canopy, substrate composition and gradient on the structure of macro invertebrate communities in Cascade range streams of Oregon. Ecology 63: 1840–1856.Google Scholar
  13. Hynes, H. B. N., 1950. The food of freshwater sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus and Pygosteus pungitius), with a review of methods used in studies of the food of fishes. J. anim. Ecol. 19: 36–58.Google Scholar
  14. Hynes, H. B. N., 1961. The invertebrate fauna of a Welsh mountain stream. Arch. Hydrobiol. 57: 344–388.Google Scholar
  15. Kott, P., 1953. Modified whirling apparatus for subsampling of plankton. Austr. J. Mar. & Freshwat. Res. 4: 387–393.Google Scholar
  16. Logan, P. & M. P. Brooker, 1983. The macro-invertebrate fauna of riffles and pools. Wat. Res. 17: 263–270.Google Scholar
  17. Minshall, G. W. & J. N. Minshall, 1977. Microdistribution of benthic invertebrates in a rocky mountain (USA) stream. Hydrobiologia 55: 231–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pisharoty, P. R., 1987. Monsoon vagaries over Kerala. In: P. Natarajan, H. Suriyanarayanan & P. K. Abdul Azis (eds), Advances in Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. Published by the University of Kerala, Trivandrum, India: 361–367.Google Scholar
  19. Platts, W. S., W. F. Megahan & G. W. Minshall, 1983. Methods for evaluating stream, riparian and biotic conditions. Inter-mountain forest and range experiment station, Ogden, USA. Technical Report. 70 pp.Google Scholar
  20. Rabeni, C. F. & G. W. Minshall, 1977. Factors affecting micro-distribution of stream benthic insects. Oikos 29: 33–43.Google Scholar
  21. Reice, S. R., 1980. The role of substratum in benthic macroinvertebrate microdistribution and litter decomposition in a woodland stream. Ecology 6: 580–590.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, R. E. W. & R. G. Pearson, 1987. The macro-invertebrate communities of intermittent stream in tropical Queensland. Hydrobiologia 150: 45–61.Google Scholar
  23. Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987a. Ordination. In: R. H. Jongman, C. J. F. Ter Braak & O. F. R. van Tongeren (eds), Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology. Wageningen, Pudoc: 91–173.Google Scholar
  24. Ter Braak, C. J. F., 1987b. CANOCO — a FORTRAN program for canonical community ordination by partial detrended canonical correspondency analysis (version 2.1). ITI — TNO, Wageningen, Netherlands, 95 pp.Google Scholar
  25. Ulfstrand, S., 1967. Microdistribution of benthic species (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Trichoptera, Diptera: Simuliidae) in Lapland streams. Oikos 18: 293–310.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Arunachalam
    • 1
  • K. C. Madhusoodanan Nair
    • 1
  • J. Vijverberg
    • 2
  • K. Kortmulder
    • 3
  • H. Suriyanarayanan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Aquatic Biology & FisheriesUniversity of KeralaTrivandrumIndia
  2. 2.Limnological InstituteTjeukemeer LaboratoryVD OosterzeeThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Zoological LaboratoryUniversity of LeidenRA LeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations