Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 127, Issue 1, pp 13–21 | Cite as

Effect of pH and nitrogen source on aluminium tolerance of rye (Secale cereale L.) and yellow lupin (Lupinus luteus L.)

  • U. E. Grauer
  • W. J. Horst
Article

Abstract

Soluble aluminium (Al) is a major factor limiting plant growth in acid mineral soils. Aluminium concentrations in soil solutions are mainly determined by soil pH. However, pH also affects the ratio between activities of protons and cationic Al species and the equilibrium between mono-and polynuclear hydroxy-Al species. The phytotoxicity of these species is not yet clear. The objective of the present study was to clarify the role of minor changes of pH in the rhizosphere on Al phytotoxicity in two Al-tolerant plant species by direct control of the pH in the nutrient solution (4.1, 4.3, 4.5) and in addition by varying the pH in the root apoplast using either nitrate or ammonium as N source. The plants were grown in solution culture at constant external pH. Whereas the Al-sensitive plant species barley and horse bean were damaged at very low Al supplies (1.85 μM and 9.3 μM respectively), 222 μM had to be applied to rye and yellw lupin for a comparable inhibition of root elongation. Yellow lupin was initially severely inhibited in root growth by Al, but then gradually recovered from this ‘Al shock’ within 3 days. In contrast to lupin, rye was hardly affected by Al initially, and it took about 16 h until maximum inhibition of root elongation. In the presence of nitrate, raising the pH from 4.1 to 4.5 aggravated root-growth depression by Al in rye and lupin. Whereas rye roots were severely damaged by ammonium especially at low pH, lupin was rather indifferent to the N source. Aluminium toxicity was less severe in presence of ammonium compared to nitrate N. This effect was less clear with rye at lower pH, because of it's higher proton sensitivity compared to lupin. Less Al injury at lower pH and in presence of ammonium was related to lower Al concentrations in the 1 cm root tips. The results are compatible with data showing high phytotoxicity of mononuclear and polynuclear hydroxy-Al species. However, they could also be interpreted in the light of proton amelioration of Al toxicity owing to competition for Al-sensitive binding sites in the root apoplast.

Key words

aluminium lupin nitrogen form pH roots rye toxicity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alva, A K, Edwards, D G, Asher, C J and Blamey, F P C 1986 Relationship between root length of soybean and calculated activities of aluminium monomers in nutrient solution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 959–962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aniol, A 1984 Induction of aluminium tolerance in wheat seedlings by low doses of aluminium in the nutrient solution. Plant Physiol. 76, 551–555.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertsch, P M 1989 Aqueous polynuclear aluminium species. In The Environmental Chemistry of Aluminium. Ed. G Sposito. pp 87–115. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  4. Cameron, R S, Ritchie, G S P and Robson, A D 1986 Relative toxicities of inorganic aluminium complexes to barley. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 1231–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dougan, W K and Wilson, A L 1974 The absorptiometric determination of aluminium in water: A comparison of some chromogenic reagents and the development of an improved method Analyst 99, 413–430.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Griffin, G P and Jurinak, J J 1973 Estimation of activity coefficients from the electrical conductivity of natural aquatic systems and soil extracts. Soil Sci. 116, 26–30.Google Scholar
  7. Horst, W J, Wagner, A and Marschner, H 1983 Effect of aluminium on root growth, cell-division rate and mineral element contents in roots of Vigna unguiculata genotypes. Z. Pflanzenphysiol. 109, 95–103.Google Scholar
  8. Hue, N V, Craddock, G R and Adams, F 1986 Effect of organic acids on aluminium toxicity in subsoils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50, 28–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Keltjens, W G and Ulden, P S Rvan 1987 Effects of Al on nitrogen (NH4 + and NO3 -) uptake, nitrate reductase activity and proton release in two sorghum cultivars differing in Al tolerance. Plant and Soil 104, 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kinraide, T B and Parker, D R 1987a Cation amelioration of aluminium toxicity in wheat. Plant Physiol. 83, 546–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kinraide, T B and Parker, D R 1987b Non-phytotoxicity of the aluminium sulfate ion, AlSO4 +. Physiol. Plant. 71, 207–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kinraide, T B and Parker, D R 1989 Assessing the phytotoxicity of mononuclear hydroxy-aluminum. Plant Cell Environ. 12, 479–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klotz, F and Horst, W J 1988a Effect of ammonium-and nitrate nutrition on aluminium tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L.). Plant and Soil 111, 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Klotz, F and Horst, W J 1988b Genotypic differences in aluminium tolerance of soybean (Glycine max L.) as affected by ammonium and nitrate-nitrogen nutrition. J. Plant Physiol. 132, 702–707.Google Scholar
  15. Korkisch, J 1989 Handbook of Ion Exchange Resins. Vol. 1, pp 15–16. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  16. Moore, D P 1974 Physiological effects of pH on roots. In The Plant Root and Its Environment. Ed. E WCarson. pp 135–151. Charlottesville Univ. Press, VA.Google Scholar
  17. NgKee Kwong, K F and Huang, P M 1979 The relative influence of low-molecular weight complexing organic acids on the hydrolysis and precipitation of aluminium. Soil Sci. 128, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nordstrom, D K and May, H M 1989 Aqueous equilibrium data for mononuclear aluminium species. In The Environmental Chemistry of Aluminium. Ed. GSposito. pp 29–53. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.Google Scholar
  19. Parker, D R, Zelazny, L W and Kinraide, L W 1987 Improvement to the program GEOCHEM. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51, 488–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Parker, D R, Kinraide, T B and Zelazny, L W 1988 Aluminium speciation and phytotoxicity in dilute hydroxy-aluminium solutions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 438–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pavan, M A and Bingham, F T 1982 Toxicity of aluminium to coffee seedlings grown in nutrient solution. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46, 993–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sposito G and Mattigod S V 1980 GEOCHEM: A computer program for the calculation of chemical equilibria in soil solutions and other natural water systems. The Kearney Foundation of Soil Science, University of California.Google Scholar
  23. Unkelbach, H D and Pöch, G 1988 Comparison of independence and additivity in drug combination. Arzneim. Forsch./Drug. Res. 38, 1–6.Google Scholar
  24. Wagatsuma, T and Ezoe, Y 1985 Effect of pH on ionic species of aluminium in medium and on aluminium toxicity under solution culture. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 31, 547–561.Google Scholar
  25. Wagatsuma, T and Kaneko, M 1987 High toxicity of hydroxy-aluminium polymer ions to plant roots. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 33, 57–67.Google Scholar
  26. Wrigth, R J, Baligar, V C, Ritchey, K D and Wright, S F 1989 Influence of soil solution aluminium on root elongation of wheat seedlings. Plant and Soil 113, 294–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. E. Grauer
    • 1
    • 2
  • W. J. Horst
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Plant NutritionUniversity of HohenheimStuttgart 70FRG
  2. 2.Institute of Plant NutritionUniversity of HannoverHannover 21FRG

Personalised recommendations