Plant and Soil

, Volume 178, Issue 1, pp 153–160 | Cite as

Re-sorption of organic compounds by roots of Zea mays L. and its consequences in the rhizosphere

III. Characteristics of sugar influx and efflux
  • David L. Jones
  • Peter R. Darrah
Research Article

Abstract

The influx and efflux of sugar-C and the cycling of C within intact maize roots (Zea mays L.) was studied in sterile solution culture. Using metabolic inhibitors it was shown that roots could take up sugars against the concentration gradient probably via H+-ATPase dependent plasmalemma proton cotransporters. In contrast to this, no evidence was found for an ATPase mediated efflux of sugars from the root. All parts of the root were capable of taking up exogenous sugars. Examination of sugar exudation sites along the root slowed efflux at all locations, with the amount of efflux linearly correlated with internal cellular concentration. The results clearly indicated that the influxefflux mechanisms are linked both spatially, temporally and with respect to the sugars capable of transportation. The turnover of C within the root was found to be extremely rapid with turnover of the soluble sugar pool being 0.8 to 15 times daily depending on root spatial location. The results strongly suggest that the recapture of sugars from outside the root plays an important role in regulating the amount of C lost to the soil which in turn will reduce both pathogen attraction and the size of the rhizosphere microbial population and will also increase the plant's C efficiency.

Key words

carbon flow maize rhizosphere root sugar 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bowen G D and Rovira A D 1973 Are modelling approaches useful in rhizosphere biology? Bull. Ecol. Res. Comm. 17, 443–450.Google Scholar
  2. Bresseleers G, Goderis H and Tobback P 1984 Measurement of the glucose permeation rate across phospholipid bilayers using unilaminar vesicles. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 772, 374–382.Google Scholar
  3. Briskin D P and Hanson J B 1992 How does the plant plasma membrane H+-ATPase pump protons. J. Exp. Bot. 43, 269–289.Google Scholar
  4. Bush D R 1993 Proton-coupled sugar and amino acid transports in plants. Ann. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 44, 513–542.Google Scholar
  5. Coody P N, Sommers L E and Nelson D W 1986 Kinetics of glucose uptake by soil microorganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 18, 283–289.Google Scholar
  6. Curl E A and Trueglove B 1986 The Rhizosphere. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. 288p.Google Scholar
  7. DiTomaso J M, Hart J J and Kochian L V 1992 Transport kinetics and metabolism of exogenously applied putrescine in roots of intact maize seedlings. Plant Physiol. 98, 611–620.Google Scholar
  8. Farrar J F 1985 Fluxes of carbon in roots of barley plants. New Phytol. 99, 57–69.Google Scholar
  9. Fieuw S and Patrick J W 1993 Mechanism of photosynthate efflux from Vicia faba L. seed coats. J. Exp. Bot. 44, 65–74.Google Scholar
  10. Jones D L and Darrah P R 1992 Re-sorption of organic compounds by roots of Zea mays L. and its consequences in the rhizosphere I. Re-sortion of 14C labelled glucose, mannose and citric acid. Plant and Soil 143, 259–266.Google Scholar
  11. Jones D L and Darah P R 1993 Re-sorption of organic compounds by rots of Zea mays L. and its consequences in the rhizosphere II. Experimental and model evidence for simultaneous exudation and re-sorption of compounds. Plant and Soil 153, 47–59.Google Scholar
  12. Jones D L and Darrah P R 1994 Influx and efflux of amino acids from Zea mays L. roots and its implications in the rhizosphere. Plant and Soil 163, 1–12.Google Scholar
  13. Kennedy C D 1977 The effect of D-glucose and other sugars on the trans-root potential of Zea mays. J. Exp. Bot. 28, 903–908.Google Scholar
  14. Klein D A, Salzwedel J L and Dazzo F B 1990 Microbial colonization of plant roots. In Biotechnology of Plant-microbe Interactions. Eds. J P Nakas and C Hagedorn. pp 189–225. McGraw-Hill Inc., USA.Google Scholar
  15. Komor E 1973 Proton coupled hexose transport in Chlorella vulgaris. FEBS Lett. 38, 16–18.Google Scholar
  16. Komor E, Weber H and Tanner W 1978 Essential sulfhydryl group in the transport-catalyzing protein of the hexose-proton cotransport system of Chlorella. Plant Physiol. 61, 785–786.Google Scholar
  17. Komor E, Thom M and Maretzki A 1982 Vacuoles from sugarcane suspension cultures. III. Protonmotive potential difference. Plant Physiol. 69, 1326–1330.Google Scholar
  18. Kraffczyk I, Trolldeiner G and Beringer H 1984 Soluble root exudates of maize: Influence of potassium supply and rhizosphere microorganisms. Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 315–322.Google Scholar
  19. Lucas W J and Madore M A 1988 Recent advances in sugar transport. In The Biochemistry of Plants. A Comprehensive Treatise, Volume 14: Carbohydrates. Ed. J Preiss. pp 35–84. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Porter G A, Knieval D P and Shannon J C 1985 Sugar efflux from maize Zea mays L. pedicel tissue. Plant Physiol. 77, 524–531.Google Scholar
  21. Sturgeon R J 1990 Monosaccharides. In Methods of Plant Biochemistry, Volume 2: Carbohydrates. Ed. P M Dey. p 25. Academic Press, London, UK.Google Scholar
  22. VonWiren N, Mori S, Marschner H and Römheld V 1994 Iron inefficiency in maize mutant ys 1 (Zea mays L. Yellow-stripe) is caused by a defect in uptake of iron phytosiderophores. Plant Physiol. 106, 71–77.Google Scholar
  23. Whipps J M 1990 Carbon economy. In The Rhizosphere. Ed. J M Lynch. pp 59–97. Wiley Interscience, London, UK.Google Scholar
  24. Xia J and Saglio P H 1988 Characterization of the hexose transport system in maize root tips. Plant Physiol. 88, 1015–1020.Google Scholar
  25. Xia J and Saglio P H 1990 H+ efflux and hexose transport under imposed energy status in maize root tips. Plant Physiol. 93, 453–458.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • David L. Jones
    • 1
    • 2
  • Peter R. Darrah
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.US Plant, Soil and Nutrition Lab.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations