Hydrobiologia

, Volume 336, Issue 1–3, pp 19–32 | Cite as

3. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms

  • D. G. Mann
  • S. J. M. Droop

Abstract

Recent morphometric and breeding studies of diatoms show that the present species classification is too coarse and hides significant diversity. Many species are subdivided into phenodemes, which often differ in cell size, shape, stria density and pattern, but may also have different ultrastructural features. In raphid diatoms these can include the form of the raphe endings, details of the pore occlusions, and the structure of the girdle, while chloroplast structure can also vary. The phenodemes can be sympatric or allopatric. In Sellaphora pupula and other species, sympatric phenodemes are reproductively isolated. It is recommended that such demes are recognized as separate species; the total number of diatom species worldwide may thus be at least 2 × 105. Use of a fine-grained classification reveals that many diatom species may be endemics, some restricted to a single lake or catchment, others to wider areas. Environmental impact assessments and conservation strategies must begin to take account of endemism and rarity among microscopic algae and protists.

Key words

diatoms biogeography species concept taxonomy conservation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amspoker, M. C., 1989, Nephroneis nracintirei, gen. et sp. nov., a marine araphid diatom from California, U.S.A. Diatom Res. 4: 171–177.Google Scholar
  2. Brooks, J. L., 1950. Speciation in ancient lakes. Quart. Rev. Biol. 25: 30–60, 131–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Canter, H. M. & G. H. M. Jaworski, 1978. The isolation, maintenance, and host range studies of a chytrid (Rhizophydium planktonicum) parasitic of Asterionella formosa. Ann. Bot. 42: 967–980.Google Scholar
  4. Canter, H. M. & G. H. M. Jaworski, 1979. The occurrence of a hypersensitive reaction in the planktonic diatom Asterionella formosa Hass. parasitized by the chytrid Rhizophydium planktonicum Canter in culture. New Phytol. 82: 187–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clapham, A. R., T. G. Tutin & E. F. Warburg, 1962. Flora of the British Isles. Ed, 2. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1269 pp.Google Scholar
  6. Cleve-Euler, A., 1951–55. Die Diatomeen von Schweden und Finnland. I–V. Kungl. svenska VetenskapsAkad. Handl., Ser. 4, 2(1): 1–163 (1951); 3(3): 1–153 (1952); 4(2): 1–158 (1953); 4(5): 1–255 (1953); 5(4): 1–232 (1955).Google Scholar
  7. Cocquyt, C. & W. Vyverman, 1993. Surirella sparsipunctata Hustedt and S. sparsipunctata var. laevis Hustedt (Bacillariophyceae), a light and electron microscopical study. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 97–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Denys, L., 1991. A check-list of the diatoms in the Holocene deposits of the western Belgian plain with a survey of their apparent ecological requirements. I. Introduction, ecological code and complete list. Professional Paper 1991/2, no. 246. Belgische Geologische Dienst, Brussels, 41 pp.Google Scholar
  9. Droop, S. J. M., 1994. Morphological variation in Diploneis smithii and D. fusca (Bacillariophyceae). Arch. Protistenk. 144: 249–270.Google Scholar
  10. Droop, S. J. M., 1995. A morphometric and geographical analysis of two races of Diploneis smithii/D. fusca (Baeillariophyceae) in Britain. In D. Marino & M. Montresor (eds), Proceedings of the 13th International Diatom Symposium. Biopress Ltd, Bristol: 347–369.Google Scholar
  11. Flower, R. J., 1993. A taxonomic re-evaluation of endemic Cyclotella taxa in Lake Baikal, Siberia. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 106: 203–220.Google Scholar
  12. Foged, N., 1993. Some diatoms from Siberia especially from Lake Baikal. Diatom Res. 8: 231–279.Google Scholar
  13. Gallagher, J. C., 1982. Physiological variation and electrophoretic handing patterns of genetically different seasonal populations of Skeletonema costatum (Bacillariophyceae). J. Phytol. 18: 148–162.Google Scholar
  14. Garcia-Baptista, M., 1993. Observations on the genus Hantzschia Grunow at a sandy beach in Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Diatom Res. 8: 31–43.Google Scholar
  15. Gasse, F., 1986. East African diatoms. Taxonomy, ecological distribution. Bibl. Diatomol. 11: 1–202.Google Scholar
  16. Genkal, S. I., 1990. Morphology and systematics of two endemic species of Cyclotella (Bacillariophyceae) from Lake Baikal. In H. Simola (ed.), Proceedings of the 10th International Diatom Symposium. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein: 55–60.Google Scholar
  17. Gilmour, J. S. L. & J. Heslop-Harrison, 1954. The deme terminology and the units of micro-evolutionary change. Genetica 27: 147–161.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Groombridge, B. (ed.), 1992. Global biodiversity. Status of the Earth's living resources. Chapman & Hall, London, 585 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Guillard, R. R. L. & P. Kilham, 1977. The ecology of marine planktonic diatoms. In D. Werner (ed.), The biology of diatoms (Botanical monographs 13). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 372–469.Google Scholar
  20. Hajós, M., 1974. Faciological and stratigraphic importance of the Miocene diatoms in Hungary. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 45: 365–376.Google Scholar
  21. Hajós, M., 1990. Succession of the fossil diatom floras in the Carpathian Basin, Hungary. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 100: 227–236.Google Scholar
  22. Harris, G. P., 1986. Phytoplankton ecology. Structure, function and fluctuation. Chapman & Hall, London & New York, 384 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Hartley, B., 1986. A check-list of the freshwater, brackish and marine diatoms of the British Isles and adjoining coastal waters. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 66: 531–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Haworth, E. Y. & P. A. Tyler, 1993. Morphology and taxonomy of Cyclotella tasmanica spec. nov., a newly described diatom from Tasmanian lakes. Hydrobiologia 269/270: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hendey, N. I., 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part V: Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). MAFF Fishery Investigations, series 4. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, 317 pp.Google Scholar
  26. Hendey, N. I. & P. A. Sims, 1982. A review of the genus Gomphonitzschia Grunow and the description of Gomphotheca gen. nov., an unusual diatom group from tropical waters. Bacillaria 5: 191–212.Google Scholar
  27. Hustedt, F., 1930. Bacillariophyta. In A. Pascher (ed.), Die Süsswasser-Flora Mitteleuropas, vol. 10 (2nd edn). G. Fischer, Jena, 466 pp.Google Scholar
  28. Hustedt, F., 1937a. Systematische und ökologische Untersuchungen über die Diatomeenflora von Java, Bali and Sumatra each dem Material der Deutschen Limnologischen Sunda-Expedition. Teil I. Systematischer Teil, Erste Fortsetzung. Arch. Hydrobiol., Suppl. 15: 187–295.Google Scholar
  29. Hustedt, F., 1937b. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Lander Europas Bowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In Dr L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich and der Schweiz 7 (2:5). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig: 577–736.Google Scholar
  30. Hustedt, F., 1942. Süsswasser-Diatomeen des indomalayischen Archipels und der Hawaii-Inseln. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol. Hydrogr. 42: 1–252.Google Scholar
  31. Hustedt, F., 1945. Diatomeen aus Seen und Quellgebieten der Balkan-Halbinsel. Arch. Hydrobiol. 40: 867–973.Google Scholar
  32. Hustedt, F., 1952. Neue und wenig bekannte Diatomeen. II. Ber. dtsch. bot. Ges. 64: 305–315.Google Scholar
  33. Hustedt, F., 1961. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Lander Europas Bowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In Dr L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich and der Schweiz 7 (3:1). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig: 1–160.Google Scholar
  34. Knowlton, N., 1993. Sibling species in the sea. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24: 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Knudson, B. M., 1953a. The diatom genus Tabellaria II. Taxonomy and morphology of the plankton varieties. Ann. Bot. 17: 131–155.Google Scholar
  36. Knudson, B. M., 1953b. The diatom genus Tabellaria III. Problems of infra-specific taxonomy and evolution in T. flocculosa. Ann. Bot. 17: 597–609.Google Scholar
  37. Kobayasi, H., T. Nagumo & S. Tanaka, 1993. Rhopalodia iriomotensis sp. nov., a brackish diatom with shoehorn-shaped projections on the canal raphe (Bacilladophyceae). Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 106: 133–141.Google Scholar
  38. Kociolek, J. P. & E. F. Stoermer, 1987. Geographic distribution and variability of the diatom (Bacillariophyceae) Gomphonema ventricosum Gregory. Nova Hedwigia 45: 223–236.Google Scholar
  39. Kociolek, J. P. & E. F. Stoermer, 1988. Taxonomy, ultrastructure and distribution of Gomphoneis herculeana, G. eriense and closely related species (Naviculales: Gomphonemataceae). Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad. 140: 24–97.Google Scholar
  40. Kociolek, J. P. & E. F. Stoermer, 1993. The diatom genus Gomphocymbella O. Müller: taxonomy, ultrastructure and phylogenetic relationships. Nova Hedwigia, Beih. 106: 71–91.Google Scholar
  41. Krammer, K., 1992. Pinnularia, eine Monographie der europäischen Taxa. Bibl. Diatomol. 26: 1–353.Google Scholar
  42. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1986. Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2(1). G. Fischer, Stuttgart & New York, 876 pp.Google Scholar
  43. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2(2). G. Fischer, Stuttgart & New York, 596 pp.Google Scholar
  44. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991a. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2(3). G. Fischer, Stuttgart & New York, 576 pp.Google Scholar
  45. Krammer, K. & H. Lange-Bertalot, 1991b. Bacillariophyceae 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In H. Ettl, G. Gärtner, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer (eds), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa 2(4). G. Fischer, Stuttgart & New York, 437 pp.Google Scholar
  46. Lange-Bertalot, H., 1977. Eine Revision zur Taxonomie der Nitzschiae Lanceolatae Grunow. Nova Hedwigia 28: 253–307.Google Scholar
  47. Lange-Bertalot, H., 1993. 85 neue taxa und über 100 weitere neu definierte Taxa ergänzend zur Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa Vol. 2/1–4. Bibl. Diatomol. 27: 1–454.Google Scholar
  48. Lange-Bertalot, H. & R. Simonsen, 1978. A taxonomic revision of the Nitzschiae lanceolatae Grunow 2. European and related extra-European fresh water and brackish water taxa. Bacillaria 1: 11–111.Google Scholar
  49. Mann, D. G., 1978. Studies in the family Nitzschiaceae (Bacillariophyta). Ph.D. dissertation, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  50. Mann, D. G., 1980. Studies in the diatom genus Hantzschia. II. H. distinctepunctata. Nova Hedwigia 33: 341–352.Google Scholar
  51. Mann, D. G., 1981a. Sieves and flaps: siliceous minutiae in the pores of raphid diatoms. In R. Ross (ed.), Proceedings of the 6th Symposium on Recent and Fossil Diatoms. O. Koeltz, Koenigstein: 279–300.Google Scholar
  52. Mann, D. G., 1981b. Studies in the diatom genus Hantzschia 3. Infraspecific variation in H. virgata. Ann. Bot. 47: 377–395.Google Scholar
  53. Mann, D. G., 1984. Observations on copulation in Navicula pupula and Amphora ovalis in relation to the nature of diatom species. Ann. Bot. 54: 429–438.Google Scholar
  54. Mann, D. G., 1988a. The nature of diatom species: analyses of sympatric populations. In F. E. Round (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Diatom Symposium. Biopress Ltd & Koeltz Scientific Books, Bristol & Koenigstein: 317–327.Google Scholar
  55. Mann, D. G., 1988b. Why didn't Lund see sex in Asterionella? A discussion of the diatom life cycle in nature. In F. E. Round (ed.), Algae and the Aquatic Environment. Biopress, Bristol: 383–412.Google Scholar
  56. Mann, D. G., 1989a. The diatom genus Sellaphora: separation from Navicula. Br. phycol. J. 24: 1–20.Google Scholar
  57. Mann, D. G., 1989b. The species concept in diatoms: evidence for morphologically distinct, sympatric gamodemes in four epipelic species. Pl. Syst. Evol. 164: 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Medlin, L. K., H. J. Elwood, S. Stickel & M. L. Sogin, 1991. Morphological and genetic variation within the diatom Skeletonema costatum (Bacillariophyta): evidence for a new species, Skeletonema pseudocostatum. J. Phycol. 27: 514–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Peragallo, H. & Peragallo, M. (1897–1908). Diatomées Marines de France et des Districts Maritimes Voisins. Paris & Grez-sur-Loing.Google Scholar
  60. Rackham, O., 1980. Ancient woodland, its history, vegetation and uses in England. Edward Arnold, London, 402 pp.Google Scholar
  61. Reimer, C. W. & J. J. Lee, 1984. A new pennate diatom: Protokeelia hottingeri gen. et sp. nov. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philad. 136: 194–199.Google Scholar
  62. Reynolds, C. S., 1979. The limnology of the eutrophic meres of the Shropshire-Cheshire plain: a review. Field Studies 5: 93–173.Google Scholar
  63. Ross, R., 1963. The diatom genus Capartogramma and the identity of Schizostauron. Bull. Br. Mus. nat. Hist., Botany 3: 49–92.Google Scholar
  64. Ross, R., 1983. Endemism and cosmopolitanism in the diatom flora of the East African Great Lakes. In R. W. Sims, J. H. Price & P. E. S. Whalley (eds), Evolution, time and space: the emergence of the biosphere. Systematics Association Special Volume 23. Academic Press, London: 157–177.Google Scholar
  65. Schoeman, F. R. & R. E. M. Archibald, 1979. The diatom flora of southern Africa 5. CSIR Special Report WAT 50, Pretoria.Google Scholar
  66. Simonsen, R., 1962. Untersuchungen zur Systematik und Ökologie der Bodendiatomeen der westlichen Ostsee. Int. Revue ges. Hydrobiol., Syst. Beih. 1: 1–144.Google Scholar
  67. Skvortzow, B. W. & C. I. Meyer, 1928. A contribution to the diatoms of Baikal Lake. Proc. Sungaree River Biol Stat. 1: 1–55.Google Scholar
  68. Sonnebom, T. M., 1957. Breeding systems, reproductive methods, and species problems in protozoa. In E. Mayr (ed.), The species problem. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington. Publication 50: 155–324.Google Scholar
  69. Sonnebom, T. M., 1975. The Paramecium aurelia complex of fourteen sibling species. Trans. Am. microsc. Soc. 94: 155–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Soudek, D., Jr. & G. C. G. Robinson, 1983. Electrophoretic analysis of the species and population structure of the diatom Asterionella formosa. Can. J. Bot. 61: 418–433.Google Scholar
  71. Stace, C. (ed.), 1975. Hybridization and the flora of the British Isles. Academic Press, London, 626 pp.Google Scholar
  72. Stebbins, G. L., 1950. Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press, New York, 643 pp.Google Scholar
  73. Stidolph, S. R., 1993. Hantzschia doigiana, a new taxon of brackish-marine diatom from New Zealand coastal waters. Diatom Res. 8: 465–474.Google Scholar
  74. Stoermer, E. F. & J. J. Yang, 1971. Contributions to the diatom flora of the Laurentian Great Lakes. I. New and little-known species of Amphora (Bacillariophyta Pennatibacillariophyceae). Phycologia 10: 397–409.Google Scholar
  75. Stoermer, E. F., J. P. Kociolek & W. Cody, 1990. Cyclotubicoalitus undatus, genus et species nova. Diatom Res. 5: 171–177.Google Scholar
  76. Theriot, E., 1992. Clusters, species concepts, and morphological evolution of diatoms. Syst. Biol. 41: 141–157.Google Scholar
  77. Theriot, E. & E. Stoermer, 1984. Principal component analysis of Stephanodiscus: observations on two new species from the Stephanodiscus niagarae complex. Bacillaria 7: 37–58.Google Scholar
  78. Thoday, J. M., 1972. Disruptive selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., B 182: 109–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. VanLandingham, S. L., 1975. Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part V. Navicula. J. Cramer, Vaduz: 2386–2963.Google Scholar
  80. Werner, D., 1977. Introduction with a note on taxonomy. In D. Werner (ed.), The biology of diatoms (Botanical monographs 13). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford: 1–17.Google Scholar
  81. Zechman, F. W., E. A. Zimmer & E. C. Theriot, 1994. Use of ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacers for phylogenetic studies in diatoms. J. Phycol. 30: 507–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. G. Mann
    • 1
  • S. J. M. Droop
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Botanic GardenEdinburghUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations