Plant and Soil

, Volume 125, Issue 2, pp 177–184 | Cite as

Combined effects of leaching fraction, salinity, and potassium content of waters on growth and water-use efficiency of wheat and barley

  • M. S. Heakal
  • A. S. Modaihsh
  • A. S. Mashhady
  • A. I. Metwally
Article

Abstract

Wheat and barley seedlings growing in pots in a greenhouse, with a non-saline sandy loam soil were irrigated, by saline waters, S1, S2, and S3, having ECi=3, 9, and 15 mS cm-1, respectively. Each solution has three potassium concentrations, K1=6, K2=11, and K3=16 meq L-1, and all incorporated N (90 mg L-1) and micro-nutrients. Irrigation was provided to realize 0.2 and 0.5 leaching fractions (L).

At maturity, dry matter of plant tops (Y), grain yield (G), and evapotranspiration (ET) of both crops responded significantly to the S, L, and K treatments. There were different interactions, however, between the crops indicating some effect of plant species. In both, a decrease in Y with increasing salinity was associated with a corresponding decrease in ET. In the most saline S3 treatments, where the available water to plants was the lowest, an ample K supply produced substantial improvements in salinity tolerance of both crops. Under these conditions, changes in Y and ET were independent of each other. Increasing K supply, reduced the rate by which Y decreased with respect to S. Barley accumulated dry matter more efficiently (in terms of ET Y-1, g per g) particularly under L=0.2. This efficiency for both crops did not respond to the water salinity but rather to the potassium concentration of the waters.

The whole experiment was also carried out under two levels of phosphorus application (35 and 70 mg P kg-1 soil). Neither growth nor water-use efficiency were significantly affected by the higher rate of phosphorus application.

Key words

barley dry matter evapotranspiration leaching fraction potassium salinity tolerance water salinity water-use efficiency wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams J F and Doerge T A 1987 Soil salinity and soil acidity as factors in plant nutrition. In Future Developments in Soil Science Research Ed. Com. Ch. L LBoersma. pp 193–203. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  2. Arnon I 1972 Crop Production in Dry Regions, Vol II: Systematic Treatment of the Principle Crops. Leonard Hill, London, 683 p.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein L, Francois L E and Clark R A 1974 Interactive effects of salinity and fertility on yields of grains and vegetables. Agron. J. 66, 412–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biebl R 1958 Der Einfluss der Mineralstoffe auf die Transpiration. In Encyclopedia of Plant Physiology, 4, 382–426.Google Scholar
  5. Briggs D E 1978 Barley. Chapman and Hall, London, 612 p.Google Scholar
  6. Cerda A, Bingham F T and Hoffman G J 1977 Interactive effect of salinity and phosphorus on sesame. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 41, 915–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Champagnol F 1979 Relationships between phosphate nutrition of plants and salts toxicity. Phosphorus Agric. 76, 35–43.Google Scholar
  8. Maas E V and Hoffman G J 1976 Crop salt tolerance expressed as the decrease in yield: Evaluation of existing data. In Managing Saline Water for Irrigation. Proceedings of the International Salinity Conference (pub. 1977), pp. 187–198.Google Scholar
  9. Mashhady A S, Heakal M S, Abdel-Aziz M H and Sayed H I 1985 Nutritional effects of non-steady state soil salinity on a salt-tolerant wheat cultivar. Plant and Soil 83, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1990

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. S. Heakal
    • 1
  • A. S. Modaihsh
    • 1
  • A. S. Mashhady
    • 1
  • A. I. Metwally
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Soil Science, College of AgricultureUniversity of King SaudRiyadhKingdom of Saudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations