Physical control of Eurasian watermilfoil in an oligotrophic lake
- 136 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
The introduction of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) into oligotrophic waters of high water clarity in temperate zones of North America has produced growth in excess of 6 m depth and yearly biomass approaching 1000 g m−2 dry weight. From its initial observation in Lake George, New York, USA in 1985, by 1993 milfoil had spread to 106 discrete locations within the lake. A 7-year study of one site having no management showed milfoil to grow expansively, suppressing native plant species from 20 in 1987 to 6 in 1993 with the average number of species m−2 quadrat declining from 5.5 in 1987 to less than 2 in 1993. Management of milfoil by means of hand harvesting, suction harvesting and benthic barrier has reduced the number of unmanaged sites from 106 in 1993 to 11. One year post-treatment at sites utilizing suction harvesting, showed a greater number of native species at all sites than pretreatment with a substantial reduction in milfoil biomass. At sites where benthic barrier was removed 1–2 years after installation, milfoil had recolonized 44% of grid squares within 30 days. Ninety days after barrier removal 74% of grid squares contained milfoil and one year later 71% of the grids supported milfoil. During the first year following mat removal, the average number of species m−2 peaked at 4.7 and stabilized at 4.5 during the second year. Hand harvesting by SCUBA in areas of limited milfoil growth (new sites of infestation and sites of former treatment) was found to reduce the number of milfoil plants present in subsequent years. Hand harvesting did not eliminate milfoil at any of the sites and regrowth/colonization necessitated reharvesting every 3 or more years. Results of evaluations of physical plant management techniques indicate that (1) an integrated program utilizing different techniques based on plant density reduced the growth of milfoil and (2) long term commitment to aquatic plant management is necessary since none of the techniques employed singly were found to eliminate milfoil.
Key words
Benthic barrier milfoil Myriophyllum spicatum suction harvestingPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Collins, C. D., R. B. Sheldon & C. W. Boylen, 1987. Littoral zone macrophyte community structure: Distribution and association of species along physical gradients in Lake George, New York, U.S.A. Aquat Bot. 29: 177–194.Google Scholar
- Couch, R. & E. Nelson, 1985. Myriophyllum spicatum in North America, Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) and Related Haloragaceae Species, 23–24 July 1985, Vancouver, British Columbia, Aquatic Plant Management Society, Vicksburg, MS.Google Scholar
- Daubenmire, R., 1968. Plant Communities: A Textbook of Synecology. Harper and Row, New York. 300 pp.Google Scholar
- Eichler, L. W., R. T. Bombard, J. W. Sutherland & C. W. Boylen, 1993. Suction harvesting of Euasian watermilfoil and its effect on native plant communities. J. aquat. Plant Mgmt 31: 144–148.Google Scholar
- Eichler, L. W., R. T. Bombard & C. W. Boylen, 1994. Final Report on the Lake George Eurasian Watermilfoil Survey for 1993. Fresh Water Institute Technical report 94–1, Troy, New York 53 pp.Google Scholar
- Engel, S., 1984. Evaluating stationary blankets and removable screens for macrophyte control in lakes. J. aquat. Plant Mgmt 22: 43–48.Google Scholar
- Madsen, J. D., L. W. Eichler & C. W. Boylen, 1988. Vegetative spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake George, New York. J. aquat. Plant Mgmt 26: 47–50.Google Scholar
- Madsen, J. D., J. W. Sutherland, J. A. Bloomfield, K. M. Roy, L. W. Eichler & C. W. Boylen, 1989. Lake George Aquatic Plant Survey: Final Report. New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany, New York. May 1989.Google Scholar
- Madsen, J. D., J. W. Sutherland, J. A. Bloomfield, L. W. Eicher & C. W. Boylen, 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J. aquat. Plant Mgmt 29: 94–99.Google Scholar
- Perkins, M. A., H. L. Boston & E. F. Curren, 1980. The use of fiberglass screens for control of Eurasian watermilfoil. J. aquat. Plant Mgmt 18: 13–19.Google Scholar
- Reed, C. F., 1977. History and distribution of Eurasian watermilfoil in the United States and Canada. Phytologia 36: 417–436.Google Scholar