Plant and Soil

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 213–220

Field evaluation of heat units for predicting crop residue carbon and nitrogen mineralization

  • C. W. Honeycutt
  • L. J. Potaro
Article

Abstract

More efficient fertilization practices could conceivably be developed if nutrient availability from manures and crop residues could be accurately predicted under field conditions. Heat units were recently found useful for describing the combined thermal and temporal relationships with papermill sludge C and N mineralization. This study was conducted to describe C and N mineralization of corn (Zea mays L. cv. ‘King 1113’), lupin (Lupinus albus L. cv. ‘ultra’), and potato (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. ‘russet burbank’) residues and to field test the utility of heat units in predicting these processes. Residues of each crop were applied to soil microplots in May, June, and July of 1987. Carbon mineralization was monitored by periodic capture of evolved CO2 in alkali traps. Nitrogen mineralization-immobilization processes were followed by frequent sampling for KCl extractable inorganic N. Net N mineralization from the potato residue occurred almost immediately after residue application, apparently owing to its relatively low C/N of 15/1. Net N mineralization from the corn and lupin residues began 119, 99, and 317 d after application in the May, June, and July application months, respectively. These respective times represented 2346, 1990, and 2360 degree days after application. Heat units appear to provide a mathematically simple, pragmatic approach for predicting crop residue N mineralization under field climatic conditions.

Key words

crop residue degree days heat units N cycling N immobilization N mineralization N modeling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J P E 1982 Soil respiration. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Eds. A L Page et al. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, 831–871.Google Scholar
  2. Andrén O and Paustian K 1987 Barley straw decomposition in the field: A comparison of models. Ecology 68, 1190–1200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouyoucos G J 1962 Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analysis of soils. Agron. J. 54, 464–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen B T 1986 Barley straw decomposition under field conditions: Effect of placement and initial nitrogen content on weight loss and nitrogen dynamics. Soil Biol. Biochem. 18, 523–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Doran J W 1980 Microbial changes associated with residue management with reduced tillage. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 518–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frankenberger W TJr and Abdelmagid H M 1985 Kinetic parameters of nitrogen mineralization rates of leguminous crops incorporated into soil. Plant and Soil 87, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fu M H, Xu X C and Tabatabai M A 1987 Effect of pH on nitrogen mineralization in crop-residue-treated soils. Biol. Fert. Soils 5, 115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Goering H K and VanSoest P J 1970 Forage Fiber Analysis. USDA-ARS Agric. Handb. 379. U.S. Gov. Print. Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  9. Hargrove W L 1986 Winter legumes as a nitrogen source for no-till grain sorghum. Agron. J. 78, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herman W A, McGill W B and Dormaar J F 1977 Effects of initial chemical composition on decomposition of roots of three grass species. Can. J. Soil Sci. 57, 205–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hesterman O B, Russelle M P, Sheaffer C C and Heichel G H 1987 Nitrogen utilization from fertilizer and legume residues in legume-corn rotations. Agron. J. 79, 726–731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Honeycutt C W, Zibilske L M and Clapham W M 1988 Heat units for describing carbon mineralization and predicting net nitrogen mineralization. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 52, 1346–1350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huntington T G, Grove J H and Frye W W 1985 Release and recovery of nitrogen from winter annual cover crops in no-till corn production. Comm. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 16, 193–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Janzen H H and Kucey R M N 1988 C, N, and S mineralization of crop residues as influenced by crop species and nutrient regime. Plant and Soil 106, 35–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keeney D R and Nelson D W 1982 Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Eds. A L Page et al. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, 643–698.Google Scholar
  16. Klute A 1986 Water retention: Laboratory methods. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I. Ed. A Klute. 2nd ed. Agronomy 9, 635–662.Google Scholar
  17. Miller R H 1974 Factors affecting the decomposition of an anaerobically digested sewage sludge in soil. J. Environ. Qual. 3, 376–380.Google Scholar
  18. Sain P and Broadbent F E 1977 Decomposition of rice straw in soils as affected by some management factors. J. Environ. Qual. 6, 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sims J L and Frederick L R 1970 Nitrogen immobilization and decomposition of corn residue in soil and sand as affected by residue particle size. Soil Sci. 109, 355–361.Google Scholar
  20. Stevenson F J 1986 Cycles of Soil Carbon, Nitrogen, Phosphorus, Sulfur, Micronutrients. John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  21. VanSoest P J and Robertson J B 1979 Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds. In Standardization of Analytical Methodology for Feeds. Eds. W JPigden et al. Int. Devel. Res. Centre, Ottawa, Canada.Google Scholar
  22. Wagger M G, Kissel D E and Smith S J 1985 Mineralization of nitrogen from nitrogen-15 labeled crop residues under field conditions. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 1220–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Waksman S A and Gerretsen F C 1931 Influence of temperature and moisture upon the nature and extent of decomposition of plant residues by microorganisms. Ecology 12, 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Wilkinson L 1987 SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYS-TAT, Inc., Evanston, IL.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. W. Honeycutt
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. J. Potaro
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.USDA-ARS, New England Plant, Soil, and Water LaboratoryUniversity of MaineOronoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Plant, Soil and Environmental SciencesUniversity of MaineOronoUSA

Personalised recommendations