International Journal of Fracture

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 17–28 | Cite as

Process zone analysis for the single-edge notched specimen: Part II. Process zone growth and crack propagation

  • Rasko P. Ojdrovic
  • Henry J. Petroski


Process zone growth and crack propagation in the single-edge notched (SEN) specimen are studied using the relations among applied load, notional crack and process zone lengths, and crack opening displacement derived in the first part of this work [1]. Process zone growth is simulated by increasing the notional crack length while keeping the traction-free crack length constant. A model for crack propagation based on either critical crack tip opening displacement (CTOD) or critical process zone length, as criteria for traction-free crack extension is proposed. The influence of closing pressure distribution, initial traction-free crack length, and crack extension criterion on the behavior of load vs. CMOD curves is discussed. The present model can be used to model load-deformation behavior from initial loading through softening to failure of nonlinear materials, as is verified by comparing the theoretical and experimentally determined load vs. crack mouth opening (CMOD) curves for concrete beams.


Crack Extension Concrete Beam Crack Open Displacement Critical Crack Zone Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    R.P. Ojdrovic and H.J. Petroski, International Journal of Fracture 49 (1991) 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. Neimitz and E.C. Aifantis, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 26 (1987) 505–518.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Ungsuwarungsri and W.G. Knauss, Journal of Applied Mechanics 55 (1988) 52–58.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S.L. Lee and D.J. Unger, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 28 (1988) 647–660.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R.P. Ojdrovic, Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina (1988).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H.W. Reinhardt, Engineering Fracture Mechanics 22 (1985) 787–796.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. Carpinteri, A.Di Tomaso and M. Fanelli, in Fracture Toughness and Fracture Energy of Concrete, F.H. Wittmann (ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (1986) 117–135.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R.P. Ojdrovic, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 116 (1990) 1317–1331.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Y.S. Jenq and S.P. Shah, in Application of Fracture Mechanics to Cementitious Composites, S.P. Shah (ed.), Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht (1985) 319–359.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rasko P. Ojdrovic
    • 1
  • Henry J. Petroski
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations