Plant and Soil

, Volume 133, Issue 1, pp 57–64 | Cite as

Selenium uptake by plants as a function of soil type, organic matter content and pH

  • Lars Johnsson


In pots containing sandy soils at two levels (pH 5 and 7) to which 0.5 mg Se L-1 soil had been added, an increase in the proportion of clay soil or peat soil led to a decrease in the uptake of Se by spring wheat grain (Triticum aestivum L., var. Drabant) and winter rape plants (Brassica napus L., var. Emil). The effect was most pronounced for the smallest additions of clay and peat soils. Differences in Se uptake between the two pH levels were greatest in treatments where the additions of clay and peat soils were small. At the high pH, an increase in clay content from 7% to 39% resulted in a decrease in Se uptake of 79% for wheat and 70% for rape. At the low pH, the uptake decreased by 72% and 77%, respectively. At the higher pH, an increase in the content of organic matter from 1.4% to 39% resulted in decreases in Se uptake of 88% for wheat grain and 69% for rape. At the low pH, Se uptake decreased by 63% and 48%, respectively. Adding peat soil to clay soil had little effect on Se uptake. Among the limed, unmixed clay, sand and peat soils to which Se had not been added, uptake was highest from the sandy soil, i.e. 8.3 ng Se/g wheat grain and 42 ng Se/g rape. The lowest uptake rates were obtained in the clay soil, i.e. 3.0 ng Se/g for wheat grain and 9.0 ng Se/g for rape.

Key words

Brassica napus L. organic matter pH selenium soil type Triticum aestivum L. 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. CaryE E, WeiczorekG A and AllawayW H 1967 Reactions of selenite selenium added to soils that produce low selenium forage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31, 21–26.Google Scholar
  2. FrostR R and GriffinR A 1977 Effect of pH on adsorption of arsenic and selenium from landfill leachate by clay minerals. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 53–56.Google Scholar
  3. GeeringH R, CangE E, JonesL H P and AllawayW H 1968 Solubility and redox criteria for the possible forms of selenium in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 32, 35–40.Google Scholar
  4. Gissel-NielssenG 1971 Influence of pH and texture of the soil on plant uptake of added selenium. J. Food Chem. 19, 1165–1167.Google Scholar
  5. Gissel-NielsenG 1973 Uptake and distribution of added selenite and selenate by barley and red clover as influenced by sulphur. J. Sci. Food Agric. 24, 649–655.Google Scholar
  6. Gissel-NielsenG, UmeshC G, LamandM and WestermarckT 1984 Selenium in soils and plants and its importance in livestock and human nutrition. Adv. Agron. 37, 397–460.Google Scholar
  7. GrothD H 1976 Interactions of mercury cadmium, selenium, tellurium, arsenic and beryllium. In Effects and Dose-Response Relationship of Toxic Metals. Ed. G FNordberg. pp 527–543. Elsevier Scient. Publ. Co., Amsterdam, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  8. HamdyA A and Gissel-NielsenG 1976a Volatilization of selenium from soils. Z. Pflanzenern. Bodenkd. 6, 63–70.Google Scholar
  9. HamdyA A and Gissel-NielsenG 1976b Fractionation of soil selenium. Z. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 6, 697–703.Google Scholar
  10. HamdyA A and Gissel-NielsenG 1977 Fixation of selenium by clay minerals and iron oxides. Pflanzenernaehr. Bodenkd. 140, 63–70.Google Scholar
  11. JensenL S 1974 Interaction of silver and copper and selenium in chicks. Fed. Proc. 33, 694.Google Scholar
  12. Johnsson L 1987 Selen i svenska äkerjordar: Selen i spannmål. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Report 26, 53–59.Google Scholar
  13. JohnssonL 1989 Se levels in the mor layer of Swedish forest soils. Swedish J. Agric. Res. 19, 21–28.Google Scholar
  14. LindbergP 1968 Selenium determination in plant and animal material and in water. Acta Vet. Scand. 23, 48.Google Scholar
  15. LindbergP and BingeforsS 1970 Selenium levels of forages and soils in different regions of Sweden. Acta Agric. Scand. 20, 133–136.Google Scholar
  16. MontgomeryD C 1983 Design and Analyses of Experiments. 2nd ed. Wiley, New York, 538 p.Google Scholar
  17. ParizekJ, KalouskovaJ, BabickyA, BenesJ and PaulikL 1974 Interaction of selenium with mercury, cadmium and other toxic metals. In Trace Element Metabolism in Animals 2. Eds. W GHoekstra, J WSuttie, H EGantu and WMertz. pp 119–131. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  18. PlotnikovV I 1960 Coprecipitation of selenium and tellurium with metal hydroxides. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 5, 351–354.Google Scholar
  19. RotruckJ T, PopeA L, GantherH E, SwansonA B, HofmanD and HoekstraW G 1973 Selenium: Biochemical role as a component of glutathione peroxidase. Science 179, 588–590.Google Scholar
  20. SAS Institute Inc., 1985. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.Google Scholar
  21. WeastRobert C (ed.) 1968 Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 49th ed. The Chemical Rubber Co., Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
  22. Vokal-Borek H and Hellsten E 1982 Selen. Inst. Theoretical Physics, Univ. Stockholm. (VSIP-Report 82–03).Google Scholar
  23. YlärantaT 1983 Sorption of selenite and selenate in the soil. Ann. Agric. Fen. 22, 29–39.Google Scholar
  24. Yläranta T 1987 Selengödsling i Finland: Selen i spannmål. Royal Swedish Academy of Agriculture and Forestry, Report 26, 66–75.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lars Johnsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil SciencesSwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations