The effect of soil aggregate size on early growth and shoot-root ratio of maize (Zea mays L.)
- 132 Downloads
- 10 Citations
Abstract
Shoot dry mass and leaf area of 16-d old maize plants decreased as soil aggregate size in greenhouse pots increased in diameter from 0.075–0.5 to 4–8 mm. Root length was also much greater on the finer aggregate beds, due primarily to increased growth of second-order laterals. In a subsequent experiment in which shoot dry matter again decreased with increasing aggregate size, it was found that a similar change in root morphology as noted in experiment I resulted in increased root dry mass as aggregate size increased. The associated change in shoot-root ratio was significant eight days after emergence. This change was due to a change in allocation of fixed carbon rather than allocation of seed reserves. Neither transpiration rate per unit leaf area, nor net assimilation rate were affected by aggregate size. Likewise nutrition could not account for the differences in shoot or root growth.
Key words
aggregate size carbon allocation maize shoot-root ratioPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- Basson W D, Bohmer R G and Stanton P A 1969 An automated procedure for the determination of boron in plant tissue. Analyst 94, 1135–1141.Google Scholar
- Donald R G, Kay B D and Miller M H 1987 The effect of soil aggregate size on early shoot and root growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant and Soil 103, 251–259.Google Scholar
- Dow E W 1981 Resistance to drought and density stress in Canadian and European maize (Zea mays L.) hybrids. M.Sc. Thesis University of Guelph, Ont., Canada.Google Scholar
- Goss M J 1977 Effects of mechanical impedance on root growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). I. Effects on elongation and branching of seminal roots. J. Exp. Bot. 28, 96–111.Google Scholar
- Goss M J and Russell R S 1980 Effects of mechanical impedance on root growth in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). III. Observations on the mechanism of response. J. Exp. Bot. 31, 577–588.Google Scholar
- Hoff D J and Mederski H J 1958 The chemical estimation of plant available soil manganese. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 22, 129–132.Google Scholar
- Jones J B, Eck H V and Voss R. 1990 Plant analysis as an aid in fertilizing corn and grain sorghum. In Soil Testing and Plant Analysis, Third edition. Ed. R L Westerman. Soil Science Society of America Inc., Madison, WI. 784p.Google Scholar
- Lindsay W L and Norvell W A 1978 Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 42, 421–428.Google Scholar
- Logsdon S D, Parker J C and Reneau R B 1987 Root growth as influenced by aggregate size. Plant and Soil 99, 267–275.Google Scholar
- Logsdon S D, Reneau R B and Parker J C 1987 Corn seedling root growth as influenced by soil physical properties. Agron. J. 79, 221–224.Google Scholar
- Scholander P F, Hammel H T, Bradstreet E D and Hemmingsen E A 1965 Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148, 339–346.Google Scholar
- Taylor M S 1974 The effect of soil aggregate size on seedling emergence and early growth. E. Afr. Agric. For. J. 40, 204–213.Google Scholar
- Tennant D 1975 A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecology 63, 995–1001.Google Scholar
- Thomas R L, Sheard R W and Moyer J R 1967 Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron. J. 59, 240–243.Google Scholar