Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 126, Issue 2, pp 237–246 | Cite as

Chemical composition of soil solutions extracted from New Zealand beech forests and West German beech and spruce forests

  • M. R. Davis
Article

Abstract

Concentrations of ions were measured in soil solutions from beech (Nothofagus) forests in remote areas of New Zealand and in solutions from beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests in North-East Bavaria, West Germany, to compare the chemistry of soil solutions which are unaffected by acid deposition (New Zealand) with those that are affected (West Germany). In New Zealand, soil solution SO42− concentrations ranged between <2 and 58 μmol L−1, and NO3 concentrations ranged between <1 and 3 μmol L−1. In West Germany, SO42− concentrations ranged between 80 and 700 μmol L−1, and NO3 concentrations at three of six sites ranged between 39 and 3750 μmol L−1, but was not detected at the remaining three sites. At all sites in New Zealand, and at sites where the soil base status was moderately high in West Germany, pH levels increased, and total Al (Alt) and inorganic monomeric Al (Ali) levels decreased rapidly with increasing soil depth. In contrast, at sites on soils of low base status in West Germany, pH levels increased only slightly, and Al levels did not decline with increasing soil depth.

Under a high-elevation Norway spruce stand showing severe Mg deficiency and dieback symptoms in West Germany, soil solution Mg2+ levels ranged between 20 and 60 μmol L, and were only half those under a healthy stand. Alt and Ali levels were substantially higher the healthy stand than under the unhealthy stand, indicating that Al toxicity was not the main cause of spruce decline.

Key words

Al3+ Ca2+ Mg2+ NH4+ NO3 SO42− Al toxicity forest dieback Fagus sylvatica Nothofagus pH Picea abies soil solution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AbrahamsenG 1984 Effects of acidic deposition on forest soil and vegetation. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 305, 369–382.Google Scholar
  2. AspH, BengtssonB and JensenP 1988 Growth and cation uptake in spruce (Picea abies Karst.) grown in sand culture with various aluminium contents. Plant and Soil 111, 127–133.Google Scholar
  3. DriscollC T 1984 A procedure for the fractionation of aqueous aluminium in dilute acidic waters. Intern. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 16, 267–283.Google Scholar
  4. GoldboldD L, DictusK and HüttermannA 1988 Influence of aluminium and nitrate on root growth and mineral nutrition of Norway spruce (Picea abies) seedlings. Can. J. For. Res. 14, 1167–1171.Google Scholar
  5. HüttlR F and WisniewskiJ 1987 Fertilisation as a tool to mitigate forest decline associated with nutrient deficiencies. Water Air Soil Pollut. 33, 65–276.Google Scholar
  6. LalandeH and HendershotW H 1986 Aluminium speciation in some synthetic systems: Comparison of the fast-oxine, pH 5.0 extraction and dialysis methods. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 43, 231–234.Google Scholar
  7. MulderJ, VanGrinsvenJ J M and VanBreemenN 1987 Impacts of acid atmospheric deposition on woodland soils in the Netherlands. III. Aluminium chemistry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 51, 1640–1646.Google Scholar
  8. ReussJ O and JohnsonD W 1986 Acid Deposition and the Acidification of Soils and Waters. Ecological Studies 59. Springer-Verlag, New York. 119 p.Google Scholar
  9. ReynoldsB 1984 A simple method for the extraction of soil solution by high speed centrifuge. Plant and Soil 78, 437–440.Google Scholar
  10. Rost-SiebertK 1983 Aluminium-Toxizität und Toleranz an Keimpflanzen von Fichte (Picea abies Karst.) and Buche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Allg. Forstzschr. 38, 686–689.Google Scholar
  11. SearleP L 1975 Automated colorimetric determination of ammonium ions in soil extracts with ‘Technicon Autoanalyser II’ equipment. N. Z. J. Agric. Res. 18, 183–187.Google Scholar
  12. StenzelA und HerrmannR 1988 Verhalten verschiedener Aluminium Species im Fluss und Bodenwasser des Fichtelgebirges. Deutsche Gewässerkdl. Mitt. 32, 2–7.Google Scholar
  13. UlrichB and MatznerE 1986 Anthropogenic and natural acidification in terrestrial ecosystems. Experientia 42, 344–350.Google Scholar
  14. UlrichB, MayerR and KhannaP K 1980 Chemical changes due to acid precipitation in a loess-derived soil in central Europe. Soil Sci. 130, 193–199.Google Scholar
  15. VerhoevenW, HerrmannR, EidenR and KlemmO 1987 A comparison of the chemical composition of fog and rainwater collected in the Fichtelgebirge, FRG and from the South Island of New Zealand. Theor. Appl. Klimatol. 38, 210–221.Google Scholar
  16. ZechW, SuttnerT and PoppE 1985 Elemental analyses and physiological responses of forest trees in SO2-polluted areas of NE Bavaria. Water Air Soil Pollut. 25, 175–183.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. R. Davis
    • 1
  1. 1.Forest Research InstituteChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations