Plant and Soil

, Volume 182, Issue 1, pp 13–23 | Cite as

Compared cycling in a soil-plant system of pea and barley residue nitrogen

  • Erik Steen Jensen
Article

Abstract

Field experiments were carried out on a temperate soil to determine the decline rate, the stabilization in soil organic matter and the plant uptake of N from 15N-labelled crop residues. The fate of N from field pea (Pisum sativum L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) residues was followed in unplanted and planted plots and related to their chemical composition. In the top 10 cm of unplanted plots, inorganic N was immobilized after barley residue incorporation, whereas the inorganic N pool was increased during the initial 30 days after incorporation (DAI) of pea residues. Initial net mineralization of N was highly correlated to the concentrations of soluble C and N and the lignin: N ratio of residues. The contribution of residue-derived N to the inorganic N pool was at its maximum 30 DAI (10–55%) and declined to on average 5% after 3 years of decomposition.

Residual organic labelled N in the top 10 cm soil declined rapidly during the initial 86 DAI for all residue types. Leaching of soluble organic materials may have contributed to this decline. At 216 DAI 72, 59 and 45% of the barley, mature pea and green pea residue N, respectively, were present in organic N-forms in the topsoil. During the 1–3 year period, residual organic labelled N from different residues declined at similar rates, mean decay constant: 0.18 yr-1. After 3 years, 45% of the barley and on average 32% of the pea residue N were present as soil organic N. The proportion of residue N remaining in the soil after 3 years of decomposition was most strongly correlated with the total and soluble N concentrations in the residue. The ratio (% inorganic N derived from residues): (% organic N derived from residues) was used as a measure of the rate residue N stabilization. From initial values of 3–7 the ratios declined to on average 1.9 and 1.6 after 2 and 3 yrs, respectively, indicating that a major part of the residue N was stabilized after 2 years of decomposition. Even though the largest proportion of residue N stabilized after 3 years was found for barley, the largest amount of residue N stabilized was found with incorporation of pea residues, since much more N was incorporated with these residues.

In planted plots and after one year of decomposition, 7% of the pea and 5% of the barley residue N were recovered in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) shoots. After 2 years the cumulative recovery of residue N in ryegrass shoots and roots was 14% for pea and 15% for barley residue N. The total uptake of non-labelled soil N after 2 years of growth was similar in the two residue treatments, but the amount of soil N taken up in each growth period varied between the treatments, apparently because the soil N immobilized during initial decomposition of residues was remineralized later in the barley than in the pea residue treatment. Balances were established for the amounts of barley and mature pea residue N remaining in the 0–10 cm soil layer and taken up in ryegrass after 2 years of decomposition. About 24% of the barley and 35% of the pea residue N were unaccounted for. Since these apparent losses are comparable to almost twice the amounts of pea and barley residue N taken up by the perennial ryegrass crop, there seems to be a potential for improved crop residue management in order to conserve nutrients in the soil-plant system.

Key words

crop residues Hordeum vulgare L. 15N, N-cycling Pisum sativum L. 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ambus P and Jensen E S 1995 Soil nitrogen mineralization-immobilization as influenced by crop residue particle size. In Agronomy Abstracts, 1995 Annual Meetings, p 255. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Missouri, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Amato M, Ladd J N, Ellington A, Ford G, Mahoney J E, Taylor A C and Walsgott D 1987 Decomposition of plant materials in Australian Soils. IV Decomposition in situ of 14C- and 15N-labelled legume and wheat materials in a range of Southern Australian soils. Aust. J. Soil Res. 25, 95–105.Google Scholar
  3. Aulakh M S, Doran J W, Walters D T, Mosier A R and Francis D D 1991 Crop residue type and placement effects on denitrification and mineralization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 1020–1025.Google Scholar
  4. Becker M, Ladha J K, Simpson I C and Ottow J G G 1994 Parameters affecting residue nitrogen mineralization in flooded soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 1666–1671.Google Scholar
  5. Bremer E and vanKessel C 1992 Plant-available nitrogen from lentil and wheat residues during a subsequent growing season. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 1155–1160.Google Scholar
  6. Broadbent F E and Nakashima T 1967 Reversion of fertilizer nitrogen in soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 31, 648–652.Google Scholar
  7. Broder M W and Wagner G H 1988 Microbial colonization and decomposition of corn, wheat, and soybean residue. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 112–117.Google Scholar
  8. Campbell C A and Zentner R P 1993 Soil organic matter as influenced by crop rotations and fertilization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 1034–1040.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen B 1986 Barley straw decomposition under field conditions: Effect of placement and initial nitrogen content on weight loss and nitrogen dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 18, 523–529.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen B 1992 Physical fractionation of soil and organic matter in primary particle size and density separates. Adv. Soil. Sci. 20, 2–90.Google Scholar
  11. Dormaar J F 1990 Effect of active roots on the decomposition of soil organic materials. Biol. Fertil. Soils 10, 121–126.Google Scholar
  12. Fox R H, Myers R J K and Vallis I 1990 The nitrogen mineralization rate of legume residues in soil as influenced by their polyphenol, lignin and nitrogen contents. Plant and Soil 129, 251–259.Google Scholar
  13. Franzluebbers A J, Hons F M and Zuberer D A 1994 Long-term changes in soil carbon and nitrogen pools in wheat management systems. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 1639–1645.Google Scholar
  14. Hadas A, Sofer M, Molina J A E, Barak P and Clapp C E 1992 Assimilation of nitrogen by soil microbial population: NH4 versus organic N. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24, 137–143.Google Scholar
  15. Jans-Hammermeister D C, McGill W B and Jensen T L 1994 Dynamics of 15N in two soil plant systems following incorporation of 10% bloom and full bloom field pea. Can. J. Soil Sci. 74, 99–107.Google Scholar
  16. Jansson S L and Persson J 1982 Mineralization and immobilization of soil nitrogen. In Nitrogen in Agricultural Soils. Ed. F J Stevenson. pp 229–252. ASA Special Publication No. 22, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  17. Janzen H H and Radder G D 1989 Nitrogen mineralization in a green manure-amended soil as influenced by cropping history and subsequent crop. Plant and Soil 120, 125–131.Google Scholar
  18. Jenkinson D S 1981 The fate of plant and animal residues in soil. In The Chemistry of Soil Processes. Eds. D JGreenland and M H BHayes. pp 505–561. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Jenkinson D S, Fox R H and Rayner J H 1985 Interactions between fertilizer nitrogen and soil nitrogen — the so-called ‘priming’ effect. J. Soil. Sci. 36, 425–444.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen E S 1991 Evaluation of automated analysis of 15N and total N in plant material and soil. Plant and Soil 133, 83–92.Google Scholar
  21. Jensen E S 1994a Dynamics of mature pea residue nitrogen turnover in unplanted soil under field conditions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 455–464.Google Scholar
  22. Jensen E S 1994b Availability of nitrogen in 15N-labelled mature pea residues to subsequent crops in the field. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 465–472.Google Scholar
  23. Jensen E S 1994c Leaching in small lysimeters of nitrate derived from nitrogen-15-labeled field pea residues. J. Environ. Qual. 23, 1045–1050.Google Scholar
  24. Ladd J N and Foster R C 1988 Role of microflora in nitrogen turnover. In Advances in Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems. Ed. J RWilson, pp 113–129. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.Google Scholar
  25. Ladd J N, Jackson R B, Amato M and Butler J H A 1983 Decomposition of plant material in Australian soils. I. The effect of quantity added on decomposition and on residual microbial biomass. Aust. J. Soil Res. 21, 563–570.Google Scholar
  26. Mary B, Recous S, Darwis D and Robin D 1996 Interactions between decomposition of plant residues and nitrogen cycling in soil. Plant and Soil 181.Google Scholar
  27. Merckx R, Dijkstra A, denHartog A and vanVeen J A 1987 Production of root-derived material and associated microbial growth in soil at different nutrient levels. Biol. Fertil. Soils 5, 126–132.Google Scholar
  28. Müller M M, Sundman V, Soininvaara O and Meriläinen A 1988 Effect of chemical composition on the release of nitrogen from agricultural plant materials decomposing in soil under field conditions. Biol. Fertil. Soils 6, 78–83.Google Scholar
  29. Norman R J, Gilmour J T and Wells B R 1990 Mineralization of nitrogen from nitrogen-15 labeled crop residues and utilization by rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 54, 1351–1356.Google Scholar
  30. Ocio J A, Brookes P C and Jenkinson D S 1991 Field incorporation of straw and its effect on soil microbial biomass and soil inorganic N. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 171–176.Google Scholar
  31. Parr J F and Papendick R I 1978 Factors affecting the decomposition of crop residues by microorganisms. In Crop Residue Management Systems. Ed. W ROschwald. pp 101–129. ASA Publication No. 31., American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Powlson D S, Brookes P C and Christensen B T 1987 Measurement of soil microbial biomass provides an early indication of changes in total soil organic matter due to straw incorporation. Soil Biol. Biochem. 19, 159–164.Google Scholar
  33. Powlson D S, Jenkinson D S, Pruden G and Johnston A E 1985 The effect of straw incorporation on the uptake of nitrogen by winter wheat. J. Sci. Food Agric. 36, 26–30.Google Scholar
  34. Rasmussen P E and Parton W J 1994 Long-term effects of residue management in wheat-fallow: I. Inputs, yield, and soil organic matter. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 523–530.Google Scholar
  35. Recous S, Robin D, Darwis D and Mary B 1995 Soil inorganic N availability: Effect on maize residue decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 27, 1529–1538Google Scholar
  36. Reinertsen S A, Elliott L F, Cochran V L and Campbell G S 1984 Role of available carbon and nitrogen in determining the rate of wheat straw decomposition. Soil Biol. Biochem. 16, 459–464.Google Scholar
  37. SAS 1990 SAS Procedures Guide. Version 6, Third edition. Cary, NC, USA. SAS Institute, Inc., 705 p.Google Scholar
  38. Sparling G P, Cheshire M V and Mundie C M 1982 Effect of barley plants on the decomposition of 14C-labelled soil organic matter. J. Soil Sci. 33, 89–100.Google Scholar
  39. Sørensen L H 1981 Carbon-nitrogen relationships during the humification of cellulose in soil containing different amounts of clay. Soil Biol. Biochem. 13, 313–321.Google Scholar
  40. VanSoest P J 1963 Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fiber and lignin. J. Assoc. Anal. Chem. 46, 829–835.Google Scholar
  41. Vigil M F and Kissel D E 1991 Equations for estimating the amount of nitrogen mineralized from crop residues. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 55, 757–761.Google Scholar
  42. Voroney R P, Paul E A and Anderson D W 1989 Decomposition of wheat straw and stabilization of microbial products. Can. J. Soil Sci. 69, 63–77.Google Scholar
  43. Waksman S A and Tenney F 1928 Composition of natural organic materials and their decomposition in the soil: III. The influence of nature of plant upon the rapidity of its decomposition. Soil Sci. 26, 155–171.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Steen Jensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Plant Nutrition, Environmental Science and Technology DepartmentRiø National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark

Personalised recommendations